Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 29;9(1):e001045. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001045

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Linear regressions performed separately on patient groups monitored with different device types (FGM or rtCGM) and different sampling periods (900 s or 300 s) compared with Vigersky and McMahon.17 (A) FGM group: β1=−11.77±2.73, p<0.001; β0=141.19±20.6, p<0.001; r2=0.49. (B) rtCGM group: β1=−10.74±2.4, p<0.001; β0=140.77±17.35, p<0.001; r2=0.55. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; FGM, flash CGM; HbA1c, hemoglobin A1c; rtCGM, real-time CGM; TIR, time in range.