Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;8:592008. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.592008

Table 1.

NO donors and delivery vehicles.

Authors (PMID) NO donor Delivery vehicle NO concentration NO release half-life or duration In vitro/ in vivo Model system Aim Outcome
Zhu et al. (2007) Sodium nitrite Gel 14.6 mM sodium nitrite mixed in equal amounts with maleic acid 14.6 mM + ascorbic acid 14.6 mM cream Concentration of NO maintained at 10 mM for >1 h after application. In vivo Rats Topical Gel-based NO donor effect on wound healing Increased anti-inflammatory cell infiltration
Zhu et al. (2008) Sodium nitrite Gel 14.6 mM sodium nitrite mixed in equal amounts with low pH acid gel Concentration of NO maintained at 10 mM for >1 h after application. In vivo Mice Topical NO gel on wound healing Increased re-epithelization by 50%, hair follicle regeneration, angiogenesis, procollagen—expressing fibroblasts, promotion and infiltration of inflammatory cells in wound beds
Phillips et al. (2004) Sodium nitrite Cream 6% wt/wt sodium nitrite mixed with 9.9% wt/wt citric acid cream Not reported In vivo Human clinical trial Topical nitrite cream effect on ulcer reduction Reduction in surface area ulcers in Mycobacterium ulcerans wounds
Ormerod et al. (2011) Sodium nitrite Cream 3% (w/v) sodium nitrite mixed in equal amounts with 4.5% (w/v) citric acid in aqueous cream Not reported In vivo Human clinical trial Topical NO cream effect on MRSA wound clearance Acidified topical nitrites able to clear 60% MRSA wounds
Martinez et al. (2009) Topical NO Chitosan derived hydrogel/
glass composite
100 nM peak, 50 nM steady state Steady state reached after 6 h and maintained for 9 h, ongoing release occurred for ~24 h In vivo Mice NO nanoparticle activity against MRSA wounds Decreased eschar size, decreased bacterial burden, prevention of collagen degradation
Mihu et al. (2010) Topical NO Chitosan derived hydrogel/
glass composite
2.5 mg/ml of NO-np: initial peak 37.5 nM, steady state 20 nM
5 mg/ml of NO-np: initial peak 75 nM, steady state 50 nM
10 mg/ml of NO-np: initial peak 150 nM, steady state 100 nM
20 mg/ml of NO-np: initial peak 300 nM, steady state 200 nM
Not measured, reported in prior studies as ongoing release for ~24 h (Friedman et al., 2008; Martinez et al., 2009) In vivo Mice NO-np activity on murine Acinetobacter baumannii wound model Reduced suppurative infection, decreased microbial burden, reduced collagen degradation
Mancini et al. (2000) SNP and 2,2' (hydroxynitrosohydrazino) bis-ethanamine (NOC-18) SNP: 10μM, 50μM, 100μM
NOC-18: 10μM, 50μM, 100μM
Not reported In vitro Rat enriched osteoblast cultures NO effect on osteoblast activity Slow, moderate NO release with NOC-18 stimulated osteoblast replication and alkaline phosphatase activity. Rapid high-concentration NO release with SNP inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis
Abnosi and Pari (2019) SNP SNP 100 μM and 1,000 μM Not reported In vivo Rats Demonstrate possible effect of SNP as an NO-releasing agent on MSC differentiation to osteoblasts SNP increased matrix deposition, promoted MSC differentiation to osteoblasts and may be useful in promotion of bone repair
Chen et al. (2019) Dinitrosyl iron complexes (DNIC-1 and DNIC-2) Direct application of DNICs into wounds Angiogenesis: 7.8 μM DNIC-1, DNIC-2
Diabetic hindlimb ischemia: 0.18 mg/kg DNIC-
DNIC-1 t1/2 = 27.4 ± 0.5 h at 25°C and 16.8 ± 1.8 h at 37°CDNIC-2 t1/2 = 1.7 ± 0.1 h at 25°C and 0.8 ± 0.1 h at 37°C In vivo Mice Effect of DNICs on wound healing DNIC-1 displays best pro-angiogenesis and restores impaired angiogenesis in ischemic hind limbs, increasing wound repair in diabetic mice
Shekhter et al. (2015) Dinitrosyl iron complexes with glutathione (DNIC- GS) Collagen matrix/ DNIC-GS composite spongy sheets 4.0 μM DNIC-GS Complete NO release from matrix in 1 h after submersion in distilled water In vivo Rats DNIC on skin wound healing Enhanced growth, maturation, and fibrous transformation of granulation tissue
Kim et al. (2015) GSNO CS/NO-releasing film 0.625 mM GSNO (2.5, 10 and 20 wt%) in 20 g of chitosan solution Ongoing NO release at 48 h for all concentrations In vitro Rats CS/NO releasing films on wound healing Increased wound healing and epithelialization compared to chitosan only films
Choi et al. (2020) GSNO CS/NO-releasing film 0.26 μM NO/mg film Continued NO release up to day 3 In vitro Mice CS/NO releasing films on diabetic wound healing Enhanced antibacterial activity against MRSA; Greater anti-biofilm activity; Faster biofilm dispersal, wound size reduction, epithelialization rates and collagen deposition than untreated and chitosan only groups
Baldik et al. (2002) SNO-BSA Demineralized bone matrix 0.3 mM/L nitrosobovine serum albumin Not reported In vivo Rats Femoral bone healing defect recovery Increased union, mineral density, cortex modeling
Storm et al. (2014) NONO xerogels Xerogel- coated glass slides Total NO released, μM cm−2: 3.3 ± 0.4, 2.5 ± 0.6, 2.6 ± 0.3, 1.9 ± 0.3, 2.3 ± 0.3 (0, 6, 12, 18, 24 coating layers, respectively) Apparent t1/2, h: 11.4 ± 0.7, 13.6 ± 1.4, 17.8 ± 4.3, 13.2 ± 0.6, 16.3 ± 2.4 (0, 6, 12, 18, 24 coating layers, respectively) In vitro Mice fibroblasts NO-releasing superhydrophobic xerogel effect on Pseudomonas Reduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa compared to control
Diwan et al. (2000) CBC-NO Surgically implanted NO-releasing chitosan matrix 200 mg CBC-NO (releases 250 nM NO per 5 mg of CBC-NO) Duration of NO release = 185 min In vivo Rats NO impact in femoral fracture repair Day 17 post-fracture: 20% increase in cross-sectional area fracture callus compared to control; 30%
compared to NOS inhibition
Differ et al. (2019) Deta NONOate, SNAP, L-Arginine Deta NONOate (10–1,000 μM)
SNAP (1–100 μM)
Arginine (0.1–7.5 mM)
Deta NONOate t1/2 = 20 h
SNAP t1/2 = 6 h
In vitro C2C12BRELuc reporter cell line BMP2- induced signaling and osteogenic abilities Enhanced BMP2 signaling and osteogenic induction with all NO donors studied
Charville et al. (2008) NO diazeniumdiolate-modified xerogels; PVC coated Xerogel- coated glass slides 10, 20, 30 and 40% AHAP3 xerogels (average NO flux, pM cm−2 s−1: 11, 18, 23, 30, respectively) Not reported In vitro Bacterial adhesion to fibrinogen coated NO releasing surfaces Reduced bacterial adhesion for Staphylococcus aureus, Escheria coli and, Staphylococcus epidermidis
Hetrick and Schoenfisch (2007) NO xerogels Xerogel- coated glass slides 10, 20, 30, and 40% AHAP3 xerogels Low-level NO release up to 16 h at 25°C In vitro Pseudomonas adhesion NO xerogels showed inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and killing of adhered bacterial cells
Privett et al. (2010) Surface generated NO using model xerogel surfaces (AHAP3 and BTMOS) Xerogel- coated glass slides 10, 20, 30, and 40% AHAP3 xerogels (NO release over 15 h at 37°C, μM cm−2: 0.049 ± 0.004, 0.324 ± 0.055, 0.852 ± 0.323, 2.077 ± 0.656, respectively) t1/2, h (37°C): 2.450 ± 0.272, 2.853 ± 0.231, 2.358 ± 0.274, 3.9364 ±0.381, respectively In vitro Surface generated NO against Candida albicans using modified xerogel surfaces Reduction in Candida growth
Holt et al. (2011) Diazeniumdiolate NO donor-functionalized xerogels Surgically implanted 0.28 ± 0.11 μM cm−2 total NO released,
20 ± 7 pM cm−2 s−1 max NO flux
t1/2 = 4 h
No NO release detected after 7 days
In vivo Rats Quantify incidence of bacterial infection in implanted xerogel coated titanium pins Reduced infection incidence, decreased erythema and edema surrounding surgical wounds
Riccio et al. (2009) Sol-gel derived silica nanoparticles: NO-releasing RSNO-modified xerogels Incubated with fibroblasts 20, 40, 60, and 80% MPTMS xerogels (Total NO released, μM mg−1: 0.47 ± 0.13, 0.68 ± 0.07, 0.81 ± 0.03, 1.31 ± 0.07 for, respectively) NO flux > 0.4 pM cm−2 s−1 for up to 3 days with 20% MPTMS gel and up to 1–2 weeks with 40–80% MPTMS gel In vitro Mouse fibroblasts Examine ability of xerogel coatings to resist bacterial and platelet adhesion Reduction in Pseudomonas aeruginoasa and activated platelet adhesion in RSNO-modified xerogels, with maintenance of fibroblast viability
Hetrick et al. (2008) NO- releasing silica nanoparticles Incubation ~3.8 μM·mg−1 total NO released, ~21,700 ppb·mg−1 max NO flux t1/2 = 18 min In vitro Mouse fibroblasts Examine NO-releasing silica nanoparticles bactericidal effectiveness NO delivered from silica nanoparticles more effective at killing P. aeruginosa
Lu et al. (2013) PAMAM dendrimers Incubation ~1 μM/mg total NO release t1/2 ~ 1 h In vitro Mouse fibroblasts Evaluation of PAMAM bactericidal properties Size and exterior functionality crucial in dendrimer-bacteria association, NO delivery efficiency, bacteria membrane disruption, migration of biofilm and mammalian toxicity
Johnson et al. (2010) Nitrosthiol G4-SNAP scaffold
2 μM SNAP with 0.5–10 mM GSH, 1.28 μM NO/mg
max NO release
Not reported In vitro Rat Heart (isolated, perfused) Evaluation of G4-SNAP for reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury) Dendrimer scaffold did not inhibit NO therapeutic activity
Lin et al. (2018) In situ self-assembling NO-releasing micelle deposits Subcutaneously implantation 30 μM NONOate t1/2 = 1298.3 ± 205.8 s
w/ Hb at 37°C
In vivo Ovariectomized rats with osteoporosis Examine ability of self-assembling micelles to release NO Longer NO-released in OVX-induced osteoporosis rats reversing effects
Duong et al. (2014) CCS Polymers Incubation 60 μM total NO release Continuous NO release for 70 h In vitro Evaluate CCS controlled NO release Decreased cell attachment and biofilm production of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with CCS polymers
Pant et al. (2019) SNAP 3D bone scaffolds 10 wt% SNAP, initial NO release rate 0.5 ± 0.06 ×10−10 mol/min/mg, NO release rate 0.23 ± 0.02 ×10−10 mol/min/mg after 24 h Theoretical t1/2 extrapolated to 8.6 days In vivo Mice fibroblasts Examination of 3D bone scaffold releasing SNAP anti-bacterial properties Reduction in Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence
Friedman et al. (2011) Sol-gel derived silica nanoparticles: NO-np generating GSNO Incubation ~300 μM GSNO release Duration of NO release >24 h In vitro Human clinical isolates Examine NO-np GSNO generating abilities NO-np are able to generate and maintain GSNO formation over prolonged time period, where lower NO concentrations are more effective antimicrobial agents