. 2021 Jan 17;146:102220. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2020.102220

Table 2.

The selection of subsidy policy considering the stability and profitability performances.

Group	Region	Sub-region	System PS	System ES	Profitability	Decision
1	$R_{5} + R_{61} + R_{62}$	$R_{5}$	Unstable	Unstable	$π_{g}^{PS} < π_{g}^{ES}$	Slow down $g^{ES}$
		$R_{61}$	Unstable	Unstable	$π_{g}^{PS} < π_{g}^{ES}$	Slow down $g^{ES}$
		$R_{62}$	Unstable	Unstable	$π_{g}^{PS} > π_{g}^{ES}$	Slow down $g^{PS}$
	$R_{8}$	$R_{8}$	Unstable	Unstable	$π_{g}^{PS} < π_{g}^{ES}$	Slow down $g^{ES}$
2	$R_{3} + R_{4}$	$R_{3}$	Unstable	Stable	$π_{g}^{PS} < π_{g}^{ES}$	innovation effort subsidy
	$R_{3} + R_{4}$	$R_{4}$	Unstable	Stable	$π_{g}^{PS} > π_{g}^{ES}$	innovation effort subsidy
	$R_{11} + R_{12}$	$R_{12}$	Unstable	Stable	$π_{g}^{PS} < π_{g}^{ES}$	innovation effort subsidy
	$R_{11} + R_{12}$	$R_{11}$	Unstable	Stable	N/A	innovation effort subsidy
3	$R_{71} + R_{72}$	$R_{72}$	Stable	Unstable	$π_{g}^{PS} > π_{g}^{ES}$	per-unit production subsidy
3	$R_{71} + R_{72}$	$R_{71}$	Stable	Unstable	$π_{g}^{PS} < π_{g}^{ES}$	per-unit production subsidy
4	$R_{21} + R_{22}$	$R_{21}$	Stable	Stable	$π_{g}^{PS} > π_{g}^{ES}$	per-unit production subsidy
4	$R_{21} + R_{22}$	$R_{22}$	Stable	Stable	$π_{g}^{PS} < π_{g}^{ES}$	innovation effort subsidy