Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;11:614774. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614774

TABLE 2.

Descriptive results for teachers’ psychological well-being, affect, and creative resources during the 2020 spring term of distance learning (N = 35).

Teacher factor α Mean (SD) Min Max
Creative self-efficacy in teaching 0.89 4.27 (0.79) 2.67 6.00
Environmental support for creativity 0.80 3.82 (0.94) 1.40 6.00
Growth creative mindset 0.92 5.24 (0.67) 3.50 6.00
Need for closure facing ambiguity in teaching 0.80 2.74 (0.87) 1.20 5.40
Fixed creative mindset 0.89 1.67 (0.67) 1.00 3.00
Creative anxiety 0.87 2.12 (0.83) 1.00 4.00
Experience of positive affect 0.91 4.10 (0.54) 2.75 5.00
Dispositional joy in teaching 0.94 4.56 (0.75) 2.89 6.00
Buoyancy in teaching 0.93 3.82 (0.98) 1.00 6.00
Experience of negative affect 0.84 2.51 (0.77) 1.00 4.50
Secondary traumatic stress–avoidance, intrusion, arousal 0.94 2.55 (0.88) 1.00 5.00

Creative self-efficacy, environmental support, growth and fixed creative mindsets, need for closure, dispositional joy, and buoyancy subscales are on a 1–6 response scale from “disagree” to “agree.” secondary traumatic stress are on a 1–5 frequency scale from “never” to “very often.” Experience of positive and negative affect and creative anxiety subscales are on a 1–5 emphasis scale from “very slightly” to “extremely.”