Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;9:e10652. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10652

Table 3. Evaluation standards for the allocation of scores in the criteria.

Score CRITERIA
Early detection Initial day for observing plant changes (day) Differentiate control and CO2 (≥10%) stress treatment
5 ≤1 Y*
4 2–4 Y
3 5–7 Y
2 8–10 Y
1 >10 Y
*Y: The parameters differentiate the control and CO2 stress treatments (P < 0.05).
CO2 specificity Differentiate water stress treatment from
5 CO2 (≥10%) stress and water + CO2 stress*
4 Water + CO2 stress
3 CO2 (≥10%) stress
2 Control
1 N**
*The parameters differentiate water stress treatment from compared treatments (P < 0.05); **N: The parameter cannot detect water stress.
Field applicability Nondestructive Remotely detectable Automatic monitor Continuous monitor
5 Y* Y Y Y
4 Y Y Y N**
3 Y Y N N
2 Y N N N
1 N N N N
*Y: the parameter meets the criterion; **N: the parameter does not meet the criterion.
Cost Average cost of device and time
5 Low*
4 Low + medium**
3 Medium***
2 Medium + high****
1 High*****
*Low: low device (<$5,000) and low time (<3 min).
**Low + medium: (1) low device and medium time (4–20 min) or (2) low time and medium device ($5,000–$30,000).
***Medium: (1) medium device and medium time, (2) low device and high time, or (3) low time and high device.
****Medium + high: (1) medium device and high time (>20 min) or (2) medium time and high device (>$30,000).
*****High: high device and high time.