Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 Oct 24;121(2):253–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.087

Table 4.

Effect of beverage intakes on expected DFSARa at age 17 years, adjusted for other beverage intakes, toothbrushing frequency, sex, and SESb in Iowa Fluoride Study participants. (AICc = 1402.0)

Variable of interest Estimated multiplicative effect of exposure (95% CId)e P value
Milkf 0.88 (0.69–1.12) .293
Juicefg 0.51 (0.29–0.90) .019
SSBfh 1.40 (1.03–1.90) .034
Water/SFBfi 0.86 (0.69–1.07) .172
Toothbrushingj 0.59 (0.39–0.90) .014
Female indicator 1.45 (1.03–2.03) .031
Baseline SES—low 1 (reference)
Baseline SES—middle 0.79 (0.51–1.23) .302
Baseline SES—high 1.11 (0.71–1.74) .644
a

DFSAR = decayed and filled surfaces.

b

SES = socioeconomic status.

c

AIC = Akaike Information Criterion.

d

CI = confidence interval.

e

Estimated multiplicative effect of exposure of beverage on expected DFSAR from gender and SES adjusted generalized linear models based on the negative binomial distribution with a log link function.

f

Effect for each additional 8 oz beverage/d.

g

100% juice, including juice drinks before age 9 years.

h

SSB = sugar-sweetened beverages, including liquid juice drinks after 9 years.

i

Water/SFB = water and other sugar-free beverages.

j

Effect of each additional toothbrushing event/d.