Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 21;17(1):e1009315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009315

Table 3. Comparison of results of RAFFI and KING in the simulated data.

KING
MZ PO FS 2nd 3rd 4th UN
RAFFI MZ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PO 0 5993 3 28 0 0 0
FS 0 7 4548 0 0 0 0
2nd 0 0 5 25927 21 0 12
3rd 0 0 0 1971 56619 116 1056
4th 0 0 0 0 15833 71966 36765
UN 0 0 0 0 0 10342