Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 20;8:623184. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.623184

Table 1.

Correlation of metabolite levels between screen-negatives and false-positives at early, standard and late AaBC.

Effect Size Number of False Positives (%)
Disorder Marker (20) Early Late Early Standard Late
CTD C0↓ 0.23+ −0.015 44 (9.3%) E: 102*** 381 (80.9%) E: 347 46 (9.8%) E: 22***
PA C3↑ 0.23# −0.11 29 (29.6%) E: 21 65 (66.3%) E: 72 4 (4.1%) E: 5
MMA C3↑ 0.23+ −0.11 66 (34.7%) E: 41*** 97 (51.1%) E: 140 27 (14.2%) E: 9***
IVA C5↑ 0.24+ 0.31& 12 (41.4%) E: 6* 16 (55.2%) E: 21 1 (3.5%) E: 1
VLCADD C14:1↑ −0.04 0.26& 20 (15.2%) E: 29 97 (73.5%) E: 97 15 (11.4%) E: 6**
CITR$ Citrulline↑ 0.06 0.28& 19 (19.6%) E: 21 68 (70.1%) E: 71 10 (10.3%) E: 4*
OTCD Citrulline↓ 0.06 0.28+ 27 (11.0%) E: 53 129 (52.7%) E: 181 89 (36.3%) E: 11***
HCY Methionine↑ 0.50# 0.34# 3 (25.0%) E: 3 9 (75.0%) E: 9 0 (0.0%) E: 1
PKU Phenylalanine↑ 0.55+ 0.41+ 51 (31.3%) E: 35* 112 (68.7%) E: 120 0 (0.0%) E: 7*
$

CITR includes three disorders (ASA, CIT-I, and CIT-II) detected through elevated citrulline levels.

*

P < 0.05;

**

P < 0.01;

***

P < 0.001.

The percentage difference between false positive and screen negative infants in early and late collection groups was compared using Chi-squared test. There are 90,060 (21.7%), 305,674 (73.7%), and 19,135 (4.6%) screen negative newborns in the early, standard and late collection groups, respectively. E indicates expected number of false positives.

#

Sample size of false positive cases is relatively small.

+

Consistent and

&

Inconsistent between Cohen's d and number of false-positives. See for definition in Supplementary Table 3.

Effect size analysis using Cohen's d for marker level differences between early (12–23 h) and late (49–168 h) collection-groups compared to the standard group (24–48 h). Cohen's d with absolute value larger than 0.2 in bold.