Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 1;9:19. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00510-5

Table 6.

Bivariate correlations between TFS/I, LOT-R and SWLS

N = 453 M (SD) SKE (SE) KUR (SE) PA CU FU LOT-R SWLS
TFS
PA 3.92 (1.09) .884 (.115) .161 (.229) 1
CU 5.17 (1.09) − .303 (.115) − .182 (.229) − .135** 1
[.04, − .22]
FU 4.50 (1.28) .039 (.115) − .557 (.229) .238** .073 1
[.32, .15] [.16, − .02]
LOT-R
LOT-R 20.96 (4.38) .619 (.115) .432 (.229) − .094* .282** − .003 1
[− .01, − .18] [.36, .19] [.09, − .09]
SWLS
SWLS 4.65 (1.31) − .350 (.115) − .635 (.229) − .175** .345** − .071 .345** 1
[− .08, − .26] [.42, .26] [.02, − .16] [.42, .26]

TFS temporal focus scale, PA past focus, CU current focus, FU future focus, LOT-R life orientation test, SWLS satisfaction with life scale

**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). For BDI-II and LOT-R Spearman’s correlation has been used. Values in square brackets indicate the 95% confidence interval for each correlation