Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;14:171–180. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S290711

Table 6.

Overall Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Three Different Commercial Available SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM Rapid Test Against RT-PCR, 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Manufacturer/Test Kit Rate of Correct Positive Test Results (Percent Agreement with rt PCR) Rate of Correct Negative Test Results (Percent Agreement with rtPCR) Sensitivity (%), 95% CI Specificity (%), 95% CI Positive Predictive Value (%), 95% CI Negative Predictive Value (%), 95% CI Kappa Value*, 95% CI
Total =52/85
IgG&IgM IgG IgM
A 31 12 9 111/115 61.18%(49.96–71.37%) 97%(90.81–98.88%) 92.9(81.9–97.7%) 77.08%(69.19–83.49%) 0.60(0.48–0.83),
B Total =63/85 109/115 74.12% (63.28–82.74%) 94.78%(88.52–97.86%) 91.30%(81.39–96.42%) 83.21%(75.45–88.95%) 0.71 (0.65–0.93)
29 22 12
C Total= 71/85 109/115 83.53% (73.57– 90.38%) 94.78%(88.52–97.86%) 92.21%(83.21–96.79%) 88.62%(81.32–93.41%) 0.80(0.76–1.04)
16 33 22

Notes: A= EGENES, B= CTk onsite, C= ACON, *un-weighted kappa value.