Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 Jul 14;20(9):39. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01063-1

Primary Age-Related Tauopathy (PART): Addressing the Spectrum of Neuronal Tauopathic Changes in the Aging Brain

Richard A Hickman 1, Xena E Flowers 1, Thomas Wisniewski 2
PMCID: PMC7849162  NIHMSID: NIHMS1663743  PMID: 32666342

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Primary age-related tauopathy (PART) was recently proposed as a pathologic diagnosis for brains that harbor neurofibrillary tangles (Braak stage ≤ 4) with little, if any, amyloid burden. We sought to review the clinicopathologic findings related to PART.

Recent Findings

Most adult human brains show at least focal tauopathic changes, and the majority of individuals with PART do not progress to dementia. Older age and cognitive impairment correlate with increased Braak stage, and multivariate analyses suggest that the rate of cognitive decline is less than matched patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). It remains unclear whether PART is a distinct tauopathic entity separate from AD or rather represents an earlier histologic stage of AD.

Summary

Cognitive decline in PART is usually milder than AD and correlates with tauopathic burden. Biomarker and ligand-based radiologic studies will be important to define PART antemortem and prospectively follow its natural history.

Keywords: Primary age-related tauopathy, PART, Aging, Tauopathy, Tangle-only dementia, Alzheimer disease

Introduction

In 2008, den Dunnen and colleagues described the extraordinary neuropathologic findings of a 115-year-old woman who died of metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma [1]. Despite her advanced age, the brain showed no evidence of neurodegenerative disease nor cerebrovascular injury, but instead displayed neurofibrillary tangles (NFT) in the brainstem, amygdala, and transentorhinal and entorhinal cortices with minimal neocortical involvement. At nearly 114 years of age, her mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scored 26/30 and her remaining neuropsychiatric tests revealed performances that were superior to many 60- to 75-year-olds. The authors’ conclusions were that cognitive functions may extend beyond the usual lifespan and that neurodegenerative diseases of the brain are not inevitable.

This supercentenarian was exceptional, but while she was fortunate to evade neurodegeneration despite her longevity, the burden of dementia for aging societies is continuing to increase [24]. Examination of brains over the age of 75 years often reveals overlapping pathologic findings with that of neurodegenerative disorders, yet a subset of these individuals never manifest a neurological disorder [58]. Separating the usual histologic findings of healthy brain aging from that which are clinicopathologic can therefore be challenging, and this is exemplified in centenarian neuropathological studies that reveal a vast gamut of pathological hallmarks of various neurodegenerative diseases despite having apparently normal cognition [911].

One neuropathologic finding that intersects between healthy aging and dementia is the NFT. NFT are filamentous inclusions that are found within neurons and are comprised of aggregates of hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) [12, 13]. Comprehensive histopathologic studies of post-mortem brains reveal p-tau aggregates in the majority of adult brains, being almost always detected within the locus coeruleus [14, 15••, 1619]. Furthermore, aggregation of p-tau is not a feature of a specific neurodegenerative disorder but can be found in ganglionic tumors, post-infectious states (e.g., subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE)), metabolic diseases such as Niemann–Pick C disease, and following trauma, as in chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) [2024]. Aggregates of p-tau are therefore common, increase with age, and, as an isolated biochemical finding, are somewhat non-specific to an etiology. Thus, accurate diagnosis and understanding of the disease process benefits from the clinical context as well as recognition of which cell types are affected by the tauopathy and the regional distribution of tauopathic burden within the brain.

For decades, it had been realized that there were many individuals with a clinical diagnosis of AD, yet at post-mortem examination, tauopathic changes were seen with minimal, if any, neuritic plaques [2527]. In the absence of neuritic plaques, these brains could not be diagnosed as AD, and so to fill this diagnostic void, the terms “tangle-only dementia,” “neurofibrillary predominant dementia,” “senile dementia of the neurofibrillary tangle type,” and “senile dementia of the tangle type” were used [2630]. Confusion then arose when it was realized that there were many aged brains that also harbored a similar p-tau aggregation pattern but without significant cognitive decline. This was further compounded when it became recognized how frequent intermediate Braak stage tauopathic changes were in the absence of plaques in autopsy series, a frequency that has been suggested to be between 2 and 10% of examined brains [31••]. In light of these challenges and to draw attention to this phenomenon, a group of experts in the field synthesized the literature and reached a consensus in formulating the concept of primary age-related tauopathy (PART) [31••]. This review explores the pathologic characteristics of PART and the recent developments of the clinical associations of this phenotype and discusses some of the controversies relating to the diagnostic entity.

Morphologic Features and Diagnostic Criteria

Currently, the gold standard method for the diagnosis of PART is post-mortem histological examination of the brain. Assignment of PART is independent of the antemortem cognitive status and consequently does not require knowledge of the presence or absence of dementia. Cases that were previously assigned as tangle-only dementia can therefore be designated as PART.

The macroscopic findings of PART are variable, but often no significant abnormalities are detectable in the brain for the individual’s age (Fig. 1a, b). In some instances, however, there may be visible mesial temporal lobe atrophy, and in fewer cases, there could be more widespread cerebral atrophy [28, 31••, 32, 33]. Microscopically, NFT are found in many of the same regions that are commonly afflicted in AD, but with minimal-to-absent involvement of the neocortex. Certain vulnerable subcortical nuclei are commonly involved with NFT, and attention is particularly drawn to the locus coeruleus, dorsal raphé nucleus, nucleus basalis of Meynert, and the amygdala [26]. Involvement of the cerebral cortex is concentrated within the medial temporal lobe where tangles are found in the parahippocampal gyrus, the ambient gyrus, and within the hippocampal sectors (Fig. 1d, ik). The insular cortex is also affected. With this distribution in mind, the AD Braak staging system for NFT is used to document the extent of tauopathic changes in PART, and, hence, these brains range between Braak stages I–II (transentorhinal) and III–IV (limbic) [34]. Older individuals have higher Braak stages implying a stepwise progression of NFT in a similar fashion to AD [31••, 35••]. Within the hippocampal formation, both intracellular and extracellular (“ghost”) tangles may be found and, in severe cases, there may be spongiosis of the parahippocampal cortex [32]. However, the tauopathic burden in PART within the hippocampus appears to have a different pattern of distribution to that seen in classical AD. In contrast to AD, the CA2 subfield frequently harbors greater tauopathic burden than the adjacent CA1 sector in PART (Fig. 1e, f vs. m, n), which is a pattern that is also seen in CTE [26, 32, 36•, 37, 38]. Furthermore, there is a variable degree of tauopathic burden within the remaining hippocampal CA subfields, and the den-tate gyrus can be relatively spared [32].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Comparisons between definite PART of an 83-year-old woman (ad, im) and AD neuropathologic changes (ADNC) [A3, B3, C3] of a 71-year-old man (eh, nr). a The brain was diffusely small with a whole fresh brain weight of 992.5 g. The left half brain shows no visible atrophy for age. b Likewise, a coronal section at the level of the lateral geniculate body shows no discernable cortical atrophy on cut section of the frontal, parietal, or temporal lobes. The subjacent white matter, thalamus, and hippocampal formation appears normal. c Luxol fast blue counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin (LH&E)–stained section shows no abnormalities in the hippocampal formation with a well-myelinated alveus and fimbria. d AT8 (p-tau) immunostained section of the hippocampal formation showing limited tauopathic burden within the parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) with less staining in the subiculum, CA2, and CA1 regions and the least labeling in the occipitotemporal gyrus (OTG). The boxes indicate the regions photographed in il. e In stark contrast to the brain with PART, this left half brain with AD shows severe frontotemporal atrophy with moderate parietal atrophy. f This frontotemporal atrophy is further shown in a coronal section of the left half brain at the level of the lateral geniculate body. There is white matter atrophy and widening of the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle that is associated with moderate hippocampal and mesial temporal atrophy. g An LH&E-stained section of the hippocampal formation shows atrophy and widening of the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle. h An AT8 immunostain shows widespread p-tau immunolabeling afflicting all hippocampal sectors and extending beyond the PHG to include the OTG. i, j More pyramidal neurons are tau-labeled in CA2 than in CA1 in this case of PART. k, l Many AT8-labeled neurons are seen in layer II of the parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) whereas few neurons (layer V shown) label in the OTG. m No plaques are seen in the supragranular layers of the OTG with a beta-amyloid immunostain in this case of PART. n, o Many tau-positive neurons and abundant neuropil threads are seen in CA2 (n) and CA1 (o) with more neurons labeling in CA1 than CA2 in this case of AD. p, q The tauopathic burden of AT8-labeled neurons and widespread neuropil threads are seen throughout the PHG (p) and the OTG (q). r Parenchymal amyloid plaques are highlighted by a beta-amyloid immunostain in layer II of the OTG of AD. Scale bar 50 μm

For a diagnosis of PART to be rendered, the amyloid burden should be low, if present at all, with a maximum Thal phase of 2. As would be expected with this prerequisite, cerebral amyloid angiopathy is infrequently seen [32]. A further distinction of PART is to discriminate brains with amyloid plaques from those without plaques by using the terms “possible PART” and “definite PART,” respectively (Table 1) [39]. In the original paper by Crary et al. and by others, it was recognized that as the Braak stage increased, the ratio of possible PART:definite PART increased and higher densities of amyloid plaques are seen with greater Braak stages [31••, 40••, 41]. For that reason, when pathologists are faced with the scenario of limbic Braak stages (III–IV) in the absence of amyloid plaques, one should consider FTLD-tau in their differential diagnosis, especially if the patient is in the younger age range [42].

Table 1.

Clinicopathologic designations of PART in relation to cognitive status and pathologic findings

Amyloid phase/clinical No signs of cognitive decline Cognitive decline/dementia
Thai 0 Asymptomatic, definite PART Symptomatic, definite PART
Thai 1–2 Asymptomatic, possible PART Symptomatic, possible PART

Other Associated Histologic Findings in PART

Since the histological findings of PART are strongly associated with aging, other age-related pathologies may coexist in these brains. Indeed, mixed brain pathologies are frequently seen in dementias [4345]. Tau-immunoreactive astrocytes are sometimes found in PART and may comprise clusters of thorn-shaped astrocytes in gray/white matter (aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG)) or foci of tufted astrocytes/astrocytic plaques [32, 46]. Tau-labeled oligodendroglial inclusions (“coiled bodies”) have also been described [32]. When tufted astrocytes are widespread, the differential diagnosis should include progressive supranuclear palsy, or corticobasal degeneration when extensive astrocytic plaques are found.

Argyrophilic grains are also found with increasing frequency in the aging brain. One series found argyrophilic grain disease in 31% of brains with definite PART [35••, 4749]. Small-to-moderate amounts of argyrophilic grains should not exclude the diagnosis of PART [31••].

Hippocampal sclerosis (HS) may be found in up to 10% of brains with PART, and this may be associated with phosphorylated TDP-43 pathology [32, 35••, 50]. As has been described in many neurodegenerative diseases and in aging, phosphorylated TDP-43 has also been reported in PART in approximately 30% of cases [35••, 42, 5153]. This frequency is generally lower than that seen in AD (ranging from 36 to 74% of AD cases) [5456]. The distribution of TDP-43-related changes mostly involves the limbic system, especially the amygdala, but may reach stage 3 of the TDP-43 staging system as proposed by Josephs et al. [35••, 57]. Another study reviewing TDP-43 abnormalities in PART described more extensive TDP-43 abnormalities with a few cases showing mild TDP-43 proteinopathy in the frontal and parietal neocortex [58].

While Lewy bodies (LB) are seen in PART, they are uncommon and seen at a frequency analogous to incidental LB of aging cohorts (6%) and at far lower occurrence that usually seen in AD (19–57%) [35••, 56, 5961].

Finally, cerebrovascular disease is seen frequently in this aged cohort. Jellinger and Attems reported that over half of patients (54%) with neurofibrillary tangle predominant dementia harbored infarcts and were often striatal lacunes [32]. This frequency is comparable with that seen in other dementia cohorts [6264].

Clinical Features

There are numerous clinical descriptions of the entity that is now referred to as PART, and a summary of the clinical findings from selected publications is provided in Table 2. Many of these accounts are largely consistent, whereas other reports, particularly of the more recent neuropsychiatric data, show conflicting data.

Table 2.

Summary of selected articles with clinical findings for individuals with a post-mortem diagnosis of PART

Article [reference] Study design Average age (years) Sex (% women) Summary of neuropsychiatric findings Other
Reports prior to Crary et al. (2014) consensus paper
 Ulrich, 1992 [27] Retrospective clinicopathologic series of individuals with TOD (n = 10) 89.6 80 Five of the women were severely demented, two women suffered from a “psycho-organic syndrome,” one was disoriented and the two men experienced psychotic episodes at the end of life. N/A
 Bancher et al., 1994 [28] Retrospective clinicopathologic study of brains with NTT but no amyloid plaque (n = 10) 89.6 80 Seven had a clinical diagnosis of probable AD; 3 with possible AD
Two patients had paranoid symptoms/ depression
Two had extrapyramidal signs
 Ikeda et al., 1999 [30] Retrospective clinicopathologic series of individuals with TOD (n = 4) 89 50 Gradual, progressive long-term memory loss, relative preservation of personality and cognitive function. Psychotic symptoms described in a subset of cases
 Nelson et al., 2009 [65] Retrospective clinicopathologic study (n = 26) with separate demographic data from the NACC registry (n = 219) 88.5 (n = 26) 46 (n = 26) 21 of the 26 individuals had normal cognition; 4 were diagnosed with AD and 1 with MCI
Mean MMSE 26.5
Crary et al. (2014) consensus paper and reports since
 Crary et al., 2014 [31••] Review of the literature and consensus on PART Mean range (Table 1 of paper) 77.0–92.0 Variable—some individuals may have amnestic symptoms
 Josephs et al., 2017 [35••] Retrospective clinicopathologic study of definite PART (n = 52); a subset with neuroimaging 88 at death (IQR 82–92) 56 Median MMSE 28/30
Relative sparing of episodic memory
Poorer performances of executive functioning, cognitive speed, visuospatial abilities with increasing Braak stage
8% ApoE ε4 frequency
Left anterior hippocampal atrophy
 Jefterson-George et al., 2017 [66] Retrospective clinicopathologic study of definite and possible PART from the NACC database (n = 226) Median age ranged from 84 to 92 50 Poorer performance of semantic memory
Poorer performance of cognitive speed and language ability with increasing Braak stage
N/A
 Besser et al., 2017 [67] Using the NACC registry to describe the clinicopathologic features of definite PART (n = 170) and cases with sparse amyloid (n = 207). N/A 53 Definite PART participants were less frequently symptomatic than amyloid sparse individuals. Predictors of symptoms in the definite PART category included a history of depression, stroke and Braak stage.
 Bell et al., 2018 [68] Retrospective study comparing the clinicopathologic and genetic status of age-matched individuals with PART versus AD (n = 183) Individuals with PART have a slower antemortem rate of decline in memory, language and visuospatial ability than patients with AD. Frequency of ApoE ε4 is lower in PART (4.1%) than in AD (17.6%)
 Besser et al., 2019 [41] Retrospective comparison of neuropsychological test scores of individuals with PART (n = 426) and individuals with AD (n = 510) using the NACC registry Majority were 80 and older 53 Definite PART had relative sparing of semantic memory and language compared with AD when matched by clinical dementia rating (CDR).
When matched for CDR 0.5–1.0, definite PART had relative sparing of memory compared with AD.
When matched for CDR 2.0–3.0, definite PART had relative sparing of attention.
There were no significant differences in the cognitive domains between possible PART and AD
N/A
 Teylan et al., 2019 [69] Retrospective clinicopathologic study to assess clinical diagnosis of patients with cognitive impairment using NACC database of brains with PART (n = 161) and AD with moderate/ severe neuritic plaques (n = 1193). 83.1 42 Fewer patients with PART were diagnosed as AD in life compared with patients with AD. Only half of patients with dementia and PART were assigned a diagnosis of AD and were instead given a range of diagnoses including vascular brain injury (17.0%), primary progressive aphasia/bvFTD (12.5%) Lower frequency of ApoE ε4 in PART than AD neuropathology
 Teylan et al., 2020 [70•] Retrospective clinicopathologic study of individuals with a baseline CDR 0.5 and comparing the rate of cognitive decline between PART (n = 126) and AD (n = 452) using NACC registry 86.1 48 Individuals with PART have slower cognitive decline than AD in all cognitive domains in a global composite score and with CDR-sum of boxes. Frequency of ApoE ε4 is lower in PART (13.7%) than in AD (48.8%)

Before the 2014 consensus paper, the early descriptions of PART focused on patients with dementia, thus representing the more severe clinical aspect of the PART spectrum. In contrast to AD, these brains constituted a minority within dementia cohorts. The initial accounts portrayed a higher proportion of women being affected with an average age at death of 90 years old. The clinical phenotype of this dementia was mostly similar to AD, although psychotic episodes in a subset of individuals were also described [27, 30].

As it became steadily realized that these tauopathic changes were frequent in elderly brains without frank dementia, the PART consensus paper emerged to partly enable better recognition and consistent terminology of this histologic finding [31••, 65]. The result has been more clinicopathologic studies with larger sample sizes that incorporate data from neuropsychologic testing. Furthermore, several studies have utilized the clinical and autopsy data available in the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s (NACC) Database, information that has been curated from multiple Alzheimer Disease Research Centers across the USA [71].

In contrast to the older literature, recent studies of PART do not demonstrate an overwhelming gender predilection. As mentioned, older age does correlate with increasing Braak stage, and, to our knowledge, all of the PART studies have mean ages of death above 75 years. Subjective memory complaints (SMC) in this age group are common, and in a recent cohort of patients followed with SMC, the majority of patients with a post-mortem diagnosis of PART never progressed to dementia [72]. Furthermore, studies that have compared the rate of cognitive decline between PART and AD using multivariate analyses have consistently shown that the speed of deterioration is less than that of AD [68, 70•]. Two retrospective studies have demonstrated that patients with PART have poorer performance of semantic memory and that this deficit correlates with Braak stage [35••, 66]. The study by Josephs et al. reviewed brains with definite PART and argued that the deficit in semantic memory and relative sparing of episodic memory may be related to the anterior hippocampal atrophy that was seen in their cohort [35••]. In contrast, one other study that utilized the NACC database found that semantic memory was relatively preserved in definite PART when compared with AD and matched by clinical dementia rating (CDR) [41]. This discrepancy may be partly due to differences in study design. Josephs et al. was a study that utilized a standardized protocol and only included cases of definite PART, whereas Besser et al. utilized NACC data from different centers with differing protocols and assigned definite PART to cases without neuritic plaques. These cases may have inadvertently harbored some amyloid and therefore included possible PART cases. Interestingly, this latter study did not find significant cognitive differences between possible PART and AD suggesting clinical overlap between these two entities.

Patients with PART may have different clinical presentations from AD. Another study that utilized the NACC database found that just over half of post-mortem PART cases with dementia were clinically diagnosed as AD (51%) but at a much lower frequency than patients with AD who had dementia (85%). Instead, these patients with PART-dementia were issued other primary diagnoses such as vascular brain injury, behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), and primary progressive aphasia [69]. This diagnostic discrepancy may be a result of clinical differences between PART and AD [71].

Improved, reliable, biomarker studies that are less contingent on post-mortem neuropathology have the potential to provide prospective clinical studies of PART. Genetic studies so far have focused primarily on the frequency of the ApoE ε4 and MAPT H1/H1 haplotypes in PART and have reproducibly shown that the frequency of ApoE ε4 is less common than that seen in AD. Furthermore, the H1/H1 MAPT genotype is over-represented in PART, in contrast to AD [31••, 73].

One recent biomarker profile that has emerged in an attempt to originally capture preclinical AD is “suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology” (SNAP) [74, 75]. SNAP refers to cognitively normal or mildly impaired individuals who have normal β-amyloid biomarker levels (determined by CSF and PET ligand imaging) but abnormal neurodegeneration biomarkers (elevated levels of CSF p-tau, cerebral atrophy on MRI, and/or brain hypometabolism by 18FDG-PET). In the original study by Jack et al., 23% of over 70-year-old participants fulfilled the criteria of SNAP [75]. Several salient features of SNAP overlap with PART: (1) the frequency of SNAP increases with age [76], the ApoE ε4 haplotype is underrepresented in contrast to AD [75], and medial temporal atrophy is a feature of SNAP [74]. The clinical longitudinal data on SNAP appears mixed with some studies claiming that there are no significant cognitive differences between controls and individuals with SNAP, whereas other reports suggest steady cognitive decline in the setting of MCI in this group and worse cognitive performance than controls [7780]. Further research is needed to better understand the clinical significance of SNAP and how well the biomarker profile of SNAP corresponds to the neuropathology of PART.

Advances in PET ligand imaging of tau also holds promise to better investigate PART antemortem. A recent PET imaging study utilized PET ligands for both tau and amyloid in a series of 301 individuals with either normal cognition or MCI who had also had recent cognitive testing [81]. Forty-five percent of participants were negative for amyloid but positive for tau (A−/T+), and these had less cognitive impairment than the A+/T+ individuals, who were considered to have early AD changes, but greater cognitive deficit than the A−/T− and A+/T− individuals. Importantly, their study of the A−/T+ group, which could be considered as the pathological equivalent of PART, showed more cognitive impairments than simply amnestic syndromes. Rather, they also demonstrated deficits in language and executive functioning which led the authors to speculate that the A−/T+ group represented individuals with early AD pathologic changes. More longitudinal studies with PET imaging could provide a better understanding of the natural history of these PET findings and address the next important question as to whether PART is simply an early manifestation of AD.

Does PART Represent a Neuropathologic Phenotype of Early AD?

On the one hand, with these clinicopathologic features already outlined in this review, there are clinicopathologic differences that distinguish classical AD and PART. The clinical course and cognitive deficits overall appear less severe than in age-and stage-matched AD patients. PART seems to affect an older demographic than classical AD, often in people over 80 years of age. The genetic and pathologic differences (absence of amyloid and limited Braak stage) are also in favor of separating PART from classical AD.

However, on the other hand, separation of PART from AD is not straightforward. One strong argument against PART being a new disease entity is that the pathology considerably overlaps with the neuropathologic changes of AD albeit without significant amyloid plaque burden. The prodromal period of AD is especially long, ranging up to several decades before symptom onset and amyloid deposition usually occurs many years after the first entangled neurons appear in cross-sectional post-mortem series [15, 82, 83]. As previously stated, NFT are a common phenomenon in autopsy brains and tauopathic changes have been demonstrated in childhood and early adulthood, particularly in the nucleus coeruleus, which has diffuse cortical and spinal connections, and within the transentorhinal cortex [14, 15]. These and other subcortical structures, such as the nucleus basalis of Meynert and the dorsal raphé nucleus, are considered by many experts to be the earliest sites of AD-related tauopathic changes and consistently show neuropathologic changes in AD [84, 85]. This overlap of selectively vulnerable nuclei between PART and AD in conjunction with the knowledge that the appearance of amyloid plaques occurs much later than do tangles challenges the notion that they are distinct disease processes but rather are the same disease process examined at different time points. Furthermore, the biochemistry and ultrastructure of the NFT in PART are similar to AD [25, 73, 86]. Likewise, immunohistochemistry against different tau isoforms has identified both 3R and 4R tau-labeled NFT in PART [31••]. Interestingly, a newly described phosphorylated tau binding protein, secernin-1, that binds to NFT with both 3R and 4R tau labels NFT in PART and AD, but not NFT associated with other tauopathies such as Pick’s disease (PiD) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), where the NFT are composed of either 3R (PiD) or 4R (PSP) tau [86]. This concept of a continuum between PART and AD, such that PART represents early AD, has been proposed by Duyckaerts et al. [40••].

As mentioned, there are genetic distinctions between PART and classical AD with the H1/H1 MAPT genotype being over-represented in PART and the frequencies of ApoE4 gene carriers being less frequent than in AD [31••, 73, 87]. However, ApoE4 predisposes to beta-amyloidosis within the brain, and, therefore, this latter finding is expected given that selection of brains with PART selects against this haplotype. Moreover, while the H1/H1 MAPT genotype is over-represented in PART compared with AD in general, there is a similar frequency with limbic predominant AD [88, 89]. Some of the older studies included in the consensus PART paper may also have inadvertently included MAPT-associated FTLD-tau rather than PART.

Conclusions

At the very least, PART represents a subtype of AD that has a later onset of symptoms with a slower rate of disease progression. Further distinction of PART from AD as a distinct disease entity will rely on prospective biomarker and PET imaging studies. Also, additional work is needed in identifying a distinct biological mechanism that is separate to AD. A biochemical distinction between PART and AD associated NFT has yet to be accomplished. Outstanding questions related to the PART hypothesis include the following: (1) if tau acts in a prion-like fashion, why should NFT in PART be confined to Braak stage IV and not proteopathically spread further? [90] (2) Are there different tau strains in PART that contrast to other tauopathies? (3) What is the impact of amyloid plaques in the development of cortical NFT?

The morphologic changes in the brain with age are complex and variable between people. Aging is normally associated with the accumulation of certain proteins, such as neuromelanin in the substantia nigra [91]. In a similar manner, small amounts of tau aggregation in select nuclei in the brain could represent a usual phenomenon that steadily progresses with age. What is not so well understood is the rate and extent of this p-tau accumulation and how well clearance mechanisms are managing this. The cognitively intact 115-year-old woman referred to earlier in the review could be given the clinicopathologic diagnosis of asymptomatic, definite PART. Her rate of p-tau accumulation during her lifespan appears to be exceptionally slow for her age. Perhaps, addressing the rate of p-tau aggregation during the aging process and having an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of PART are keys to developing more personalized therapies for individuals who will develop cognitive impairment.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Jean-Paul Vonsattel for useful comments and providing the macroscopic images of Fig. 1a, b. We extend our sincere gratitude to all of the patients, families, and caregivers for their generosity in brain donation for neurodegenerative research.

Funding Information RAH is supported by grant funding from the Huntington Disease Society of America and Hereditary Disease Foundation. This review is supported by P50 AG008702 (PI Scott Small, MD) and P30AG066512 (TW).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of importance

•• Of major importance

  • 1.den Dunnen WF, Brouwer WH, Bijlard E, Kamphuis J, van Linschoten K, Eggens-Meijer E, et al. No disease in the brain of a 115-year-old woman. Neurobiol Aging. 2008;29(8):1127–32. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hickman RA, Faustin A, Wisniewski T. Alzheimer disease and its growing epidemic: risk factors, biomarkers, and the urgent need for therapeutics. Neurol Clin. 2016;34(4):941–53. 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.James BD, Bennett DA. Causes and patterns of dementia: an update in the era of redefining Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:65–84. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rabinovici GD. Late-onset Alzheimer disease. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019;25(1):14–33. 10.1212/con.0000000000000700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Neuropathology Group of the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). Pathological correlates of late-onset dementia in a multicentre, community-based population in England and Wales. Lancet. 2001;357(9251):169–75. 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03589-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Knopman DS, Parisi JE, Salviati A, Floriach-Robert M, Boeve BF, Ivnik RJ, et al. Neuropathology of cognitively normal elderly. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62(11):1087–95. 10.1093/jnen/62.11.1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Elobeid A, Libard S, Leino M, Popova SN, Alafuzoff I. Altered proteins in the aging brain. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2016;75(4): 316–25. 10.1093/jnen/nlw002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tomlinson BE, Blessed G, Roth M. Observations on the brains of non-demented old people. J Neurol Sci. 1968;7(2):331–56. 10.1016/0022-510x(68)90154-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ganz AB, Beker N, Hulsman M, Sikkes S, Netherlands Brain B, Scheltens P, et al. Neuropathology and cognitive performance in self-reported cognitively healthy centenarians. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6(1):64 10.1186/s40478-018-0558-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mizutani T, Shimada H. Neuropathological background of twenty-seven centenarian brains. J Neurol Sci. 1992;108(2):168–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Itoh Y, Yamada M, Suematsu N, Matsushita M, Otomo E. An immunohistochemical study of centenarian brains: a comparison. J Neurol Sci. 1998;157(1):73–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wood JG, Mirra SS, Pollock NJ, Binder LI. Neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer disease share antigenic determinants with the axonal microtubule-associated protein tau (tau). Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1986;83(11):4040–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Long JM, Holtzman DM. Alzheimer disease: an update on patho-biology and treatment strategies. Cell. 2019;179(2):312–39. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Braak H, Del Tredici K. The pathological process underlying Alzheimer’s disease in individuals under thirty. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;121(2):171–81. 10.1007/s00401-010-0789-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.••.Braak H, Thal DR, Ghebremedhin E, Del Tredici K. Stages of the pathologic process in Alzheimer disease: age categories from 1 to 100 years. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70(11):960–9. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e318232a379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Although nearly a decade old, this monumental paper describes the frequency and distribution of tauopathic changes and amyloid burden in over 2300 brains ranging from infancy to 100 years of age. This work demonstrated that amyloid deposition occurs at a much later time point than the onset of tauopathic changes.
  • 16.Grinberg LT, Rub U, Ferretti RE, Nitrini R, Farfel JM, Polichiso L, et al. The dorsal raphe nucleus shows phospho-tau neurofibrillary changes before the transentorhinal region in Alzheimer’s disease. A precocious onset? Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2009;35(4):406–16. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2009.00997.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elobeid A, Soininen H, Alafuzoff I. Hyperphosphorylated tau in young and middle-aged subjects. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(1): 97–104. 10.1007/s00401-011-0906-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Attems J, Thomas A, Jellinger K. Correlations between cortical and subcortical tau pathology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2012;38(6):582–90. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2011.01244.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kovacs GG, Milenkovic I, Wohrer A, Hoftberger R, Gelpi E, Haberler C, et al. Non-Alzheimer neurodegenerative pathologies and their combinations are more frequent than commonly believed in the elderly brain: a community-based autopsy series. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(3):365–84. 10.1007/s00401-013-1157-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bancher C, Leitner H, Jellinger K, Eder H, Setinek U, Fischer P, et al. On the relationship between measles virus and Alzheimer neurofibrillary tangles in subacute sclerosing panencephalitis. Neurobiol Aging. 1996;17(4):527–33. 10.1016/0197-4580(96)00069-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wisniewski K, Jervis GA, Moretz RC, Wisniewski HM. Alzheimer neurofibrillary tangles in diseases other than senile and presenile dementia. Ann Neurol. 1979;5(3):288–94. 10.1002/ana.410050311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.McKee AC, Stein TD, Kiernan PT, Alvarez VE. The neuropathology of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain Pathol (Zurich, Switzerland). 2015;25(3):350–64. 10.1111/bpa.12248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Auer IA, Schmidt ML, Lee VM, Curry B, Suzuki K, Shin RW, et al. Paired helical filament tau (PHFtau) in Niemann-Pick type C disease is similar to PHFtau in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 1995;90(6):547–51. 10.1007/bf00318566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Turk KW, Budson AE. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2019;25(1):187–207. 10.1212/con.0000000000000686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Itoh, Yamada M, Yoshida R, Suematsu N, Oka T, Matsushita M, et al. Dementia characterized by abundant neurofibrillary tangles and scarce senile plaques: a quantitative pathological study. Eur Neurol. 1996;36(2):94–7. 10.1159/000117216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jellinger KA, Bancher C. Senile dementia with tangles (tangle predominant form of senile dementia). Brain Pathol. 1998;8(2):367–76. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00160.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ulrich J Abundant neurofibrillary tangles without senile plaques in a subset of patients with senile dementia. Neurodegeneration. 1992;1:257–64. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bancher C, Jellinger KA. Neurofibrillary tangle predominant form of senile dementia of Alzheimer type: a rare subtype in very old subjects. Acta Neuropathol. 1994;88(6):565–70. 10.1007/bf00296494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yamada M Senile dementia of the neurofibrillary tangle type (tangle-only dementia): neuropathological criteria and clinical guidelines for diagnosis. Neuropathology. 2003;23(4):311–7. 10.1046/j.1440-1789.2003.00522.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ikeda K, Akiyama H, Arai T, Oda T, Kato M, Iseki E, et al. Clinical aspects of ‘senile dementia of the tangle type’–a subset of dementia in the senium separable from late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;10(1):6–11. 10.1159/000017091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.••.Crary JF, Trojanowski JQ, Schneider JA, Abisambra JF, Abner EL, Alafuzoff I, et al. Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;128(6):755–66. 10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This consensus paper introduced the concept of PART and outlined the guidelines/criteria for rendering the diagnosis.
  • 32.Jellinger K, Attems J. Neurofibrillary tangle-predominant dementia: comparison with classical Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2007;113(2):107–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Quintas-Neves M, Teylan MA, Besser L, Soares-Fernandes J, Mock CN, Kukull WA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging brain atrophy assessment in primary age-related tauopathy (PART). Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):204 10.1186/s40478-019-0842-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991;82(4):239–59. 10.1007/bf00308809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.••.Josephs KA, Murray ME, Tosakulwong N, Whitwell JL, Knopman DS, Machulda MM, et al. Tau aggregation influences cognition and hippocampal atrophy in the absence of beta-amyloid: a clinico-imaging-pathological study of primary age-related tauopathy (PART). Acta Neuropathol. 2017;133(5):705–15. 10.1007/s00401-017-1681-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A clinicopathologic study of definite PART that incorporated both pathology, neuropsychologic testing, and neuroimaging. The authors describe correlation of Braak stage with cognitive impairment and show an association between semantic memory impairment and anterior hippocampal atrophy.
  • 36.•.Jellinger KA. Different patterns of hippocampal tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and PART. Acta Neuropathol. 2018. 10.1007/s00401-018-1894-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This letter outlines an important pathologic difference in the neuropathology of PART and AD that the tauopathic burden is greater in CA2 than CA1, contrary to what is usually seen in classical AD.
  • 37.McKee AC, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, Folkerth RD, Keene CD, Litvan I, et al. The first NINDS/NIBIB consensus meeting to define neuropathological criteria for the diagnosis of chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(1):75–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hyman BT, Van Hoesen GW, Damasio AR, Barnes CL. Alzheimer’s disease: cell-specific pathology isolates the hippocampal formation. Science. 1984;225(4667):1168–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Thal DR, Rub U, Orantes M, Braak H. Phases of A beta-deposition in the human brain and its relevance for the development of AD. Neurology. 2002;58(12):1791–800. 10.1212/wnl.58.12.1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.••.Duyckaerts C, Braak H, Brion J-P, Buée L, Del Tredici K, Goedert M, et al. PART is part of Alzheimer disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129(5):749–56. 10.1007/s00401-015-1390-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This article puts forth the argument and provides evidence to suggest that PART and AD rest on a spectrum and that PART is an earlier stage of AD.
  • 41.Besser LM, Mock C, Teylan MA, Hassenstab J, Kukull WA, Crary JF. Differences in cognitive impairment in primary age-related Tauopathy versus Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2019;78(3):219–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Neltner JH, Abner EL, Jicha GA, Schmitt FA, Patel E, Poon LW, et al. Brain pathologies in extreme old age. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;37:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kovacs GG, Alafuzoff I, Al-Sarraj S, Arzberger T, Bogdanovic N, Capellari S, et al. Mixed brain pathologies in dementia: the BrainNet Europe consortium experience. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2008;26(4):343–50. 10.1159/000161560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Alafuzoff I Alzheimer’s disease-related lesions. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S173–9. 10.3233/jad-2012-129024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Robinson JL, Lee EB, Xie SX, Rennert L, Suh E, Bredenberg C, et al. Neurodegenerative disease concomitant proteinopathies are prevalent, age-related and APOE4-associated. Brain J Neurol. 2018;141(7):2181–93. 10.1093/brain/awy146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kovacs GG, Ferrer I, Grinberg LT, Alafuzoff I, Attems J, Budka H, et al. Aging-related tau astrogliopathy (ARTAG): harmonized evaluation strategy. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(1):87–102. 10.1007/s00401-015-1509-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ferrer I, Santpere G, van Leeuwen FW. Argyrophilic grain disease. Brain J Neurol. 2008;131(Pt 6):1416–32. 10.1093/brain/awm305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Saito Y, Ruberu NN, Sawabe M, Arai T, Tanaka N, Kakuta Y, et al. Staging of argyrophilic grains: an age-associated tauopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004;63(9):911–8. 10.1093/jnen/63.9.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Braak H, Braak E. Argyrophilic grain disease: frequency of occurrence in different age categories and neuropathological diagnostic criteria. J Neural Transm (Vienna, Austria : 1996). 1998;105(8–9): 801–19. 10.1007/s007020050096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nelson PT, Trojanowski JQ, Abner EL, Al-Janabi OM, Jicha GA, Schmitt FA, et al. “New old pathologies”: AD, PART, and cerebral age-related TDP-43 with sclerosis (CARTS). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2016;75(6):482–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wennberg AM, Whitwell JL, Tosakulwong N, Weigand SD, Murray ME, Machulda MM, et al. The influence of tau, amyloid, alpha-synuclein, TDP-43, and vascular pathology in clinically normal elderly individuals. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;77:26–36. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Arnold SJ, Dugger BN, Beach TG. TDP-43 deposition in prospectively followed, cognitively normal elderly individuals: correlation with argyrophilic grains but not other concomitant pathologies. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;126(1):51–7. 10.1007/s00401-013-1110-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wilson AC, Dugger BN, Dickson DW, Wang DS. TDP-43 in aging and Alzheimer’s disease—a review. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2011;4(2):147–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Arai T, Mackenzie IR, Hasegawa M, Nonoka T, Niizato K, Tsuchiya K, et al. Phosphorylated TDP-43 in Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;117(2): 125–36. 10.1007/s00401-008-0480-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.McAleese KE, Walker L, Erskine D, Thomas AJ, McKeith IG, Attems J. TDP-43 pathology in Alzheimer’s disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and ageing. Brain Pathol (Zurich, Switzerland). 2017;27(4):472–9. 10.1111/bpa.12424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Josephs KA, Murray ME, Whitwell JL, Parisi JE, Petrucelli L, Jack CR, et al. Staging TDP-43 pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127(3):441–50. 10.1007/s00401-013-1211-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Josephs KA, Murray ME, Whitwell JL, Tosakulwong N, Weigand SD, Petrucelli L, et al. Updated TDP-43 in Alzheimer’s disease staging scheme. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(4):571–85. 10.1007/s00401-016-1537-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang X, Sun B, Wang X, Lu H, Shao F, Rozemuller AJM, et al. Phosphorylated TDP-43 staging of primary age-related tauopathy. Neurosci Bull. 2019;35(2):183–92. 10.1007/s12264-018-0300-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Markesbery WR, Jicha GA, Liu H, Schmitt FA. Lewy body pathology in normal elderly subjects. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68(7):816–22. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181ac10a7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gibb WR. Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease and the Lewy body disorders. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1986;12(3):223–34. 10.1111/j.1365-2990.1986.tb00136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hamilton RL. Lewy bodies in Alzheimer’s disease: a neuropathological review of 145 cases using alpha-synuclein immunohistochemistry. Brain Pathol. 2000;10(3):378–84. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2000.tb00269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Bang W, Bennett DA. Mixed brain pathologies account for most dementia cases in community-dwelling older persons. Neurology. 2007;69(24):2197–204. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000271090.28148.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kapasi A, Schneider JA. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment, clinical Alzheimer’s disease, and dementia in older persons. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1862(5):878–86. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.12.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Attems J, Jellinger KA. The overlap between vascular disease and Alzheimer’s disease—lessons from pathology. BMC Med. 2014;12:206 10.1186/s12916-014-0206-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nelson PT, Abner EL, Schmitt FA, Kryscio RJ, Jicha GA, Santacruz K, et al. Brains with medial temporal lobe neurofibrillary tangles but no neuritic amyloid plaques are a diagnostic dilemma but may have pathogenetic aspects distinct from Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68(7):774–84. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181aacbe9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Jefferson-George KS, Wolk DA, Lee EB, McMillan CT. Cognitive decline associated with pathological burden in primary age-related tauopathy. Alzheimers Dement’. 2017;13(9):1048–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Besser LM, Crary JF, Mock C, Kukull WA. Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic persons with primary age-related tauopathy. Neurology. 2017;89(16):1707–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bell WR, An Y, Kageyama Y, English C, Rudow GL, Pletnikova O, et al. Neuropathologic, genetic, and longitudinal cognitive profiles in primary age-related tauopathy (PART) and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(1):8–16. 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Teylan M, Besser LM, Crary JF, Mock C, Gauthreaux K, Thomas NM, et al. Clinical diagnoses among individuals with primary age-related tauopathy versus Alzheimer’s neuropathology. Lab Investig. 2019;99(7):1049–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.•.Teylan M, Mock C, Gauthreaux K, Chen YC, Chan KCG, Hassenstab J, et al. Cognitive trajectory in mild cognitive impairment due to primary age-related tauopathy. Brain J Neurol. 2020;143(2):611–21. 10.1093/brain/awz403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This paper compares individuals with PART and matched individuals with AD and shows a slower cognitive decline in PART than in AD.
  • 71.Mock C, Teylan M, Beecham G, Besser L, Cairns NJ, Crary JF, et al. The utility of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Database for the rapid assessment of evolving neuropathologic conditions. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2020;34:105–11. 10.1097/wad.0000000000000380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kryscio R, Abner E, Jicha G, Nelson P, Smith C, Van Eldik L, et al. Self-reported memory complaints: a comparison of demented and unimpaired outcomes. J Prev Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016;3(1):13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Santa-Maria I, Haggiagi A, Liu X, Wasserscheid J, Nelson PT, Dewar K, et al. The MAPT H1 haplotype is associated with tangle-predominant dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124(5): 693–704. 10.1007/s00401-012-1017-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Chetelat G, Dickson D, Fagan AM, Frisoni GB, et al. Suspected non-Alzheimer disease pathophysiology–concept and controversy. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(2):117–24. 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Jack CR Jr, Knopman DS, Weigand SD, Wiste HJ, Vemuri P, Lowe V, et al. An operational approach to National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association criteria for preclinical Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(6):765–75. 10.1002/ana.22628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Jack CR Jr, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Rocca WA, Knopman DS, Mielke MM, et al. Age-specific population frequencies of cerebral beta-amyloidosis and neurodegeneration among people with normal cognitive function aged 50–89 years: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(10):997–1005. 10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70194-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Burnham SC, Bourgeat P, Dore V, Savage G, Brown B, Laws S, et al. Clinical and cognitive trajectories in cognitively healthy elderly individuals with suspected non-Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology (SNAP) or Alzheimer’s disease pathology: a longitudinal study. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(10):1044–53. 10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Soldan A, Pettigrew C, Fagan AM, Schindler SE, Moghekar A, Fowler C, et al. ATN profiles among cognitively normal individuals and longitudinal cognitive outcomes. Neurology. 2019;92(14): e1567–e79. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000007248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Caroli A, Prestia A, Galluzzi S, Ferrari C, van der Flier WM, Ossenkoppele R, et al. Mild cognitive impairment with suspected nonamyloid pathology (SNAP): prediction of progression. Neurology. 2015;84(5):508–15. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000001209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Wisse LEM, Butala N, Das SR, Davatzikos C, Dickerson BC, Vaishnavi SN, et al. Suspected non-AD pathology in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(12):3152–62. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.08.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Weigand AJ, Bangen KJ, Thomas KR, Delano-Wood L, Gilbert PE, Brickman AM, et al. Is tau in the absence of amyloid on the Alzheimer’s continuum?: A study of discordant PET positivity. Brain Commun. 2020;2(1):fcz046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Price JL, Morris JC. Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 1999;45(3): 358–68. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dubois B, Hampel H, Feldman HH, Scheltens P, Aisen P, Andrieu S, et al. Preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(3):292–323. 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ehrenberg AJ, Nguy AK, Theofilas P, Dunlop S, Suemoto CK, Di Lorenzo Alho AT, et al. Quantifying the accretion of hyperphosphorylated tau in the locus coeruleus and dorsal raphe nucleus: the pathological building blocks of early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2017;43(5):393–408. 10.1111/nan.12387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Andres-Benito P, Fernandez-Duenas V, Carmona M, Escobar LA, Torrejon-Escribano B, Aso E, et al. Locus coeruleus at asymptomatic early and middle Braak stages of neurofibrillary tangle pathology. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2017;43(5):373–92. 10.1111/nan.12386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Pires G, McElligott S, Drusinsky S, Halliday G, Potier MC, Wisniewski T, et al. Secernin-1 is a novel phosphorylated tau binding protein that accumulates in Alzheimer’s disease and not in other tauopathies. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7(1):195 10.1186/s40478-019-0848-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Bancher C, Egensperger R, Kösel S, Jellinger K, Graeber MB. Low prevalence of apolipoprotein E ε4 allele in the neurofibrillary tangle predominant form of senile dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 1997;94(5):403–9. 10.1007/s004010050726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Janocko NJ, Brodersen KA, Soto-Ortolaza AI, Ross OA, Liesinger AM, Duara R, et al. Neuropathologically defined subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease differ significantly from neurofibrillary tangle-predominant dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124(5): 681–92. 10.1007/s00401-012-1044-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Murray ME, Graff-Radford NR, Ross OA, Petersen RC, Duara R, Dickson DW. Neuropathologically defined subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease with distinct clinical characteristics: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(9):785–96. 10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70156-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gibbons GS, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ. Mechanisms of cell-to-cell transmission of pathological tau: a review. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(1):101–8. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Esiri MM. Ageing and the brain. J Pathol. 2007;211(2):181–7. 10.1002/path.2089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES