Table 3.
Survey Question | Strongly Agree, n (%) | Agree, n (%) | Disagree, n (%) | Strongly Disagree, n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
It was difficult to integrate the intensity-based program into my clinical practice. | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 5 (100) | 0 (0) |
It was challenging to recruit patients to participate in the study. | 1 (20) | 3 (60) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) |
Once enrolled, patients responded favorably to the intensity-based approach.∗ | 0 (0) | 5 (100) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) |
I had sufficient resources, including time, to deliver the intensity-based program. | 0 (0) | 2 (40) | 2 (40) | 1 (20) |
The REDCap survey tool was easy to use. | 2 (40) | 2 (40) | 1 (20) | 0 (0) |
I consistently delivered the intensity dosage and progression generated by the REDCap tool. | 1 (20) | 4 (80) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
I consistently administered the specified outcome measures to study participants at admission and discharge. | 3 (60) | 2 (40) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Upon reflection, the intensity-based approach was effective in my setting. | 3 (60) | 2 (40) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Involvement in the study positively impacted the way I practice now. | 3 (60) | 2 (40) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
NOTE. Four of the 6 outcome measures collected demonstrated between-group effect sizes greater than 0.60. The 2MWT and Tinetti demonstrated significant group × time interactions (P<.05).
One participant selected “Agree” and “Disagree” and stated that it depended on the patient.