TABLE 4.
Specification of fixed effects for final models for each predictor variable. All models included a random couple intercept to account for nesting of contexts in couples.
| Predictor | Final model |
| Love | Profile contexti, dyad j = π0j + π20 (Average love) + π30 (Partner difference in love) |
| Conflict | Profile contexti, dyad j = π0j + π20 (Average conflict) + π30 (Partner difference in conflict) |
| Sexual satisfaction | Profile contexti, dyad j = π0j + π10 (Context) + π20 (Average sex satisfaction) + π30 (Partner difference in sex satisfaction) + π40 (Context) × (Average sex satisfaction) |
| Commitment | Profile contexti, dyad j = π0j + π10 (Context) + π20 (Average commitment) + π30 (Partner difference in commitment) + π40 (Context) × (Average commitment) |
| Relationship length | Profile contexti, dyad j = π0j + π10 (Context) + π20 (Relationship length) |