Expression and Role of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) in Tumors: From the Cells to the Patients

Guohua Zhu; Jukun Song; Weimin Chen; Dongbo Yuan; Wei Wang; Xiaoyue Chen; Hen Liu; Hao Su; Jianguo Zhu

doi:10.2147/CMAR.S275172

. 2021 Jan 25;13:659–675. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S275172

Expression and Role of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) in Tumors: From the Cells to the Patients

Guohua Zhu ^1,^2,^*, Jukun Song ^2,^3,^*, Weimin Chen ^3,^*, Dongbo Yuan ^2,³, Wei Wang ², Xiaoyue Chen ³, Hen Liu ^2,⁴, Hao Su ^2,⁴, Jianguo Zhu ^1,^2,^3,^4,^✉

PMCID: PMC7847771 PMID: 33536782

Abstract

Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) is a secretory antagonist of the classical Wnt signaling pathway. Many studies have reported that Dkk1 is abnormally expressed in tumor cells, and abnormal expression of Dkk1 can inhibit cell proliferation or induce apoptosis through pro-apoptotic factors, However, due to the differences in tumor environment and the complex regulatory mechanisms in different tumors, Dkk1 has different effects on the progression of different tumors. In many tumors, high expression of Dkk1 may promote tumor metastasis. However, Dkk1, which is highly expressed in other tumors, can inhibit tumor invasion and metastasis. More and more evidence shows that Dkk1 plays a complex and different role in tumor occurrence, development and metastasis in different tumor environments and through a variety of complex regulatory mechanisms. Therefore, Dkk1 may not only be a useful biomarker of metastasis, but also a target for studying the metabolic mechanism of tumor cells and treating tumors in many tumor types. Therefore, this article reviews the research progress on the expression, mechanism and function of Dkk1 in different tumors, and at the same time, based on the public database data, we made a further analysis of the expression of Dkk1 in different tumors.

Keywords: dickkopf-1, Dkk1, Wnt signaling pathway, tumor mechanism, metastasis, biomarker, in vitro, in vivo

Introduction

Dickkopf-1(Dkk1), a typical secretory antagonist of Wnt signaling pathway, was discovered in 1998. Dkk1 is a secretory glycoprotein with two conserved domains rich in cysteine and a connecting region of 50–55 amino acids. The full length of human Dkk1 gene is 1815kb, which is located on chromosome 10q11.2.26. The Dkk1 protein consists of 266 amino acids and its relative molecular weight is about 29 kDa. Dkk2, Dkk3 and Dkk4 have sequence homology in vertebrates, in which Dkk2 and Dkk4 can inhibit Wnt signal, but the inhibitory effect is weaker than Dkk1, and the mechanism of Dkk3 is still unclear.^1–4

Wnt signal pathway includes the classical pathway (Wnt/β-catenin) and the non-classical pathway.⁵^,⁶ In the classical pathway, the activity of Wnt is mediated by the close regulation of β-catenin stability.⁷ Current studies have shown that Dkk1 acts in these ways: Dkk1 specifically inhibits the typical Wnt signal pathway by competing with the receptor LRP5/6.57–59 for Wnt ligand; the other is that the formation of the complex of Dkk1 with LRP5/6 and KrementFrizzled leads to the phosphorylation of β-catenin, which inhibits the downstream regulation of cell cycle, tissue and organ fibrosis and other related target gene expression.⁸^,⁹

In the non-classical pathway, the Wnt pathway is activated in two ways, one is the non-canonical Wnt/PCP (planar cell polarity) pathway: Wnt ligand binding to frizzled receptors leads to activation of Dishevelled (Dvl) which recruits DAAM1 (Dishevelled associated activator of morphogenesis 1) enhancing the stimulation of GTPases Rac (Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate) and RHOA (Ras homolog gene family member A) leading to actin cytoskeleton rearrangement. In addition, Dvl activates Rac and finally JNK (c-Jun-N-terminal-kinase) thereby modulating cell migration;¹⁰ The other is the Wnt/calcium pathway: Wnt ligands bind to frizzled receptors and Ror/Ryk co-receptors, activating Dvl and trimeric G-proteins (Gα,β,γ). This leads to the generation of IP3 (inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate) and DAG2 (diacylglycerol) through PLC (Phospholipase C) activation. IP3 triggers the release of calcium ions (Ca2+) from the endoplasmic reticulum activating calmodulin and subsequently CAMKII (calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II), TAK-1 (TGF-β activated kinase 1) and NLK (Nemo-like kinase) thereby inhibiting the canonical Wnt pathway. Moreover, calmodulin activation stimulates calcineurin and NFAT (Nuclear Factor of Activated T-cells) involved in adhesion and migration processes. This pathway activates also PKC (Protein Kinase C) and Cdc42 (cell division control protein 42) rearranging the actin cytoskeleton.¹¹

In the Wnt pathway, mutations at key sites, methylation of the promoter and stability of β-catenin have been shown to be associated with tumor progression and low survival in patients: The progression of chronic phase CML toward blastic crisis phase due to GSK3β mutations and β-catenin stabilization in GMP cells (granulocyte-macrophage progenitor cells).¹² And Wnt pathway inhibitor promoters (ie, SFRP,DKK and WIF-1) are hypermethylated in ALL and AML and are associated with low survival in patients.¹³^,¹⁴ Loss-of-function mutations in APC and RNF43 and gain-of-function mutations in RSPO (characterized by gene fusions) and CTNNB1 was reported in the vast majority of colorectal cancers (CRC).¹⁵

Some studies have proven that high expression of Dkk1 can occur in a variety of cancer cell lines (such as liver cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, glioma, and cervical cancer) which induce apoptosis by inhibiting cell proliferation and transformation.¹⁶^,¹⁷ Therefore, some researchers believe that Dkk1 has the potential to be used as a biological marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of a variety of cancers.^18–20 But in other tumors, the expression of Dkk1 exists as a tumor suppressor. Because of the complex regulation mechanism in different tumors and the influence of different tumor environments, the effect of Dkk1 on tumor shows two sides.

Expression of Dkk1 in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the world. In recent years, advances in diagnosis and treatment have made remarkable progress in improving the survival of patients with lung cancer, but the survival rate of patients with lung cancer is still low of which Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the vast majority of lung cancer. A study shows that vasculogenic mimicry (VM) may be associated with the maintenance of tumor rich blood supply in highly invasive uveal melanoma,²¹ while epithelial-mesenchymal transformed (EMT) and cancer stem cell-like cell (CSC) have been shown to be associated with VM in some tumors.^22–24 Wnt signaling pathway plays an important role in embryonic development and tumorigenesis, so it is closely related to EMT and CSC.²⁵^,²⁶ The analysis of tumor tissue samples from 205 patients with lung cancer showed that VM could lead to more aggressive cancer and poor prognosis, and it was found that Dkk1 was related to histological classification and differentiation in VM. In addition, the overexpression of Dkk1 was positively correlated with the existence of VM and the high expression of some VM-related proteins (MMP2,MMP9 and VE- cadherin). In vitro and in vivo experiments also showed that Dkk1 could fully induce EMT and promote the formation of VM. The data showed that CSC phenotype was related to VM and Dkk1 overexpression, and in vivo studies showed that lung cancer cells overexpressing Dkk1 had more CSC phenotype and more invasiveness than normal lung cancer cells. This study describes the previously unrecognized role of Dkk1 and confirms the hypothesis that Dkk1 promotes VM formation by inducing EMT-related proteins and developing CSC properties in NSCLC.²⁷

Shen et al²⁸ measured the serum levels of Dkk1 autoantibodies in 206 patients with NSCLC and 99 healthy controls by indirect ELISA. The patients were followed up for 3 years to evaluate the correlation between the serological level of antibodies and the overall survival time (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The final results showed that the level of autoantibodies in sera of patients with NSCLC was much higher and was closely related to distant metastasis. Cox regression analysis showed that antibodies against Pep B subtype were independent prognostic factors of NSCLC. The serum Dkk1 levels of 470 patients with NSCLC (140 bone metastases, 178 extraosseous metastases and 152 complete remission) were quantified and analyzed. The results showed that the serum Dkk1 levels of patients with bone metastases were significantly higher than those of the other two groups. After determining the threshold by ROC curve, it was found that the best cutoff value was 311.8 pg/mL, and the serum Dkk1 was correlated with the number of bone lesions of bone metastasis, indicating that Dkk1 can be used to detect bone metastasis of NSCLC.²⁹

Expression of Dkk1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A variety of causes, such as viruses and the environment, can cause Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). About 78,200 new confirmed cases are reported each year.³⁰^,³¹ The 5-year survival rate of HCC patients varies from stage to stage, ranging from 50% to 75% in the early stage, while the 5-year survival rate in HCC patients with distant metastasis is reduced to 3%.³²^,³³ In clinical practice, serum Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) and ultrasound have been widely used in early screening of liver cancer.³⁴ However, when AFP is in the critical range of 20 ng/mL, its sensitivity is reduced to 53% and specificity is 90%. Therefore, western scholars exclude it from the diagnosis of liver cancer because of its poor sensitivity.^35–37 By comparing the serum Dkk1 levels of 831 test cohort participants and 453 validation cohort participants, and the liver tissue Dkk1 mRNA and protein levels of HCC patients and non-cancer patients, Professor Qin Wenxin³⁸ found that Dkk1 can complement the measurement of AFP in HCC diagnosis, improve the differentiation of AFP-negative HCC patients, and distinguish HCC from non-malignant chronic liver disease.

Previous evidence has shown that Dkk1 plays a role in promoting angiogenesis during tumorigenesis and inflammation,³⁹ Choi et al⁴⁰ stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC), with recombinant Dkk1 (rDDK-1) and conditioned medium of 293 cell cultures transfected with Dkk1. The expression of angiogenesis-related factors and EnMT-related markers were detected and formed through test tube. The effects of exogenous Dkk1 on angiogenesis and EnMT were evaluated by cell invasion and wound healing tests. The results showed that the increase of EnMT potential of HUVEC stimulated by Dkk1 was related to the activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and its downstream molecules such as Akt and Erk, while the expression of β-catenin and GSK3 β did not change significantly, indicating that Dkk1 can induce angiogenesis by regulating VEGFR2 independent of Wnt signal transduction pathway. Surgery (including local hepatectomy and liver transplantation) is still the most effective treatment in the treatment of liver cancer, but due to low diagnostic sensitivity and lack of health awareness, more than 60% of HCC patients are diagnosed with advanced disease or suffer from multiple diseases and lose the opportunity of operation.⁴¹ Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) once was the first choice for the treatment of inoperable advanced HCC patients. Randomized controlled trials show that TACE can improve the survival rate and quality of life of HCC patients.⁴² However, due to the influence of disease heterogeneity caused by tumor burden, liver function, disease etiology and so on, not all patients who meet the treatment of TACE can benefit from it,⁴³ and frequent TACE may aggravate liver injury. Xiaoxia Wu⁴⁴ retrospectively analyzed the changes of serum Dkk1 and circulating tumor cell (CTC) in 155 patients with HCC treated with TACE. It was found that after TACE treatment, the serum Dkk1 and CTCs in the reaction group were significantly lower than those before treatment, and the overall survival time, disease-free survival time and 5-year survival rate of patients with positive serum Dkk1 and CTC before treatment were significantly lower than those before treatment. It is suggested that the serum Dkk1 and CTCs are effective biomarkers to predict the efficacy and long-term prognosis of TACE in patients with HCC.⁴⁵

Expression of Dkk1 in Esophageal Carcinoma

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the sixth deadliest cancer disease in the world, and its incidence is increasing year by year. The main pathological type of cancer in Asian and African patients is esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), while in European patients, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is more common.⁴⁶^,⁴⁷ Although great progress has been made in the treatment of EC, compared with its survival rate of only 14%,⁴⁸ it is still worthy of further study.

By using RT-PCR and Western blot to detect the expression of Dkk1 in EC tissues, paired normal esophageal tissues and EC tumor cell lines, it was found that the expression of Dkk1 gene was up-regulated at both mRNA and protein levels in esophageal cancer tissues. At the same time, Dkk1 gene was expressed to varying degrees in all four esophageal cancer cell lines analyzed. However, after the construction of EC9706 cell lines overexpressing Dkk1, it was found that the proliferation rate of overexpressed EC9706 cells increased. The proportion of S phase and G2/M phase increased, while the proportion of G0/G1 decreased, and the overexpression of Dkk1 led to the enhancement of invasive ability of EC9706 cells. The results suggest that Dkk1 may be a key regulator in the occurrence and development of carcinoma.⁴⁹ By comparing the serum Dkk1 levels of 90 ESCC patients and 85 healthy patients by ELISA, it was found that the Dkk1 level of ESCC patients was much higher than that of the healthy control group; the sensitivity and specificity for the determination of serum Dkk1, were 70% and 80% respectively, and the serum Dkk1 level of ESCC patients increased before operation, which means that Dkk1 may be a useful marker for diagnosing and judging the treatment and prognosis of ESCC patients.⁵⁰ The expression of Dkk1 protein in resected specimens of ESCC patients was compared with various clinicopathological parameters and prognosis (the relationship between disease-free survival (DFS)) showed that the DFS of patients with Dkk1-positive tumors was worse than that of ESCC-negative patients (5-year DFS;1.5% vs 53.6% DFS;1.5% 0.0062), indicating that Dkk1 can be used as a new predictor of poor prognosis in patients with ESCC after radical resection.⁵¹

Expression of Dkk1 in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the second largest cause of cancer-related death in the world.⁵² Although the development of surgical techniques and targeted therapy has increased the 5-year survival rate of early gastric cancer (EGC) to more than 90%,⁵³ the survival rate of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is still about 40%.⁵⁴

A study compared the serum Dkk1 of 153 patients with gastric cancer and 173 healthy controls, and the expression of Dkk1 in 144 cancer samples of 153 patients and 265 consecutive gastric cancer specimens showed that the serum Dkk1 concentration of patients with gastric cancer was significantly higher than that of healthy controls, the critical value was 31.9150 pg/mL, and the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gastric cancer were 87.6% and 87.9%, respectively. The survival rate of gastric cancer patients with serum Dkk1 level ≥ 60.0 pg/mL was significantly lower than that of gastric cancer patients with lower serum Dkk1.⁵⁵ But what is the expression of Dkk1 in patients with gastric cancer and its clinical significance? Zhuang et al⁵⁶ detected the expression of serum Dkk1 protein in 90 cases of gastric cancer, 50 cases of gastric benign disease and 40 healthy persons by ELISA, and the dynamic changes of serum Dkk1 protein in gastric cancer patients undergoing radical operation for 1 month. It was found that the expression of serum Dkk1 protein in the gastric cancer group was significantly higher than that in the gastric benign group and the healthy control group. The serum Dkk1 level in patients with TNM stage III and IV was significantly higher than that in patients with TNM stage I and II. The level of serum Dkk1 was related to microvascular infiltration, degree of differentiation, and depth of invasion. The level of serum Dkk1 decreased significantly after radical operation. The results suggest that Dkk1 detection can be used as a reference index for monitoring the progression and biological behavior of gastric cancer. The results of another meta-analysis also supported this result, and this meta-analysis also found that the overexpression of Dkk1 was not only associated with vascular and lymphatic invasion, but also with distant metastasis and overall survival of patients with gastric cancer.⁵⁷ In the process of embryonic development and homeostasis of human tissue, Wnt signal cascade regulates cell proliferation, cell polarity, and cell development.⁷ Solid tumors often show an imbalance in the Wnt signal pathway, which is related to the enhancement of malignant potential.⁵⁸ Dkk1 is an antagonist of Wnt/β-catenin pathway. After examining the relationship between the co-expression of Dkk1 and β-catenin in gastric cancer and clinical prognosis, it was found that the co-expression of Dkk1 and β-catenin was significantly correlated with high N stage (N2 and N3). The overall survival (OS) and DFS of patients with high expression of Dkk1 were poor. Multivariate analysis showed that high expression of Dkk1 alone or high expression of Dkk1 with β-catenin positive were independent prognostic factors for tumor recurrence and overall survival, indicating that high expression of Dkk1 was an important prognostic factor for tumor recurrence and survival in resected AGC patients, regardless of the positivity of β-catenin.⁵⁹ The continuous activation of Wnt signaling pathway to maintain the self-renewal and tumorigenicity of gastric cancer stem cell (CSC) is considered to be a target for the treatment of gastric cancer. CD44⁺ cells were isolated from primary gastric cancer cells and gastric cancer cell lines by fluorescence activated cell sorting. The expression of adenovirus receptor in CD44⁺ cells and CD44⁻ cells was detected. Dkk1, a Wnt antagonist, was transfected into CD44Dkk1 cells by Ad5/35 (Ad5/35-Dkk1). After Dkk1 was introduced into CD44⁺ cells, it effectively inhibited the endogenous Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction and reduced the tumorigenicity of CD44⁺ cells in vivo, which verified the effectiveness of gene therapy targeting Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway in CSC cells.⁶⁰

Expression of Dkk1 in Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor of the digestive system⁶¹ and the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the Chinese population.⁶² It is closely related to the abnormal activation of Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway.⁶³^,⁶⁴ In recent years, the incidence of CRC has gradually increased, and tumor metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with CRC.⁶⁵ In metastatic patients, the 5-year survival rate was only about 10%~15%.⁶⁶

In an earlier study, some scholars found that Dkk1 was methylated in CRC cells, and when the expression of Dkk1 was restored, there was a decrease in cell colony density and tumor growth inhibition in nude mice.⁶⁷ A large cohort study showed that Dkk1 was methylated in 95% of CRC patients, and its methylation level was closely related to tumor microvessel density.⁶⁸ Immunohistochemistry showed that the expression of Dkk1 was down-regulated in colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the expression of Dkk1 was related to the decrease of microvessel density and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). At the same time, in vitro culture showed that HCT116 with overexpression of Dkk1 inhibited the formation of the tubular structure of human umbilical vein endothelial cells and down-regulated the expression of VEGF, and the tumor size, microvessel density and VEGF expression of CRC cells with high expression of Dkk1 decreased.⁶⁹ Because the low expression of Dkk1 indicates the abnormal activation of the Wnt pathway and is related to the poor prognosis of patients with CRC, it is suggested that we can increase the expression of Dkk1 by reducing the factors that inhibit the expression of Dkk1 (such as reducing the level of methylation or inhibiting the expression of CSN5) to produce anti-tumor effect. Therefore, the detection of the decrease of Dkk1 expression can be used as a warning of tumor progression in patients with CRC and provide an idea for the treatment of tumors. COP9 signalosome (CSN) is a highly conserved polyprotein complex in eukaryotes, which plays an important role in the regulation of the cell cycle, DNA damage response, and apoptosis. Microarray analysis of CRC cell lines showed that the expression of Dkk1 and the level of Dkk1 protein depended on the increase of Dkk1 secretion after CSN5 gene knockout, which affected the Wnt signal transduction of SW480 cells. It is suggested that CSN5 may actively drive abnormal Wnt signals by inhibiting Wnt antagonist Dkk1, thus promoting the development of colorectal cancer.⁷⁰ Therefore, understanding the molecular link between CSN5 and Wnt signals may help to design and develop new targets for the treatment of colorectal cancer. MicroRNA (miRNA or miRs) has been proven to be an important post-transcriptional regulator in tumorigenesis. At present, as the focus of tumor mechanism research, through the in vitro study of SW-480 and HCT-116 CRC cell lines, Wang et al⁷¹ found that miR-410 was up-regulated in CRC cell lines, and proved that Dkk1 is the direct target of miR-410. Knocking down miR-410 can promote the expression of Dkk1, inhibit the proliferation, migration and invasion of CRC cells, and induce apoptosis, while the overexpression of miR-410 shows the contrary. Another study also found that the expression level of the long non-coding Long-stranded non-coding RNA (lncRNA) HOXA transcript at the distal tip (HotTip) at the end of CRC cells was significantly higher than that in corresponding adjacent normal tissues, and the expression level of HotTip was higher in patients with larger tumor size, pathological stage or distant metastasis. Silencing the expression of HotTip can inhibit the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Mechanism studies have shown that HotTip regulates the metastasis of colorectal cancer cells by down-regulating the expression of tumor suppressor gene Dkk1. Therefore,⁷² the potential of miRNA and lncRNA as tumor candidate markers in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC is still worthy of further study.

Expression of Dkk1 in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) ranks fourth in cancer mortality in the United States.⁷³ From a pathological point of view, pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for about 90% of the pathological classification of PC.⁷⁴ Compared with other cancers of the digestive system, PC has a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of only 5% and a median survival time of less than 6 months.⁷⁵ Although surgical treatment is a feasible treatment, 80% of patients are in advanced stage or with metastasis at the time of diagnosis.⁷⁶

A study from Japan observed that there was a significant up-regulation of Dkk1 in PC cell line. After comparing the expression of Dkk1 protein and mRNA in PC tumor tissue and normal pancreatic tissue, the high expression of Dkk1 in tumor tissue was proved again. Further in vitro experiment found that the invasiveness of PC tumor cells with Dkk1 knockout was significantly decreased.⁷⁷ In terms of the mechanism of Dkk1 regulating PC, gene chip analysis showed that Dkk1 was an abnormal gene associated with GATA6 gene knockout. Immunoprecipitation and electrophoretic mobility shift analysis confirmed that GATA6 directly bound to the Dkk1 promoter. In the case of low GATA6 knock down, it was found that the mRNA expression of Dkk1 and the secretion of Dkk1 protein increased. Therefore, it has been proven that GATA6 negatively regulates Dkk1 transcription by directly binding to the GATA motif in the Dkk1 promoter region.⁷⁸ In order to explore the relationship between Dkk1 and the prognosis of patients with PC, Han et al⁷⁹ followed up 140 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 92 patients without PC for 2 years, including serum Dkk1 and CA19-9 levels and tumor progression. This study found that serum Dkk1 and CA19-9 were increased in patients with advanced PC and chronic pancreatitis, but Dkk1 was more effective in distinguishing PC from chronic pancreatitis than CA19-9, and the survival rate of patients with high expression of Dkk1 was significantly lower than that of patients with low expression of Dkk1. PCR detection of PDAC and paired normal tissues showed that the expression of Dkk1 was increased in PDAC tissues, which was confirmed by independent microarray analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis of Dkk1 expression and patient clinical data showed that OS and relapse-free survival (RFS) decreased in patients with high Dkk1 expression, and the expression of Dkk1 was significantly correlated with T stage and lymph node metastasis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that Dkk1 and lymph node metastasis were independent predictors of OS in patients with PDAC.⁸⁰ Based on the bioinformatics analysis of PDAC-related data sets in the GEO database, it was found that Dkk1 and HMGA2 are considered as hub genes with high connectivity, so Dkk1 and HMGA2 may become therapeutic targets and prognostic markers of PDAC.⁸¹ In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the role of lncRNA in PC.⁸² In order to understand the expression and role of LINC01133 in PC, the relationship between LINC01133 and Dkk1 promoter methylation was founded. After further detecting the expression of genes related to the Wnt signal pathway such as LINC01133 and Dkk1, and using EDU staining, scratch method and Transwell method to detect their effects on tumor cells, it was found that LINC01133 can down-regulate the expression of Dkk1 to inhibit the Wnt signal pathway, thus promoting the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer.⁸³ In the exosome study of PDAC, it was found that the new receptor cytoskeleton-associated protein 4 (CKAP4) of Dkk1 could be secreted through the small extracellular vesicle (SEV) of PDAC cells, and showed the characteristics of exosome. Histological and in vitro tumor detection showed that the level of CKAP4 in serum of PDAC patients was higher than that of normal patients, and CKAP4 monoclonal antibody could inhibit Dkk1 and CKAP4, and finally inhibit the proliferation and migration of PDAC cells.⁸⁴

Expression of Dkk1 in Cervical Cancer

Cervical cancer (CC) ranks fourth in tumor-related mortality among women.⁸⁵ The transformation from normal cervical epithelium to intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and finally to invasive cervical cancer is the most important pathological feature of CC.⁸⁶ Among the three histological types of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma is the most common, while human papillomavirus (HPV) is considered to be an independent risk factor in the occurrence of CC.⁸⁷^,⁸⁸ Corresponding vaccines have been developed for clinical prevention. And more and more studies have also pointed out that the carcinogenic effect of cervical cancer is designed to change a variety of genes.⁸⁹

Some studies have found that the transcription of Dkk1 in CC is inhibited in epigenetics, while further studies have found that there is a high level of methylation of Dkk1 promoter CpG in CC cell lines, and histone deacetylation is the main epigenetic change, so cell line-dependent and differentiated epigenetic mechanisms may be used to silence Dkk1 in CC cells.⁹⁰ By comparing the serum Dkk1 and clinical information of patients with cervical cancer, it was found that the level of serum Dkk1 in patients with cervical cancer was higher than that in healthy subjects, and it was related to the histological type and lymphatic metastasis of CC, so it may be helpful for the diagnosis of CC.⁹¹ After simultaneously detecting the serum Dkk1 of normal subjects, CIN patients and CC patients and following up their subsequent disease development data, it was found that the serum Dkk1 level of CC patients was higher than that of normal subjects and CIN patients, and the expression of Dkk1 was related to lymphatic metastasis and tumor diameter of cervical cancer, and related to the prognosis of cervical cancer patients. It can be used for the detection and diagnosis of CC, and for the prognosis evaluation of CC patients⁹² In view of the important role of lncRNA in the pathological process of cancer, some scholars have studied the role of lncRNA in CC and found that the promoting effect of SNHG7 on the development of CC depends on the activation of Wnt pathway mediated by Dkk1, while the binding of EZH2 and Dkk1 promoter and the share of H3K27me3 in Dkk1 promoter are decreased after SNHG7 silencing. It has been proven that SNHG7 silences Dkk1 through Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction pathway to aggravate the malignant degree of CC.⁹³

Expression of Dkk1 in Ovarian Cancer

Although the 5-year survival rate of patients with ovarian cancer has been stable for the past 20 years, it is still at a low level (30%~40%), making it the deadliest tumor in gynecological tumors.⁸⁵^,^94–96 Because its early clinical symptoms are not obvious, nearly 2/3 of the patients are in the late stage at the time of diagnosis.⁹⁷ Most (80%) of the patients who died had epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).⁹⁸

By using cDNA microarray to analyze the gene expression profile of metastatic EOC cells, it was found that Dkk1 was significantly down-regulated in metastatic tumors.⁹⁹ Through the study of the progress of EOC cells, it was found that STAT3 was overactivated in ovarian cancer, and the expression of Dkk1 increased significantly after reducing the expression of STAT3. Further studies found that STAT3 signal regulated tumor progression through miR-92a/β-1 and connected with Wnt/Dkk1-catenin signal, thus finding the metabolic pathway of tumor.¹⁰⁰ The member of 10–11 translocation (TET) family (TET1-3) is the key molecule of DNA demethylation,¹⁰¹^,¹⁰² and its expression is down-regulated in many cancers.¹⁰³^,¹⁰⁴ In the analysis of EOC, it was found that the expression of TET1 was negatively correlated with the clinical stage of ovarian cancer. Overexpression could inhibit the colony formation, invasion, metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of ovarian cancer cells. In terms of mechanism, it was found to be by TET1 through demethylation of Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway antagonist Dkk1. Therefore, TET1 plays an important anti-tumor role in ovarian cancer by activating Wnt/β-catenin signal inhibitor Dkk1.¹⁰⁵ Cordycepin (3-deoxyadenosineis) the main bioactive component of Cordyceps militaris, which has been reported to inhibit cell proliferation.^106–108 After further study on ovarian cancer, it was found that cordycepin kit-8 reagent based on cell count decreased the viability of ovarian cancer cells, Western blotting showed that cordycepin could increase the Dkk1 and inhibit β-catenin signal transduction. Overexpression of Dkk1 down-regulated the expression of c-Myc and cyclin D1, while silence down-regulated the expression of Atg8, beclin, and LC3, the results showed that cordycepin might inhibit the growth of ovarian cancer cells through synergistic autophagy and Dkk1/β-catenin signal transduction.¹⁰⁹ After the preparation of monoclonal antibody against Dkk1 (DKN-01), the effect of Dkk1 on tumor cell phenotype and tumor load was studied in vivo and in vitro. It was found that overexpression of DKN-01 had no significant effect on tumor cell phenotype and tumor load, but overexpression of Dkk1 reduced the infiltration of CD45⁺ leukocytes into the peritoneum and omentum, reduced natural killer (NK) and CD8T cells, and decreased the expression of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) on activated CD8T cells. Therefore, these results may indicate that the overexpression of Dkk1 provides a microenvironment to promote tumor by inhibiting the anti-tumor immune population, so the inhibition of Dkk1 may play the best role in combined immunoregulatory therapy.¹¹⁰

Expression of Dkk1 in Breast Cancer

Although today, with the rapid development of diagnosis and treatment technology, the prognosis of breast cancer patients is still poor.¹¹¹^,¹¹² Tumor metastasis is one of the main causes of death in patients with breast cancer,¹¹³ so the research based on the mechanism of breast cancer progression and metastasis has become a hot topic.

Compared with normal subjects, the level of serum Dkk1 in breast cancer patients was higher, and the level of Dkk1 in patients with bone metastasis was higher than that in patients without bone metastasis.¹¹⁴ The high expression of Dkk1 in triple negative breast cancer patients was regulated with poor prognostic.¹¹⁵ Dkk1 is associated with the progression of osteolytic bone metastasis by damaging the activity of osteoblasts.¹¹⁶ P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) regulates intracellular responses related to cell cycle, apoptosis and tumorigenesis. Inhibition of P38 in breast cancer cell lines can effectively inhibit the expression of Dkk1 in breast cancer cells, whereas activation of P38 can up-regulate Dkk1, suggesting that p38 may play a role in regulating Dkk1 in osteolytic tumors.¹¹⁷ Previous studies have shown that zoledronic acid and Atto vastatin can block mevalonate pathway to inhibit high expression of Dkk1 in hormone receptor negative breast cancer.¹¹⁸ But its dosage far exceeds the level of clinical safe use. A new study shows that zoledronic acid combined with low concentrations of statins can increase the inhibitory efficiency of human osteoblast tumor cells by 75%. When low concentrations of statins and zoledronic acid are used at low concentrations, the metastatic rate of Dkk1-mediated breast cancer bone metastatic cells can be reversed by at least 50%. Intratumoral injection of Atto vastatin and zoledronic acid can reduce serum Dkk1 levels by 25%.¹¹⁹ In the study of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC), it was found that MSCs from the rib perichondrium (PMSCs)-conditioned medium could significantly inhibit the growth, migration and invasion of breast cancer cells, and down-regulate the expression of Wnt/β-catenin pathway and its target genes, while neutralizing Dkk1 in PMSC-conditioned medium could significantly reduce its inhibitory effect on tumor cells. In vivo, PMSCs can inhibit the growth of breast cancer and prolong the survival time of tumor-bearing rats, suggesting that Dkk1 secreted by PMSC plays an important role in inhibiting the growth of breast cancer cells through Wnt/β-catenin pathway.¹²⁰ By comparing the serum Dkk1 and CA15-3 between breast cancer patients and healthy subjects, it was found that in the early stage of breast cancer, the sensitivity and specificity of Dkk1 were higher than that of CA15-3, while the expression of Dkk1 in HER-2-, ER-, and PR-positive patients was lower than that in HER-2-, ER- and PR- negative patients.¹²¹ After comparing the serum Dkk1 of 89 breast cancer patients and 86 healthy women, and comparing the Dkk1 and β-catenin in adjacent non-neoplastic breast tissues, primary breast tumors, lymph node metastasis and bone metastasis tissues, it was found that the serum Dkk1 in breast cancer patients were significantly higher than those in normal subjects, but the increase was more significant in patients with bone metastasis. The expression of Dkk1 in lymphoid nodule metastatic tissue and bone metastatic tissue was lower than that in primary tumor tissue and non-neoplastic breast tissue.¹²² Through identification, it was found that a small molecular chemical dorsomorphin could reduce the mRNA and protein levels of Dkk1 in breast cancer cell lines by 70% and 90%, respectively, suggesting that dorsomorphin may be a therapeutic drug for breast cancer.¹²³

Expression of Dkk1 in Bladder Urothelial Cancer

Research data from the United States show that bladder urothelial cancer (BUC) accounts for about 7% of new tumors and 4% of all cancer deaths.³² At the same time, it is also one of the most common urogenital cancers in the People's Republic of China.¹²⁴ BUC is divided into muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer (NMIBC). The incidence of MIBC is high and easily recurs, while NMIBC tends to relapse within 2 years.¹²⁵^,¹²⁶

Through the preoperative detection of serum Dkk1 in patients with bladder cancer, it was found that the increase of preoperative Dkk1 was closely related to tumor stage, grade and histological grade.¹²⁷ The serum samples of 94 patients with bladder cancer and 60 healthy subjects from the People's Republic of China showed that the serum Dkk1 in patients with bladder cancer was significantly higher than that in healthy subjects, and the serum Dkk1 was closely related to lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and TNM staging. The higher the serum Dkk1 the lower the survival rate of bladder cancer patients. Multivariate analysis showed that serum Dkk1 was an independent prognostic factor for OS of bladder cancer.¹²⁸ Gao et al¹²⁹ demonstrated that up-regulation of miR-543-3p in bladder cancer can activate Wnt/β-catenin signal by directly targeting Dkk1, while the expression of miR-543-3p is up-regulated in bladder cancer tissues and cells, and is positively correlated with high-grade bladder cancer, suggesting a potential tumor intervention target.

Discussion

Based on the above studies, most of the human samples were studied in vivo and in vitro. Most studies have pointed out that Dkk1 promotes the metastasis of various types of cancer, and is related to the late stage, metastasis and low short survival time of the tumor, and its diagnostic sensitivity is comparable to that of existing biomarkers, even beyond them.³⁸^,⁷⁹ But interestingly, in some tumors, Dkk1 showed tumor inhibitory effect in tumors.^61–72

Specifically, through the above research, we can find that Dkk1 has been shown to promote tumor metastasis in the following tumors: NSCLC, HCC, EC, GC, PC, CC, Breast cancer, and BUC. But In CRC and ovarian cancer, Dkk1 has been shown to play an inhibitory role in tumors. According to the results of the above literature, we can observe that the high expression of Dkk1 can significantly decrease the invasion and metastasis ability of CRC and EOC cells in vitro and in vivo. By comparing the serum samples of tumor patients and normal subjects, we also confirmed the protective effect of high expression of Dkk1 on CRC patients. However, high expression of Dkk1 was shown in other tumors to promote tumor progression. (Figure 1).

Summary of the research findings on the role of *Dkk1* in cancers from in vitro and in vivo experiments as well as from studies using serum from human patients.

In terms of the mechanism of Dkk1 in tumor, according to the correlation between Dkk1 and tumor metastasis in vivo and in vitro, the mechanism of action, and the survival time of patients, we have made a summary of the above-mentioned literature, showing the mechanism of promoting tumor is mainly concentrated in the following aspects: 1) promoting tumor angiogenesis;²⁷^,⁴⁰^,⁶⁹ 2) methylated Dkk1 promoter;⁶⁷^,⁶⁸^,⁸¹ 3) STAT3 regulates tumor progression through the interaction between miR-92a/β-1 pathway and Wnt/Dkk1-catenin signal;¹⁰⁰ 4) Synergistic autophagy and Dkk1/β-catenin signal transduction regulate tumor progression; and 5) change tumor immune microenvironment. However, in CRC, in vivo experiments showed that overexpression of Dkk1 caused down-regulation of VEGF expression. Tumor formation experiments in vitro showed that the tumor size, microvessel density and VEGF expression of CRC cells with high expression of Dkk1 decreased, and that CSN5, miR-410 and HotTip could promote the progress of CRC by inhibiting the expression of Dkk1.^70–72 And in EOC, TET1 plays a tumor suppressive role in ovarian cancer by activating Dkk1 through demethylation. (Table 1)

Table 1.

Studies in Human Cancer Revealing the Role of Dkk1 as a Cancer Biomarker

Study	Cancer Type	Experimental Approach	Metastasis in vitro (Cell Migration and Invasion)	Metastasis in vivo	Correlation with Malignant or Meta-Static Phenotype	Correlation with Decreased Survival	Suggested Mechanism of Action via the Pathway of
21–29	Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)	Analysis of tumor tissue samples from 205 patients with lung cancer.²⁷ The serum levels of Dkk1 autoantibodies were measured by ELISA in 206 patients with NSCLC and 99 healthy controls. And followed up for 3 years.²⁸ Serum Dkk1 levels were quantified and analyzed in 470 patients with NSCLC (140 bone metastases, 178 extraosseous metastases and 152 complete remission).²⁹	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Dkk1 promotes VM formation by inducing EMT-related proteins and developing CSC properties in NSCLC.
30–45	Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)	By comparing the serum Dkk1 levels of 831 test cohort participants and 453 verification cohort participants, the contents of Dkk1mRNA and protein in liver tissues of patients with HCC and non-cancer patients were compared.³⁸ Evaluation of the effects of exogenous Dkk1 on angiogenesis and EnMT by cell test.³⁹ Retrospectively analyzed the changes of serum Dkk1 and circulating tumor cell (CTC) in 155 HCC patients treated with TACE.⁴⁴	N/A	N/A	N/A	Yes	Dkk1 induces angiogenesis by regulating VEGFR2 independent of Wnt signal transduction pathway.
46–52	Esophageal carcinoma (EC)	The expression of Dkk1 in esophageal cancer tissues, matched normal esophageal tissues and esophageal cancer cell lines was detected by RT-PCR and Western blot methods. Serum Dkk1 levels of 90 ESCC patients and 85 healthy patients were compared by ELISA.⁴⁹ The expression of Dkk1 protein in surgical specimens of 170 patients with ESCC was compared with various clinical data.⁵¹	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	N/A
53–62	Gastric cancer (GC)	Comparison of serum Dkk1 levels in 153 GC patients and 173 healthy controls, and comparison of Dkk1 expression levels in 144 cancer specimens of 153 patients and 265 GC specimens.⁵⁵ ELISA was used to detect the expression of serum Dkk1 protein in 90 cases of gastric cancer, 50 cases of gastric benign diseases and 40 healthy persons, and to monitor the changes of serum Dkk1 protein in patients with gastric cancer after radical operation for a month.⁵⁶ Detection of the relationship between the co-expression of Dkk1 and β-catenin in gastric cancer and clinical prognosis.⁵⁹ To verify whether Dkk1 can effectively inhibit endogenous Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction in CD44⁺GC cells.⁶⁰	Yes	N/A	Yes	Yes	Wnt/β-catenin signal pathway
63–75	Colorectal cancer (CRC)	Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of Dkk1 in 476 colon specimens. HCT116 cells overexpressing Dkk1 were cultured in vitro and tumorigenesis was carried out in vitro.⁶⁹ Knock out CSN5 gene in SW480 cells and detect the expression of Dkk1.⁷⁰ The relationship between miR-410 and Dkk1 expression was demonstrated in SW-480 and HCT-116 CRC cell lines in vitro.⁷¹	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	CSN5actively drives abnormal Wnt signals by inhibiting Dkk1. Overexpression of miR-410 inhibits the expression of Dkk1 in CRC cells, thus promoting the proliferation, migration and invasion of CRC cells. HotTipregulates the metastasis of colorectal cancer cells by down-regulating the expression of tumor suppressor gene Dkk1.
76–87	Pancreatic cancer (PC)	The expression levels of Dkk1 protein and mRNA in normal pancreatic cells, PC cell lines, normal pancreatic tissues and PC tumor tissues were compared. Tumor invasiveness was detected after Dkk1 knockout in vitro.⁷³ Co-immunoprecipitation and knockout methods were used to prove that GATA6 negatively regulates Dkk1 transcription by directly binding to the GATA motif in the Dkk1 promoter region at the cellular level.⁷⁸ 140 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 92 patients without PC were followed up for 2 years to evaluate the levels of serum Dkk1 and CA19-9 and tumor progression.⁷⁹ Detection of Dkk1 expression in PDAC tissues and matched normal tissues, and comparison with clinical data items of patients.⁸⁰ The expression of LINC01133 and Dkk1 and their effects on tumor cells were detected by ectopic expression test, gene knockout test and gene reporting test.⁸¹ The interaction between CKAP4 and Dkk1 and its effect on PDAC cells were detected by texture detection and tumor formation in vitro.⁸⁴	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	GATA6 negatively regulates Dkk1 transcription by directly binding to the GATA motif in the Dkk1 promoter region. INC01133 can down-regulate the expression of Dkk1 to inhibit the Wnt signal pathway, thus promoting the growth and metastasis of pancreatic cancer.
88–96	Cervical cancer (CC)	Explore the epigenetic characteristics of Dkk1 in CC cell line.⁹⁰ Testing serum Dkk1 levels in patients with CC and comparing them with patient clinical information.⁹¹ Simultaneous testing of serum Dkk1 in normal subjects, patients with CIN, and patients with CC and follow-up of subsequent disease progression.⁹² Demonstration at the cellular level that SNHG7 epigenetically silences Dkk1 through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.⁹³	N/A	N/A	Yes	Yes	SNHG7 epigenetically silences Dkk1 through the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway to exacerbate CC malignancy
97–114	Ovarian cancer	STAT3 was demonstrated in EOC cells to regulate tumor progression via miR-92a/β-1 and to interconnect with Wnt/Dkk1-catenin signals.¹⁰⁰TET1 was demonstrated in EOC cells to inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin pathway through demethylation of Dkk1 and thus tumor suppression.¹⁰⁵ Cell-level validation of cordycepin inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth through synergistic autophagy and Dkk1/β-catenin signaling.¹⁰⁹	Yes	Yes	Yes	N/A	STAT3 regulates tumor cell metabolism by regulating miR-92a/β-1 and combining the Wnt/Dkk1-catenin signaling pathway. TET1 activates Dkk1 and inhibits Wnt/β-catenin pathway for tumor suppression through demethylation. Cordycepsin inhibits ovarian cancer cell growth through synergistic autophagy and Dkk1/β-catenin signaling.
115–127	Breast cancer	Comparison of serum Dkk1 in normal subjects, breast cancer patients, and patients with bone metastases.¹¹⁴^,¹¹⁵^,¹²¹^,¹²² In vivo experiments use drugs to interfere with Dkk1 and thereby suppress tumors.¹¹⁹^,¹²³ In vivo and in vitro experiments demonstrate that PMSC-secreted Dkk1 inhibits breast cancer cell growth through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.¹²⁰	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Possible role of p38 in regulating Dkk1 in osteolytic breast cancer tumors. PMSC-secreted Dkk1 inhibits breast cancer cell growth through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Statins in combination with zoledronic acid at low concentrations may inhibit tumor growth by reducing Dkk1 levels. The small molecule dorsomorphin may produce tumor suppression by reducing the transcriptional level of Dkk1.
128–134	Bladder urothelial cancer (BUC)	Detecting Dkk1 levels in BUC patients before surgery.¹²⁷ Determination of serum Dkk1 levels in normal subjects and BUC patients and comparison of clinical data.¹²⁸ Investigating the role of miR-543-3p on tumors via Dkk1 in BUC cells.¹²⁹	N/A	N/A	Yes	Yes	Upregulation of miR-543-3p in bladder cancer activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling by directly targeting Dkk1.

Open in a new tab

Current studies have shown that Dkk1 regulates tumor progression by inhibiting the downstream regulation of cell cycle, tissue and organ fibrosis and the expression of other related target genes. By downloading the oncology data of TCGA database and the expression data of normal tissue in GETx database, and used R to analyze the difference of Dkk1 in normal tissue and tumor tissue of different organs, it is found that: the expression of Dkk1 in ACC, CHOL, COAD, ESCA, GBM, HNSC, LGG, LIHC, LUAD, LUSC, PAAD, READ, STAD, TGCT, UCEC, and UCS was significantly higher than that in normal tissues, but in BLCA, KICH, PRAD, SKCM, and OV, the expression of Dkk1 in tumors was significantly lower than that in normal tissues (Figure 2).

Analysis of differential expression of *Dkk1* in tumor tissues and normal tissues based on TCGA and GTEx database.

**Abbreviations**: ACC, adrenocortical carcinoma; BLCA, bladder Urothelial Carcinoma; BRCA, breast invasive carcinoma; CESC, cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma; CHOL, cholangiocarcinoma; COAD, colon adenocarcinoma; ESCA, esophageal carcinoma; GBM, glioblastoma multiforme; HNSC, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; KICH, kidney chromophobe; KIRC, kidney renal clear cell carcinoma; KIRP, kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma; LAML, acute myeloid leukemia; LGG, brain lower grade glioma; LIHC, liver hepatocellular carcinoma; LUAD, lung adenocarcinoma; LUSC, lung squamous cell carcinoma; OV, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma; PAAD, pancreatic adenocarcinoma; PRAD, prostate adenocarcinoma; READ, rectum adenocarcinoma; SKCM, skin cutaneous melanoma; STAD, stomach adenocarcinoma; TGCT, testicular germ cell tumors; THCA, thyroid carcinoma; UCEC, uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma; UCS, uterine carcinosarcoma.

Dkk1 plays a role in regulating tumor progression because of its inhibition of classical Wnt pathway in tumors.⁸^,⁹ Therefore, Dkk1 is defined by most studies as a biological marker with the potential to evaluate tumor diagnosis and prognosis.^18–20 In most tumors, Dkk1 promotes tumor growth and metastasis by promoting angiogenesis and regulating immune microenvironment. However, in other tumor studies, it has been found that Dkk1 can inhibit the biological effect of tumor. Some scholars have put forward the following conjectures about the different biological effects of Dkk1 in tumors: 1) according to the transduction mode of Wnt signal in cancer cells, inhibiting β-catenin dependent Wnt signal does not necessarily inhibit tumor; 2) the characterization of Dkk1 as a β-catenin-dependent Wnt signal inhibitor in cancer cells is too simplistic, and it is important to consider other potential regulatory results of Dkk1; and 3) in some tumors, the classical Wnt signal pathway is structurally activated downstream of Dkk1. In this case, it can be assumed that Dkk1 cannot inhibit the transduction of the classical Wnt signal pathway, thus eliminating its potential antitumor activity.¹³⁰

In recent years, Dkk1 antibodies have been tried in tumor therapy, but because Wnt signaling is extremely complex, and the role of Dkk1 in promoting tumor growth and metastasis in cancer and immune cells in regulating this and other signaling pathways has not been fully elucidated. The close relationship between the expression level of Dkk1 in serum of clinical tumor patients and prognosis makes Dkk1 an attractive target for tumor therapy, and blocking the activity of Dkk1 in mice can significantly reduce the ability of tumor invasion and metastasis in vivo. Therefore, although Dkk1 has two sides in tumor measurement because its mechanism is not fully elucidated, it does not affect its potential as a target for targeted therapy of tumors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81660426), The Science and Technology Project of Guizhou Province in 2017 ([2017]5803), The High-level innovative talent project of Guizhou Province in 2018 ([2018]5639), The Science and Technology Plan Project of Guiyang in 2019 ([2019]2-15), Science and Technology Plan Project of Guizhou Province in 2019 ([2019]1203).

Abbreviations

AGC, advanced gastric cancer; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; BUC, bladder urothelial cancer; CAMKII, calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II; Cdc42, cell division control protein 42; CSC, cancer stem cell; CSC, cancer stem cell-like cell; CC, cervical cancer; CIN, cervical epithelium to intraepithelial neoplasia; CTC, circulating tumor cell; CRC, colorectal cancer; CSN, COP9 signalosome; CKAP4, cytoskeleton associated protein 4; DAAM1, dishevelled associated activator of morphogenesis 1; Dkk1, dickkopf-1; DFS, disease-free survival; EGC, early gastric cancer; EOC, epithelial ovarian cancer; EMT, epithelial–mesenchymal transformed; EAC, esophageal adenocarcinoma; EC, esophageal cancer; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; SEV, extracellular vesicle; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HotTip, HOXA transcript at the distal tip; HPV, human papillomavirus; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; lncRNA, long-stranded non-coding RNA; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; miRNA or miRs, MicroRNA; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PMSCs, MSCs from the rib perichondrium; MIBC, muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer; NFAT, nuclear factor of activated T-cells; NLK, nemo-like kinase; NMIBC, non-muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; PC, pancreatic cancer; PDAC, pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma; RFS, relapse-free survival; PKC, protein kinase C; RHOA, Ras homolog gene family member A; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; TAK-1, TGF-β activated kinase 1; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VM,vasculogenic mimicry.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1.Glinka A, Wu W, Delius H, Monaghan AP, Blumenstock C, Niehrs C. Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature. 1998;391:357–362. doi: 10.1038/34848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Krupnik VE, Sharp JD, Jiang C, et al. Functional and structural diversity of the human Dickkopf gene family. Gene. 1999;238:301–313. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00365-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Fedi P, Bafico A, Soria AN, et al. Isolation and biochemical characterization of the human Dkk-1 homologue, a novel inhibitor of mammalian Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:19465–19472. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Li J, Gong W, Li X, et al. Recent progress of Wnt pathway inhibitor Dickkopf-1 in liver cancer. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2018;18(8):5192‐5206. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2018.14636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:781‐810. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Katoh M. WNT/PCP signaling pathway and human cancer (review). Oncol Rep. 2005;14(6):1583‐1588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.MacDonald BT, Tamai K, He X. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell. 2009;17(1):9–26. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Mao B, Wu W, Li Y, et al. LDL-receptor-related protein 6 is a receptor for Dickkopf proteins. Nature. 2001;411(6835):321‐325. doi: 10.1038/35077108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Bafico A, Liu G, Yaniv A, Gazit A, Aaronson SA. Novel mechanism of Wnt signalling inhibition mediated by Dickkopf-1 interaction with LRP6/Arrow. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(7):683‐686. doi: 10.1038/35083081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Lai SL, Chien AJ, Moon RT. Wnt/Fz signaling and the cytoskeleton: potential roles in tumorigenesis. Cell Res. 2009;19:532–545. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.van Amerongen R, Nusse R. Towards an integrated view of Wnt signaling in development. Development. 2009;136:3205–3214. doi: 10.1242/dev.033910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Abrahamsson AE, Geron I, Gotlib J, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta missplicing contributes to leukemia stem cell generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3925–3929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900189106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Valencia A, Román-Gómez J, Cervera J, et al. Wnt signaling pathway is epigenetically regulated by methylation of Wnt antagonists in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23:1658–1666. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Roman-Gomez J, Cordeu L, Agirre X, et al. Epigenetic regulation of Wnt-signaling pathway in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:3462–3469. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-047043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487:330–337. doi: 10.1038/nature11252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Qin WX, Zhang HT, Yu YJ, et al. Uses of DKK-1 protein in diagnosis of cancer. Patent, WO/2007/104181 A1. 2007.
17.Yu YJ, Wan XZ, Yu B, et al. Expression of Dickkopf (Dkk1) in liver cancer and in multiple human cancer cell lines. Zhongliu. 2006;26:1109–1112. [Google Scholar]
18.Yu B, Yang X, Xu Y, et al. Elevated expression of Dkk1 is associated with cytoplasmic/nuclear β-catenin accumulation and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinomas. J Hepatol. 2009;50:948–957. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Sato N, Yamabuki T, Takano A, et al. Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 as a target for passive cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5326–5336. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Tung EK, Mak CK, Fatima S, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of serum and tissue Dickkopf-1 levels in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2011;31:1494–1504. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02597.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Maniotis AJ, Folberg R, Hess A, et al. Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:739–752. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65173-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Sun T, Zhao N, Zhao XL, et al. Expression and functional significance of Twist1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: its role in vasculogenic mimicry. Hepatology. 2010;51:545–556. doi: 10.1002/hep.23311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Zhang D, Sun B, Zhao X, et al. Twist1 expression induced by sunitinib accelerates tumor cell vasculogenic mimicry by increasing the population of CD133+ cells in triple‐negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:207. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Schnegg CI, Yang MH, Ghosh SK, et al. Induction of vasculogenic mimicry overrides VEGF‐A silencing and enriches stem‐like cancer cells in melanoma. Cancer Res. 2015;75:1682–1690. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Yang DH, Yoon JY, Lee SH, et al. Wnt5a is required for endothelial differentiation of embryonic stem cells and vascularization via pathways involving both Wnt/beta‐catenin and protein kinase Calpha. Circ Res. 2009;104:372–379. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.185405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Qi L, Sun B, Liu Z, et al. Dickkopf‐1 inhibits epithelial‐mesenchymal transition of colon cancer cells and contributes to colon cancer suppression. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:828–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02222.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Yao L, Zhang D, Zhao X, et al. Dickkopf-1-promoted vasculogenic mimicry in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with EMT and development of a cancer stem-like cell phenotype. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20(9):1673–1685. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Shen L, Wu X, Tan J, et al. Combined detection of dickkopf-1 subtype classification autoantibodies as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:3545–3556. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S134162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Qiao R, Zhong R, Chang Q, et al. Serum dickkopf-1 as a clinical and prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer patients with bone metastases. Oncotarget. 2017;8(45):79469–79479. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Abdelaziz AO, Elbaz TM, Shousha HI, et al. Survival and prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: an Egyptian multidisciplinary clinic experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:3915–3920. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.9.3915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, et al. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017;11:317–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Sangiovanni A, Colombo M. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond international guidelines. Liver Int. 2016;36(Suppl 1):124–129. doi: 10.1111/liv.13028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Aghoram R, Cai P, Dickinson JA. Alpha-foetoprotein and/or liver ultrasonography for screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:Cd002799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Llovet JM, Ducreux M, Lencioni R, et al. European association for the study of the liver, european organization for research and treatment of cancer, EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–1022. doi: 10.1002/hep.24199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Marrero JA, Feng Z, Wang Y, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:110–118. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Shen Q, Fan J, Yang XR, et al. Serum DKK1 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):817–826. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70233-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Mazon M, Masi D, Carreau M. Modulating Dickkopf-1: a strategy to monitor or treat cancer? Cancers (Basel). 2016;8:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Choi SH, Kim H, Lee HG, et al. Dickkopf-1 induces angiogenesis via VEGF receptor 2 regulation independent of the Wnt signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8(35):58974–58984. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.El-Serag HB, Marrero JA, Rudolph L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1752–1763. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, et al. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:1164–1171. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Raoul JL, Sangro B, Forner A, et al. Evolving strategies for the management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: available evidence and expert opinion on the use of transarterial chemoembolization. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Wu X, Yang C, Yu H, Cao F, Shan Y, Zhao W. The predictive values of serum dickkopf-1 and circulating tumor cells in evaluating the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(30):e16579. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Zhang HF, Wu C, Alshareef A, et al. The PI3K/AKT/c-MYC axis promotes the acquisition of cancer stem-like features in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2040–2051. doi: 10.1002/stem.2395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Agrawal N, Jiao Y, Bettegowda C, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:899–905. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Liang Y, Liu JL, Wu Y, Zhang ZY, Wu R. Cyclooxygenase-2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011;223:137–144. doi: 10.1620/tjem.223.137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Li S, Qin X, Liu B, et al. Dickkopf-1 is involved in invasive growth of esophageal cancer cells. J Mol Histol. 2011;42(6):491–498. doi: 10.1007/s10735-011-9347-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Begenik H, Kemik AS, Emre H, et al. The association between serum Dickkopf-1 levels and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014;33(8):785–788. doi: 10.1177/0960327113510537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Makino T, Yamasaki M, Takemasa I, et al. Dickkopf-1 expression as a marker for predicting clinical outcome in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):2058–2064. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0476-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Yada T, Yokoi C, Uemura N. The current state of diagnosis and treatment for early gastric cancer. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:241320. doi: 10.1155/2013/241320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2903–2909. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Lee HS, Lee HE, Park DJ, Kim HH, Kim WH, Park KU. Clinical significance of serum and tissue Dickkopf-1 levels in patients with gastric cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(21–22):1753–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Zhuang GF, Tan Y, Zeng JT, et al. Expression of serum Dickkopf-1 in gastric cancer patients. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2015;8(10):870–872. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2015.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Liu QR, Li YF, Deng ZQ, Cao JQ. Prognostic significance of Dickkopf-1 in gastric cancer survival: a meta-analysis. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2016;20(4):170–175. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2015.0154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Zhan T, Rindtorff N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(11):1461–1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Hong SA, Yoo SH, Lee HH, et al. Prognostic value of Dickkopf-1 and ß-catenin expression in advanced gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4420-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Wang B, Liu J, Ma LN, et al. Chimeric 5/35 adenovirus-mediated Dickkopf-1 overexpression suppressed tumorigenicity of CD44⁺ gastric cancer cells via attenuating Wnt signaling. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(7):798–808. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0711-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Ferrarelli LK. Treating WNT-driven colorectal cancer. Science. 2017;356(6345):1346–1348. doi: 10.1126/science.356.6345.1346-r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, He J. Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015;27:2–12. doi: 10.1186/s40880-015-0001-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Galamb O, Kalmar A, Peterfia B, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of WNT pathway genes in the development and progression of CIMP-negative colorectal cancer. Epigenetics. 2016;11(8):588–602. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1190894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Rennoll S, Yochum G. Regulation of MYC gene expression by aberrant Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer. World J Biol Chem. 2015;6(4):290–300. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v6.i4.290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:177–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Fan C, Lin Y, Mao Y, et al. MicroRNA-543 suppresses colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by targeting KRAS, MTA1 and HMGA2. Oncotarget. 2016;7:21825–21839. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Aguilera O, Fraga MF, Ballestar E, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the Wnt antagonist DICKKOPF-1 (DKK-1) gene in human colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25(29):4116–4121. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Rawson JB, Manno M, Mrkonjic M, et al. Promoter methylation of Wnt antagonists DKK1 and SFRP1 is associated with opposing tumor subtypes in two large populations of colorectal cancer patients. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(5):741–747. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Liu Z, Sun B, Qi L, et al. Dickkopf-1 expression is down-regulated during the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence and correlates with reduced microvessel density and VEGF expression. Histopathology. 2015;67(2):158–166. doi: 10.1111/his.12474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Jumpertz S, Hennes T, Asare Y, Schütz AK, Bernhagen J. CSN5/JAB1 suppresses the WNT inhibitor DKK1 in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2017;34:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Wang W, He Y, Rui J, Xu MQ. miR-410 acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer cells by targeting dickkopf-related protein 1 via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(1):807–814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Rui Y, Hu M, Wang P, et al. LncRNA HOTTIP mediated DKK1 downregulation confers metastasis and invasion in colorectal cancer cells. Histol Histopathol. 2019;34(6):619–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74.Stotz M, Eisner F, Szkandera J, et al. Clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome of different histological types of pancreatic cancer in a large Middle European series. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(9):753–757. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Klein AP. Identifying people at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(1):66–74. doi: 10.1038/nrc3420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1605–1617. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0901557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Takahashi N, Fukushima T, Yorita K, Tanaka H, Chijiiwa K, Kataoka H. Dickkopf-1 is overexpressed in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and is involved in invasive growth. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(7):1611–1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Zhong Y, Wang Z, Fu B, et al. GATA6 activates Wnt signaling in pancreatic cancer by negatively regulating the Wnt antagonist Dickkopf-1. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Han SX, Zhou X, Sui X, et al. Serum dickkopf-1 is a novel serological biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(23):19907–19917. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Liu DJ, Xie YX, Liu XX, et al. The role of Dickkopf-1 as a potential prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Cycle. 2017;16(17):1622–1629. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1356510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Tang Y, Zhang Z, Tang Y, Chen X, Zhou J. Identification of potential target genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by bioinformatics analysis. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(2):2453–2461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Pang EJ, Yang R, Fu XB, Liu YF. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA MALAT1 is correlated with clinical progression and unfavorable prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(4):2403–2407. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2850-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83.Weng YC, Ma J, Zhang J, Wang JC. Long non-coding RNA LINC01133 silencing exerts antioncogenic effect in pancreatic cancer through the methylation of DKK1 promoter and the activation of Wnt signaling pathway. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(3):368–380. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1529110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84.Kimura H, Yamamoto H, Harada T, et al. CKAP4, a DKK1 receptor, is a biomarker in exosomes derived from pancreatic cancer and a molecular target for therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(6):1936–1947. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86.Small W, Bacon MA, Bajaj A, et al. Cervical cancer: a global health crisis. Cancer. 2017;123(13):2404‐2412. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87.Kessler TA. Cervical cancer: prevention and early detection. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2017;33(2):172‐183. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Berman TA, Schiller JT. Human papillomavirus in cervical cancer and oropharyngeal cancer: one cause, two diseases. Cancer. 2017;123(12):2219–2229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Analytical BS, Barretos CH, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature. 2017;543(7645):378–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90.Lee J, Yoon YS, Chung JH. Epigenetic silencing of the WNT antagonist DICKKOPF-1 in cervical cancer cell lines. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(2):270‐274. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Jiang T, Wang S, Huang L, Zhang S. Clinical significance of serum DKK-1 in patients with gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(7):1177‐1181. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e31819d8b2d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92.Jiang T, Huang L, Zhang S. DKK-1 in serum as a clinical and prognostic factor in patients with cervical cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2013;28(2):221‐225. doi: 10.5301/jbm.5000005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Chi C, Li M, Hou W, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Chen J. Long noncoding RNA SNHG7 activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cervical cancer cells by epigenetically silencing DKK1. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2020. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2019.3004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7‐30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87‐108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Li X, Tang M, Zhu Q, Wang X, Lin Y, Wang X. The exosomal integrin α5β1/AEP complex derived from epithelial ovarian cancer cells promotes peritoneal metastasis through regulating mesothelial cell proliferation and migration. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2020;43(2):263‐277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97.Vaughan S, Coward JI, Bast RC, et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(10):719‐725. doi: 10.1038/nrc3144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98.Garrido MP, Bruneau N, Vega M, Selman A, Tapia JC, Romero C. Follicle-stimulating hormone promotes nerve growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in epithelial ovarian cells. Histol Histopathol. 2020;18226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99.Barbolina MV, Liu Y, Gurler H, et al. Matrix rigidity activates Wnt signaling through down-regulation of Dickkopf-1 protein. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(1):141–151. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.431411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100.Chen MW, Yang ST, Chien MH, et al. The STAT3-miRNA-92-Wnt signaling pathway regulates spheroid formation and malignant progression in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77(8):1955‐1967. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101.Kohli RM, Zhang Y. TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation. Nature. 2013;502(7472):472–479. doi: 10.1038/nature12750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102.Scourzic L, Mouly E, Bernard OA. TET proteins and the control of cytosine demethylation in cancer. Genome Med. 2015;7(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.Kraus TF, Greiner A, Steinmaurer M, Dietinger V, Guibourt V, Kretzschmar HA. Genetic characterization of ten-eleven-translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase alterations in human glioma. J Cancer. 2015;6(9):832‐842. doi: 10.7150/jca.12010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104.Rawłuszko-Wieczorek AA, Siera A, Horbacka K, Horst N, Krokowicz P, Jagodziński PP. Clinical significance of DNA methylation mRNA levels of TET family members in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(8):1379‐1392. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1901-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105.Duan H, Yan Z, Chen W, et al. TET1 inhibits EMT of ovarian cancer cells through activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibitors DKK1 and SFRP2. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147(2):408‐417. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106.Chang W, Lim S, Song H, et al. Cordycepin inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;597(1–3):64–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.08.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107.Nakamura K, Yoshikawa N, Yamaguchi Y, Kagota S, Shinozuka K, Kunitomo M. Antitumor effect of cordycepin (3ʹ-deoxyadenosine) on mouse melanoma and lung carcinoma cells involves adenosine A3 receptor stimulation. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(1A):43‐47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108.Shi P, Huang Z, Tan X, Chen G. Proteomic detection of changes in protein expression induced by cordycepin in human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2008;30(5):347‐353. doi: 10.1358/mf.2008.30.5.1186085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109.Jang HJ, Yang KE, Hwang IH, et al. Cordycepin inhibits human ovarian cancer by inducing autophagy and apoptosis through Dickkopf-related protein 1/β-catenin signaling. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(11):6890‐6906. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110.Betella I, Turbitt WJ, Szul T, et al. Wnt signaling modulator DKK1 as an immunotherapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111.Saad ED, Katz A, Buyse M. Overall survival and post-progression survival in advanced breast cancer: a review of recent randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1958–1962. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112.Gotay CC, Kawamoto CT, Bottomley A, Efficace F. The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1355–1363. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.3439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
113.Karaman S, Detmar M. Mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(3):922–928. doi: 10.1172/JCI71606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114.Voorzanger-Rousselot N, Journe F, Doriath V, Body JJ, Garnero P. Assessment of circulating Dickkopf-1 with a new two-site immunoassay in healthy subjects and women with breast cancer and bone metastases. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009;84(5):348–354. doi: 10.1007/s00223-009-9225-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115.Xu WH, Liu ZB, Yang C, Qin W, Shao ZM. Expression of dickkopf-1 and beta-catenin related to the prognosis of breast cancer patients with triple negative phenotype. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
116.Mariz K, Ingolf JB, Daniel H, Teresa NJ, Erich-Franz S. The Wnt inhibitor dickkopf-1: a link between breast cancer and bone metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015;32(8):857–866. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9750-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117.Rachner TD, Göbel A, Browne A, Hötzel J, Rauner M, Hofbauer LC. P38 regulates the Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;466(4):728–732. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118.Rachner TD, Göbel A, Thiele S, et al. Dickkopf-1 is regulated by the mevalonate pathway in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(1):R20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119.Göbel A, Browne AJ, Thiele S, Rauner M, Hofbauer LC, Rachner TD. Potentiated suppression of Dickkopf-1 in breast cancer by combined administration of the mevalonate pathway inhibitors zoledronic acid and statins. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154(3):623‐631. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3624-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
120.Li M, Cai H, Yang Y, et al. Perichondrium mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells via the DKK-1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(2):936–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
121.Liu JT, Guo WB, Sun JY. Serum Dickkopf-1 acts as a new biomarker in human breast cancer. Minerva Med. 2017;108(4):334‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
122.Kasoha M, Bohle RM, Seibold A, Gerlinger C, Juhasz-Böss I, Solomayer EF. Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) protein expression in breast cancer with special reference to bone metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018;35(8):763‐775. doi: 10.1007/s10585-018-9937-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123.Jaschke N, Kleymann A, Hofbauer LC, Göbel A, Rachner TD. Dorsomorphin: a novel inhibitor of Dickkopf-1 in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;524(2):360‐365. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.01.106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
124.Li K, Lin T, Xue W, et al.. Current status of diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer in China - analyses of Chinese Bladder Cancer Consortium database. Asian J Urol. 2015;2(2):63–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
125.Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, et al. Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):462–475. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
126.Knowles MA, Hurst CD. Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(1):25–41. doi: 10.1038/nrc3817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127.Kaba M, Pirincci N, Benli E, et al. Dickkopf-1 levels in Turkish patients with bladder cancer and its association with clinicopathological features. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(1):381‐384. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.1.381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128.Sun DK, Wang L, Wang JM, Zhang P. Serum Dickkopf-1 levels as a clinical and prognostic factor in patients with bladder cancer. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(4):18181–18187. doi: 10.4238/2015.December.23.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
129.Gao RL, Chen XR, Li YN, et al. Upregulation of miR-543-3p promotes growth and stem cell-like phenotype in bladder cancer by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10(9):9418–9426. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
130.Kagey MH, He X. Rationale for targeting the Wnt signalling modulator Dickkopf-1 for oncology. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(24):4637–4650. doi: 10.1111/bph.13894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0001] 1.Glinka A, Wu W, Delius H, Monaghan AP, Blumenstock C, Niehrs C. Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature. 1998;391:357–362. doi: 10.1038/34848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0002] 2.Krupnik VE, Sharp JD, Jiang C, et al. Functional and structural diversity of the human Dickkopf gene family. Gene. 1999;238:301–313. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00365-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0003] 3.Fedi P, Bafico A, Soria AN, et al. Isolation and biochemical characterization of the human Dkk-1 homologue, a novel inhibitor of mammalian Wnt signaling. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:19465–19472. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0004] 4.Li J, Gong W, Li X, et al. Recent progress of Wnt pathway inhibitor Dickkopf-1 in liver cancer. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2018;18(8):5192‐5206. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2018.14636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0005] 5.Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:781‐810. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0006] 6.Katoh M. WNT/PCP signaling pathway and human cancer (review). Oncol Rep. 2005;14(6):1583‐1588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0007] 7.MacDonald BT, Tamai K, He X. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Dev Cell. 2009;17(1):9–26. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0008] 8.Mao B, Wu W, Li Y, et al. LDL-receptor-related protein 6 is a receptor for Dickkopf proteins. Nature. 2001;411(6835):321‐325. doi: 10.1038/35077108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0009] 9.Bafico A, Liu G, Yaniv A, Gazit A, Aaronson SA. Novel mechanism of Wnt signalling inhibition mediated by Dickkopf-1 interaction with LRP6/Arrow. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(7):683‐686. doi: 10.1038/35083081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0010] 10.Lai SL, Chien AJ, Moon RT. Wnt/Fz signaling and the cytoskeleton: potential roles in tumorigenesis. Cell Res. 2009;19:532–545. doi: 10.1038/cr.2009.41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0011] 11.van Amerongen R, Nusse R. Towards an integrated view of Wnt signaling in development. Development. 2009;136:3205–3214. doi: 10.1242/dev.033910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0012] 12.Abrahamsson AE, Geron I, Gotlib J, et al. Glycogen synthase kinase 3beta missplicing contributes to leukemia stem cell generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:3925–3929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900189106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0013] 13.Valencia A, Román-Gómez J, Cervera J, et al. Wnt signaling pathway is epigenetically regulated by methylation of Wnt antagonists in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2009;23:1658–1666. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0014] 14.Roman-Gomez J, Cordeu L, Agirre X, et al. Epigenetic regulation of Wnt-signaling pathway in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2007;109:3462–3469. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-047043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0015] 15.Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature. 2012;487:330–337. doi: 10.1038/nature11252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0016] 16.Qin WX, Zhang HT, Yu YJ, et al. Uses of DKK-1 protein in diagnosis of cancer. Patent, WO/2007/104181 A1. 2007.

[cit0017] 17.Yu YJ, Wan XZ, Yu B, et al. Expression of Dickkopf (Dkk1) in liver cancer and in multiple human cancer cell lines. Zhongliu. 2006;26:1109–1112. [Google Scholar]

[cit0018] 18.Yu B, Yang X, Xu Y, et al. Elevated expression of Dkk1 is associated with cytoplasmic/nuclear β-catenin accumulation and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinomas. J Hepatol. 2009;50:948–957. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0019] 19.Sato N, Yamabuki T, Takano A, et al. Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 as a target for passive cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5326–5336. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3879 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0020] 20.Tung EK, Mak CK, Fatima S, et al. Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of serum and tissue Dickkopf-1 levels in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2011;31:1494–1504. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02597.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0021] 21.Maniotis AJ, Folberg R, Hess A, et al. Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:739–752. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65173-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0022] 22.Sun T, Zhao N, Zhao XL, et al. Expression and functional significance of Twist1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: its role in vasculogenic mimicry. Hepatology. 2010;51:545–556. doi: 10.1002/hep.23311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0023] 23.Zhang D, Sun B, Zhao X, et al. Twist1 expression induced by sunitinib accelerates tumor cell vasculogenic mimicry by increasing the population of CD133+ cells in triple‐negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:207. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0024] 24.Schnegg CI, Yang MH, Ghosh SK, et al. Induction of vasculogenic mimicry overrides VEGF‐A silencing and enriches stem‐like cancer cells in melanoma. Cancer Res. 2015;75:1682–1690. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0025] 25.Yang DH, Yoon JY, Lee SH, et al. Wnt5a is required for endothelial differentiation of embryonic stem cells and vascularization via pathways involving both Wnt/beta‐catenin and protein kinase Calpha. Circ Res. 2009;104:372–379. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.185405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0026] 26.Qi L, Sun B, Liu Z, et al. Dickkopf‐1 inhibits epithelial‐mesenchymal transition of colon cancer cells and contributes to colon cancer suppression. Cancer Sci. 2012;103:828–835. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2012.02222.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0027] 27.Yao L, Zhang D, Zhao X, et al. Dickkopf-1-promoted vasculogenic mimicry in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with EMT and development of a cancer stem-like cell phenotype. J Cell Mol Med. 2016;20(9):1673–1685. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0028] 28.Shen L, Wu X, Tan J, et al. Combined detection of dickkopf-1 subtype classification autoantibodies as biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:3545–3556. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S134162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0029] 29.Qiao R, Zhong R, Chang Q, et al. Serum dickkopf-1 as a clinical and prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer patients with bone metastases. Oncotarget. 2017;8(45):79469–79479. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0030] 30.Abdelaziz AO, Elbaz TM, Shousha HI, et al. Survival and prognostic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: an Egyptian multidisciplinary clinic experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:3915–3920. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.9.3915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0031] 31.Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N, et al. Asia-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int. 2017;11:317–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0032] 32.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0033] 33.Sangiovanni A, Colombo M. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond international guidelines. Liver Int. 2016;36(Suppl 1):124–129. doi: 10.1111/liv.13028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0034] 34.Aghoram R, Cai P, Dickinson JA. Alpha-foetoprotein and/or liver ultrasonography for screening of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:Cd002799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0035] 35.Llovet JM, Ducreux M, Lencioni R, et al. European association for the study of the liver, european organization for research and treatment of cancer, EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:908–943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0036] 36.Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–1022. doi: 10.1002/hep.24199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0037] 37.Marrero JA, Feng Z, Wang Y, et al. Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:110–118. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0038] 38.Shen Q, Fan J, Yang XR, et al. Serum DKK1 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):817–826. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70233-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0039] 39.Mazon M, Masi D, Carreau M. Modulating Dickkopf-1: a strategy to monitor or treat cancer? Cancers (Basel). 2016;8:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0040] 40.Choi SH, Kim H, Lee HG, et al. Dickkopf-1 induces angiogenesis via VEGF receptor 2 regulation independent of the Wnt signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8(35):58974–58984. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0041] 41.El-Serag HB, Marrero JA, Rudolph L, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1752–1763. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0042] 42.Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, et al. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2002;35:1164–1171. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.33156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0043] 43.Raoul JL, Sangro B, Forner A, et al. Evolving strategies for the management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: available evidence and expert opinion on the use of transarterial chemoembolization. Cancer Treat Rev. 2011;37:212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0044] 44.Wu X, Yang C, Yu H, Cao F, Shan Y, Zhao W. The predictive values of serum dickkopf-1 and circulating tumor cells in evaluating the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(30):e16579. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016579 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0045] 45.Zhang HF, Wu C, Alshareef A, et al. The PI3K/AKT/c-MYC axis promotes the acquisition of cancer stem-like features in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Stem Cells. 2016;34:2040–2051. doi: 10.1002/stem.2395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0046] 46.Agrawal N, Jiao Y, Bettegowda C, et al. Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:899–905. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0047] 47.Liang Y, Liu JL, Wu Y, Zhang ZY, Wu R. Cyclooxygenase-2 polymorphisms and susceptibility to esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011;223:137–144. doi: 10.1620/tjem.223.137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0048] 48.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0049] 49.Li S, Qin X, Liu B, et al. Dickkopf-1 is involved in invasive growth of esophageal cancer cells. J Mol Histol. 2011;42(6):491–498. doi: 10.1007/s10735-011-9347-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0050] 50.Begenik H, Kemik AS, Emre H, et al. The association between serum Dickkopf-1 levels and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2014;33(8):785–788. doi: 10.1177/0960327113510537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0051] 51.Makino T, Yamasaki M, Takemasa I, et al. Dickkopf-1 expression as a marker for predicting clinical outcome in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):2058–2064. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0476-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0052] 52.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0053] 53.Yada T, Yokoi C, Uemura N. The current state of diagnosis and treatment for early gastric cancer. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2013;2013:241320. doi: 10.1155/2013/241320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0054] 54.Wagner AD, Grothe W, Haerting J, Kleber G, Grothey A, Fleig WE. Chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on aggregate data. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(18):2903–2909. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.0245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0055] 55.Lee HS, Lee HE, Park DJ, Kim HH, Kim WH, Park KU. Clinical significance of serum and tissue Dickkopf-1 levels in patients with gastric cancer. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;413(21–22):1753–1760. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0056] 56.Zhuang GF, Tan Y, Zeng JT, et al. Expression of serum Dickkopf-1 in gastric cancer patients. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2015;8(10):870–872. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2015.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0057] 57.Liu QR, Li YF, Deng ZQ, Cao JQ. Prognostic significance of Dickkopf-1 in gastric cancer survival: a meta-analysis. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2016;20(4):170–175. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2015.0154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0058] 58.Zhan T, Rindtorff N, Boutros M. Wnt signaling in cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36(11):1461–1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0059] 59.Hong SA, Yoo SH, Lee HH, et al. Prognostic value of Dickkopf-1 and ß-catenin expression in advanced gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4420-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0060] 60.Wang B, Liu J, Ma LN, et al. Chimeric 5/35 adenovirus-mediated Dickkopf-1 overexpression suppressed tumorigenicity of CD44⁺ gastric cancer cells via attenuating Wnt signaling. J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(7):798–808. doi: 10.1007/s00535-012-0711-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0061] 61.Ferrarelli LK. Treating WNT-driven colorectal cancer. Science. 2017;356(6345):1346–1348. doi: 10.1126/science.356.6345.1346-r [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0062] 62.Chen W, Zheng R, Zeng H, Zhang S, He J. Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2011. Chin J Cancer Res. 2015;27:2–12. doi: 10.1186/s40880-015-0001-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0063] 63.Galamb O, Kalmar A, Peterfia B, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of WNT pathway genes in the development and progression of CIMP-negative colorectal cancer. Epigenetics. 2016;11(8):588–602. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2016.1190894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0064] 64.Rennoll S, Yochum G. Regulation of MYC gene expression by aberrant Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in colorectal cancer. World J Biol Chem. 2015;6(4):290–300. doi: 10.4331/wjbc.v6.i4.290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0065] 65.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:177–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0066] 66.Fan C, Lin Y, Mao Y, et al. MicroRNA-543 suppresses colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by targeting KRAS, MTA1 and HMGA2. Oncotarget. 2016;7:21825–21839. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0067] 67.Aguilera O, Fraga MF, Ballestar E, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of the Wnt antagonist DICKKOPF-1 (DKK-1) gene in human colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2006;25(29):4116–4121. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0068] 68.Rawson JB, Manno M, Mrkonjic M, et al. Promoter methylation of Wnt antagonists DKK1 and SFRP1 is associated with opposing tumor subtypes in two large populations of colorectal cancer patients. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(5):741–747. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0069] 69.Liu Z, Sun B, Qi L, et al. Dickkopf-1 expression is down-regulated during the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence and correlates with reduced microvessel density and VEGF expression. Histopathology. 2015;67(2):158–166. doi: 10.1111/his.12474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0070] 70.Jumpertz S, Hennes T, Asare Y, Schütz AK, Bernhagen J. CSN5/JAB1 suppresses the WNT inhibitor DKK1 in colorectal cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2017;34:38–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0071] 71.Wang W, He Y, Rui J, Xu MQ. miR-410 acts as an oncogene in colorectal cancer cells by targeting dickkopf-related protein 1 via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(1):807–814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0072] 72.Rui Y, Hu M, Wang P, et al. LncRNA HOTTIP mediated DKK1 downregulation confers metastasis and invasion in colorectal cancer cells. Histol Histopathol. 2019;34(6):619–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0073] 73.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0074] 74.Stotz M, Eisner F, Szkandera J, et al. Clinico-pathological characteristics and clinical outcome of different histological types of pancreatic cancer in a large Middle European series. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(9):753–757. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0075] 75.Klein AP. Identifying people at a high risk of developing pancreatic cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13(1):66–74. doi: 10.1038/nrc3420 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0076] 76.Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(17):1605–1617. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0901557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0077] 77.Takahashi N, Fukushima T, Yorita K, Tanaka H, Chijiiwa K, Kataoka H. Dickkopf-1 is overexpressed in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and is involved in invasive growth. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(7):1611–1620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0078] 78.Zhong Y, Wang Z, Fu B, et al. GATA6 activates Wnt signaling in pancreatic cancer by negatively regulating the Wnt antagonist Dickkopf-1. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0079] 79.Han SX, Zhou X, Sui X, et al. Serum dickkopf-1 is a novel serological biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6(23):19907–19917. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0080] 80.Liu DJ, Xie YX, Liu XX, et al. The role of Dickkopf-1 as a potential prognostic marker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cell Cycle. 2017;16(17):1622–1629. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1356510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0081] 81.Tang Y, Zhang Z, Tang Y, Chen X, Zhou J. Identification of potential target genes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by bioinformatics analysis. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(2):2453–2461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0082] 82.Pang EJ, Yang R, Fu XB, Liu YF. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA MALAT1 is correlated with clinical progression and unfavorable prognosis in pancreatic cancer. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(4):2403–2407. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2850-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0083] 83.Weng YC, Ma J, Zhang J, Wang JC. Long non-coding RNA LINC01133 silencing exerts antioncogenic effect in pancreatic cancer through the methylation of DKK1 promoter and the activation of Wnt signaling pathway. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(3):368–380. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1529110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0084] 84.Kimura H, Yamamoto H, Harada T, et al. CKAP4, a DKK1 receptor, is a biomarker in exosomes derived from pancreatic cancer and a molecular target for therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(6):1936–1947. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0085] 85.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394‐424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0086] 86.Small W, Bacon MA, Bajaj A, et al. Cervical cancer: a global health crisis. Cancer. 2017;123(13):2404‐2412. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0087] 87.Kessler TA. Cervical cancer: prevention and early detection. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2017;33(2):172‐183. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0088] 88.Berman TA, Schiller JT. Human papillomavirus in cervical cancer and oropharyngeal cancer: one cause, two diseases. Cancer. 2017;123(12):2219–2229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0089] 89.Analytical BS, Barretos CH, Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic and molecular characterization of cervical cancer. Nature. 2017;543(7645):378–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0090] 90.Lee J, Yoon YS, Chung JH. Epigenetic silencing of the WNT antagonist DICKKOPF-1 in cervical cancer cell lines. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109(2):270‐274. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0091] 91.Jiang T, Wang S, Huang L, Zhang S. Clinical significance of serum DKK-1 in patients with gynecological cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(7):1177‐1181. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e31819d8b2d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0092] 92.Jiang T, Huang L, Zhang S. DKK-1 in serum as a clinical and prognostic factor in patients with cervical cancer. Int J Biol Markers. 2013;28(2):221‐225. doi: 10.5301/jbm.5000005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0093] 93.Chi C, Li M, Hou W, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Chen J. Long noncoding RNA SNHG7 activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cervical cancer cells by epigenetically silencing DKK1. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2020. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2019.3004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0094] 94.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7‐30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0095] 95.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(2):87‐108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0096] 96.Li X, Tang M, Zhu Q, Wang X, Lin Y, Wang X. The exosomal integrin α5β1/AEP complex derived from epithelial ovarian cancer cells promotes peritoneal metastasis through regulating mesothelial cell proliferation and migration. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2020;43(2):263‐277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0097] 97.Vaughan S, Coward JI, Bast RC, et al. Rethinking ovarian cancer: recommendations for improving outcomes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(10):719‐725. doi: 10.1038/nrc3144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0098] 98.Garrido MP, Bruneau N, Vega M, Selman A, Tapia JC, Romero C. Follicle-stimulating hormone promotes nerve growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in epithelial ovarian cells. Histol Histopathol. 2020;18226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0099] 99.Barbolina MV, Liu Y, Gurler H, et al. Matrix rigidity activates Wnt signaling through down-regulation of Dickkopf-1 protein. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(1):141–151. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.431411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0100] 100.Chen MW, Yang ST, Chien MH, et al. The STAT3-miRNA-92-Wnt signaling pathway regulates spheroid formation and malignant progression in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77(8):1955‐1967. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0101] 101.Kohli RM, Zhang Y. TET enzymes, TDG and the dynamics of DNA demethylation. Nature. 2013;502(7472):472–479. doi: 10.1038/nature12750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0102] 102.Scourzic L, Mouly E, Bernard OA. TET proteins and the control of cytosine demethylation in cancer. Genome Med. 2015;7(1):9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0103] 103.Kraus TF, Greiner A, Steinmaurer M, Dietinger V, Guibourt V, Kretzschmar HA. Genetic characterization of ten-eleven-translocation methylcytosine dioxygenase alterations in human glioma. J Cancer. 2015;6(9):832‐842. doi: 10.7150/jca.12010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0104] 104.Rawłuszko-Wieczorek AA, Siera A, Horbacka K, Horst N, Krokowicz P, Jagodziński PP. Clinical significance of DNA methylation mRNA levels of TET family members in colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141(8):1379‐1392. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1901-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0105] 105.Duan H, Yan Z, Chen W, et al. TET1 inhibits EMT of ovarian cancer cells through activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibitors DKK1 and SFRP2. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;147(2):408‐417. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0106] 106.Chang W, Lim S, Song H, et al. Cordycepin inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;597(1–3):64–69. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.08.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0107] 107.Nakamura K, Yoshikawa N, Yamaguchi Y, Kagota S, Shinozuka K, Kunitomo M. Antitumor effect of cordycepin (3ʹ-deoxyadenosine) on mouse melanoma and lung carcinoma cells involves adenosine A3 receptor stimulation. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(1A):43‐47. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0108] 108.Shi P, Huang Z, Tan X, Chen G. Proteomic detection of changes in protein expression induced by cordycepin in human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2008;30(5):347‐353. doi: 10.1358/mf.2008.30.5.1186085 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0109] 109.Jang HJ, Yang KE, Hwang IH, et al. Cordycepin inhibits human ovarian cancer by inducing autophagy and apoptosis through Dickkopf-related protein 1/β-catenin signaling. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(11):6890‐6906. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0110] 110.Betella I, Turbitt WJ, Szul T, et al. Wnt signaling modulator DKK1 as an immunotherapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0111] 111.Saad ED, Katz A, Buyse M. Overall survival and post-progression survival in advanced breast cancer: a review of recent randomized clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1958–1962. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.5414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0112] 112.Gotay CC, Kawamoto CT, Bottomley A, Efficace F. The prognostic significance of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1355–1363. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.3439 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0113] 113.Karaman S, Detmar M. Mechanisms of lymphatic metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(3):922–928. doi: 10.1172/JCI71606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0114] 114.Voorzanger-Rousselot N, Journe F, Doriath V, Body JJ, Garnero P. Assessment of circulating Dickkopf-1 with a new two-site immunoassay in healthy subjects and women with breast cancer and bone metastases. Calcif Tissue Int. 2009;84(5):348–354. doi: 10.1007/s00223-009-9225-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0115] 115.Xu WH, Liu ZB, Yang C, Qin W, Shao ZM. Expression of dickkopf-1 and beta-catenin related to the prognosis of breast cancer patients with triple negative phenotype. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0116] 116.Mariz K, Ingolf JB, Daniel H, Teresa NJ, Erich-Franz S. The Wnt inhibitor dickkopf-1: a link between breast cancer and bone metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015;32(8):857–866. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9750-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0117] 117.Rachner TD, Göbel A, Browne A, Hötzel J, Rauner M, Hofbauer LC. P38 regulates the Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;466(4):728–732. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0118] 118.Rachner TD, Göbel A, Thiele S, et al. Dickkopf-1 is regulated by the mevalonate pathway in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(1):R20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0119] 119.Göbel A, Browne AJ, Thiele S, Rauner M, Hofbauer LC, Rachner TD. Potentiated suppression of Dickkopf-1 in breast cancer by combined administration of the mevalonate pathway inhibitors zoledronic acid and statins. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;154(3):623‐631. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3624-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0120] 120.Li M, Cai H, Yang Y, et al. Perichondrium mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the growth of breast cancer cells via the DKK-1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(2):936–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0121] 121.Liu JT, Guo WB, Sun JY. Serum Dickkopf-1 acts as a new biomarker in human breast cancer. Minerva Med. 2017;108(4):334‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0122] 122.Kasoha M, Bohle RM, Seibold A, Gerlinger C, Juhasz-Böss I, Solomayer EF. Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) protein expression in breast cancer with special reference to bone metastases. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2018;35(8):763‐775. doi: 10.1007/s10585-018-9937-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0123] 123.Jaschke N, Kleymann A, Hofbauer LC, Göbel A, Rachner TD. Dorsomorphin: a novel inhibitor of Dickkopf-1 in breast cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;524(2):360‐365. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.01.106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0124] 124.Li K, Lin T, Xue W, et al.. Current status of diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer in China - analyses of Chinese Bladder Cancer Consortium database. Asian J Urol. 2015;2(2):63–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0125] 125.Alfred Witjes J, Lebret T, Compérat EM, et al. Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):462–475. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0126] 126.Knowles MA, Hurst CD. Molecular biology of bladder cancer: new insights into pathogenesis and clinical diversity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(1):25–41. doi: 10.1038/nrc3817 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0127] 127.Kaba M, Pirincci N, Benli E, et al. Dickkopf-1 levels in Turkish patients with bladder cancer and its association with clinicopathological features. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(1):381‐384. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.1.381 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0128] 128.Sun DK, Wang L, Wang JM, Zhang P. Serum Dickkopf-1 levels as a clinical and prognostic factor in patients with bladder cancer. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(4):18181–18187. doi: 10.4238/2015.December.23.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0129] 129.Gao RL, Chen XR, Li YN, et al. Upregulation of miR-543-3p promotes growth and stem cell-like phenotype in bladder cancer by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017;10(9):9418–9426. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[cit0130] 130.Kagey MH, He X. Rationale for targeting the Wnt signalling modulator Dickkopf-1 for oncology. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(24):4637–4650. doi: 10.1111/bph.13894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Expression and Role of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) in Tumors: From the Cells to the Patients

Guohua Zhu

Jukun Song

Weimin Chen

Dongbo Yuan

Wei Wang

Xiaoyue Chen

Hen Liu

Hao Su

Jianguo Zhu

Abstract

Introduction

Expression of Dkk1 in Lung Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Expression of Dkk1 in Esophageal Carcinoma

Expression of Dkk1 in Gastric Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Colorectal Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Pancreatic Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Cervical Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Ovarian Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Breast Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Bladder Urothelial Cancer

Discussion

Figure 1.

Table 1.

Figure 2.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

Disclosure

References

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Cite

Add to Collections

PERMALINK

Expression and Role of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) in Tumors: From the Cells to the Patients

Guohua Zhu

Jukun Song

Weimin Chen

Dongbo Yuan

Wei Wang

Xiaoyue Chen

Hen Liu

Hao Su

Jianguo Zhu

Abstract

Introduction

Expression of Dkk1 in Lung Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Expression of Dkk1 in Esophageal Carcinoma

Expression of Dkk1 in Gastric Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Colorectal Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Pancreatic Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Cervical Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Ovarian Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Breast Cancer

Expression of Dkk1 in Bladder Urothelial Cancer

Discussion

Figure 1.

Table 1.

Figure 2.

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

Disclosure

References

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases