Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;12(1):223–233. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa101

TABLE 3.

Study design, duration, and endurance-type performance measurement outcome in healthy subjects in systematic reviews split by training status1

First author (ref) Study design Duration, d Performance measure Performance outcome2
Inline graphicO2max ≥53 mL · kg−1 · min−1
 Burke et al. (16) Parallel NRCT 21 TT, race walk (10 km)
 Burke et al. (37) Parallel NRCT 25 TT, race walk (10 km)
 McSwiney et al. (18) Parallel NRCT 84 TT, cycle ergometer (100 km)
 Phinney et al. (12) Longitudinal 28 TTE, cycle ergometer (60–65% Inline graphicO2max)
 Prins et al. (28) Crossover RCT 42 TT, treadmill (5 km)
TTE, cycle ergometer (graded intensity)
 Shaw et al. (29) Crossover RCT 31 TTE, treadmill (70% Inline graphicO2max)
Inline graphicO2max <53 mL · kg−1 · min−1
 Cipryan et al. (15) Parallel BRCT 28 TTE, treadmill (100% Inline graphicO2max)
 Dostal et al. (33) Parallel NRCT 84 TTE, treadmill (graded test)
TTE, shuttle run (30–15 intermittent fitness test)
 Heatherly et al. (27) Longitudinal 21 TT, treadmill (5 km)
 Sjodin et al. (30) Crossover RCT 28 TTE, cycle ergometer (graded intensity)
 Zinn et al. (31) Longitudinal 70 TTE, cycle ergometer (graded intensity)

1BRCT, block randomized controlled trial; CON, mixed macronutrient control diet; KD, ketogenic diet; NRCT, nonrandomized controlled trial; RCT, randomized controlled trial; ref, reference; TT, time trial; TTE, time-to-exhaustion; Inline graphicO2max, maximal oxygen uptake.

2

Physical performance significantly lower (↓), higher (↑), or not different (↔) following a KD compared with CON.