Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Mater. 2020 Dec 16;33(5):e2004776. doi: 10.1002/adma.202004776

Table 4.

3D bioprinting strategies

Type Inkjet-based Extrusion-based Light-assisted Light-assisted Light-assisted
Subtype Thermal, piezoelectric, electrostatic Pneumatic, mechanical (piston-driven, screw-driven) Scanning-based (LAB, TPP) Projection-based (DLP) Projection-based (volumetric)
Fabrication process Serial: point-by-point Serial: line-by-line Serial: point-by-point Parallel: layer-by-layer Parallel: rotational
Advantages Fast printing speed, high resolution, high throughput, low cost Broad biomaterial selection, scale-up potential, high cell densities, low cost Very high resolution, compatible with biomaterials in different phases High resolution, very high speed, good interface integrity, broad biomaterial selection, scale-up potential Concurrent printing of real 3D structures, scalable to large constructs
Limitations Poor interface integrity, low cell densities, limited to low viscosity biomaterials Limited interface integrity, resolution limited by nozzle diameter High cost, limited biomaterial selection, limited scalability, low throughput Requires photosensitive biomaterials Limited resolution, cell density may be limited due to light scattering
Typical resolution 10 μm 100 μm (with cell), 5 μm (acellular) 1 μm 2 μm mm scale
Bioink viscosity Low: 3.5 to 12 mPa×s Wide range: 30 to 6×107 mPa×s Medium: 1 to 300 mPa×s - High viscosity fluids: 90,000 mPa×s, or solids
Cell density Low :106 cells/ml High High: 108 cells/ml High -
Print speed Fast Medium Medium Fast Fast
Reference [19,88,104] [19,88,92] [19,88,203] [22,105] [110]