Table 1a.
Individual indices | Description | Probable keratoconus | Clinical keratoconus |
---|---|---|---|
Central keratometry (K central) | Average corneal power for ring diameters of 2, 3, and 4 mm | 47.2–48.7 | >48.7 [18] |
Inferior–superior value (I–S) | Power difference between 5 points of the superior and inferior hemisphere at 3 mm from the corneal apex with spatial intervals of 30°. A positive value indicates a higher inferior curvature and a negative value indicates a higher superior curvature | 1.4–1.8 | >1.8 [19] |
Skew of steepest radial axis (SRAX) | Angle between superior semi-meridian and inferior semi-meridians, determined by averaging powers of rings from 5 to 16 mm | >21° [20] | |
Apex curvature (AK) | Instantaneous curvature in the corneal apex | 48–50 D | >50 D [20] |
Asphericity coefficient (Q) | Index describing corneal curvature change from central region to the peripheral region. A normal cornea has a average Q value of −0.2 ± 0.12 (77) and represents that the cornea is more curved in the center. The value depends on the diameter of the study, which is usually set at 4–5 mm |
1. −0.84 for anterior surface and −1.10 for the posterior surface at 8 mm [14] 2. −0.65 to −1.18 for the anterior surface and −1.17 to −0.6 for the posterior surface [15] |
|
Corneal irregularity measurement (CIM) | Degree of corneal surface irregularity by quantifying standard deviation between corneal surface and best-fit reference | 0.69–1 μm | 1.10–5.00 μm [21] |
Calossi–Foggi Apex curvature gradient (ACG) | Average difference per length unit of the corneal power relative to the apical power | 1.5–2.0 D | >2.0 D [21] |
Calossi–Foggi Top–Bottom Index | Vertical asymmetric index indicating difference in average power between superior and inferior area. A positive value indicates an inferior area that is more curved | 1.5–2.0 D | >2.0 D [21] |