Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 29;218(3):e20201795. doi: 10.1084/jem.20201795

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Gene coexpression network analysis reveals transcriptional modules in peripheral WBCs that predict SCI severity. (A) Analysis of module eigengene (PC1) scores by patient cohort reveals 16 SCI-specific gene coexpression modules following unsupervised gene coexpression network analysis (one-way ANOVA, adjusted P value <0.05, Tukey’s P value < 0.05 for each comparison). Some modules (e.g., M4) display a gradual change in gene expression, whereas in others (e.g., M1, M5), HCs and TCs are very similar to each other but different from SCIs. n = 10 for HCs and TCs and 38 for SCIs. (B and C) The M13 module has the highest correlation to SCI severity (Spearman ρ = 0.82). In B is the heatmap of the top-seeded genes for this module (top), and the eigengene score for each one of the patients and controls (bottom). The graph in C shows the expression levels of the top 15 genes of the M13 module across all 58 samples. As expected from the analysis, these top genes of the module exhibit a strong coexpression pattern. (D) Receiver operating characteristic plots for the AIS A against the remaining SCIs (left) and the AIS D against the remaining SCIs (right). These plots show the strong predictive ability of our model for SCI patients with AIS A and D. The area under the curve (AUC) is 0.865 for A and 0.938 for D. n = 12 A vs. 21 SCIs and 11 D vs. 22 SCIs (color scheme in x-axis labels in B is as follows: blue = HC, green = TC, brown = AIS D, purple = AIS C, salmon = AIS B, and red = AIS A).