Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 9;32(4):464–471. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1196

Table 3.

Residents’ responses to questions on the applicability of FoCUS and their proficiency.

Response (Likert scale) Applicability of Indication for Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Knowledge & Skills


JVP height IVC diameter LV function RV strain Pericardial effusion FoCUS






Specialty IM CCM IM CCM IM CCM IM CCM IM CCM IM CCM
Very Poor 13 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 55 0
Poor 9 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 17 1
Fair 20 0 13 0 10 0 9 0 9 0 19 4
Good 22 1 23 3 24 1 26 3 21 1 7 4
Very Good 36 8 58 7 63 9 62 7 68 9 2 1
Total 100 10 100 10 100 10 100 10 100 10 100 10

This table presents residents’ responses to questions on the applicability of five indications for FoCUS and their self-reported proficiency in FoCUS. Applicability and proficiency are rated on a 5 point Likert Scale (1, Very Poor; 2, Poor; 3, Fair; 4, Good and 5, Very Good). IVC, inferior vena cava; JVP, jugular venous pulsation; LV, left ventricular; RV, right ventricular. Data are stratified by specialty and presented as frequencies.