Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 30;21:44. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01189-5

Table 1.

The study criteria to assess quality of qualitative studies

Topic Guide question/description
Title and abstract
Title Does the title of the study describe the nature and topic of the study e.g. qualitative study, healthcare access, phenomenology, women with disabilities, etc.
Abstract Has the purpose of study, design and approach of the study, participants, the study date and the summary of key findings been provided in the abstract?
Introduction
Context and problem statement Have description of the problem, its significance, background been explained in the introduction of the study?
Purpose or research question Have objectives and questions of the study been cited vividly?
Study design
Qualitative approach What is the methodological orientation of the study? e.g. Grounded theory, content analysis, phenomenology, ethnography
Participation selection
Sampling How research participants were selected? Purposive, snowball, consecutive, convenience
Description of sample The needed Details about participants. (E.g. gender, age, kind of disability, marital status, employment status, residence status, etc.)
Sample size How many participants were in the study?
Data collection
Research team and reflexivity Has the researcher/interviewer explained about her/his personal characteristics, knowledge, trainings, and experiences in the study?
Method of data collection How the researcher communicate with the participants? Telephone, individual face to face interview, focus group, etc.
Setting of data collecting Where was the interview held?
Interview guide Have the interview questions been provided by the authors in the paper?
Audio/ visual recording Has the researcher used audio/visual recording to collect the data?
Duration How long did the interviews last?
Analysis and findings
Description of the coding tree Has the researcher cited the process of coding qualitative data? e.g. open coding, axial coding and selective coding
Categorization of the study’s findings Have the study findings been shown in a table? e.g. code, subcategory, category, theme
Data analysis Has the researcher described the method of data analysis e.g. Thematic, framework, content analysis or grounded theory
Software Has the researcher used a software to manage the data? e.g. MAXQDA or NVivo