Table 2. Multiple regression analysis of the different mating orientation scales.

	SOI–R Behavior			SOI–R Attitude			SOI–R Desire			LTMO
	${\mathit{R}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{d}\mathit{j}}^2$	F	p	${\mathit{R}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{d}\mathit{j}}^2$	F	p	${\mathit{R}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{d}\mathit{j}}^2$	F	p	${\mathit{R}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{d}\mathit{j}}^2$	F	p
	0.13	34.78	< .001	0.06	14.58	< .001	0.08	20.05	< .001	0.01	3.37	.009
	b [95% CI]	SE	p	b [95% CI]	SE	p	b [95% CI]	SE	p	b [95% CI]	SE	p
Intercept	–1.62 [–2.23, –1.01]	0.31	< .001	–0.98 [-1.62, -0.34]	0.32	.003	–1.51 [–2.14, –0.88]	0.32	< .001	–0.37 [–1.03, 0.28]	0.33	.262
Men	–0.16 [–0.28, –0.03]	0.06	.015	–0.10 [–0.23, 0.03]	0.07	.132	0.31 [0.18, 0.45]	0.07	< .001	0.18 [0.05, 0.32]	0.07	.008
Hetero	–0.13 [–0.26, 0.01]	0.07	.062	–0.19 [-0.33, -0.05]	0.07	.008	–0.10 [–0.24, 0.04]	0.07	.144	0.14 [0.00, 0.28]	0.07	.054
Age	0.08 [0.05, 0.11]	0.02	< .001	0.05 [0.02, 0.08]	0.02	.001	0.07 [0.04, 0.10]	0.02	< .001	0.01 [–0.02, 0.04]	0.02	.490
Apps used	0.73 [0.57, 0.88]	0.08	< .001	0.44 [0.28, 0.60]	0.08	< .001	0.39 [0.23, 0.55]	0.08	< .001	–0.10 [–0.26, 0.07]	0.09	.251

Notes: SOI-R = Sociosexual Orientation Inventory-Revised; LTMO = Long Term Mating Orientation Scale; CI = confidence interval; Men = dummy variable where women = 0 and men = 1; Heterosexual = dummy variable where sexual minority = 0 and heterosexual = 1; Apps used = dummy variable indicating whether any dating app was used in the three months prior to participating in the study. Bold values correspond to statistically significant coefficients (p <. 05).