TABLE 3.
Study | Country | Reference | Time horizon | Evaluation base | Sample size | Cost ratio | Cost saving ($) | Sensitivity analysis | Cost type and source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G-CSF biosimilars vs. G-CSF | |||||||||
McBride et al. a (McBride et al., 2020) | United States | Filgrastim | 1 cycle | Hypothetical cohort | 20,000 | 68.10% | 1,221.0/patient/cycle | — | D: official database; A: official database; C: official database |
Bongiovanni et al. a . (Bongiovanni et al., 2017) | Italy | Filgrastim | 4 cycles | Retrospective cohort | 45 | 21.0% | 660.7/patient/cycle | — | D: official database |
McBride et al. a (McBride et al., 2017) | United States | Filgrastim | 1 cycle | Hypothetical cohort | 20,000 | 76.9% | 327.0–916.0/patient/cycle | Days of in one cycle (5–14 days b ) | D: official database |
Sun et al. a (Sun et al., 2015) | 5 EU countries | Filgrastim | 1 cycle | Hypothetical cohort | 10,000 | 74.5% | 610.2/patient/cycle | Uptake rate of biosimilars (10%–50% c ) | D: official database |
Ianotto et al. d (Ianotto et al., 2014) | France | Filgrastim | — | Retrospective cohort | 115 | 21.3%–24.5% | 568.0–647.7/patient/cycle | — | D: official database |
Aapro et al. a (Aapro et al., 2012a; Aapro et al., 2012b) | 5 EU countries | Filgrastim | 1 cycle | Individual level | — | 74.5% | 610.5/patient/cycle | — | D: official database |
EPO biosimilars vs. EPO | |||||||||
Valentina et al. a (Valentina et al., 2016) | Italy | Epoetin α | 4 weeks | Individual level | 69 | 51.0% | 104.9/patient/week | — | D: official database |
Aapro et al. a (Aapro et al., 2012a; Aapro et al., 2012b) | 5 EU countries | Epoetin α | 6 cycles | Individual level | — | 64.8%–86.2% | 220.0–563.1/patient/cycle | — | D: official database |
MAB biosimilars vs. MAB | |||||||||
Giuliani et al. d (Giuliani and Bonetti, 2019) | Italy | Rituximab | 1 month | Randomized control trial | 2,362 | 60.5% | 322.4/patient/month | — | D: official database |
Trastuzumab | 59.4% | 3,862.4–7,423.5/patient/month | |||||||
Mehta et al. a (Mehta and Hay, 2014) | United States | Bevacizumab | Lifetime | Hypothetical cohort | 1,000 | 81.0%–86.0% | 17,517.0–38,923.0/patient | — | D: official database; C: literature; I: literatures |
Note: perspective: payer.
Inputting parameters based on data from literature.
Inputting parameters based on assumption without foundation. D: drug cost; A: administration cost; C: condition-related cost; I: indirect cost.
Unspecified. Indication: G-CSF biosimilars: febrile neutropenia; EPO biosimilars: anemia; MAB biosimilars: rituximab for follicular lymphoma, trastuzumab for breast cancer, and bevacizumab for advanced ovarian cancer. — means no reporting.