Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul 18;19(8):1679–1687. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.07.026

Table 2.

Diagnostic follow-up characteristics of HCC patients (n=655)

Variable No delay (Diagnostic
follow-up
≤60 days) (%)
n=348
Diagnostic delay
>60 days (%)
n=307
P-value
Diagnostic evaluation method - - <0.001
 Imaging 261 (75.0) 240 (78.2)
 Biopsy 49 (14.1) 59 (19.2)
 AFP only 38 (10.9) 8 (2.6)
Diagnosis mechanism - - <0.001
 Incidental 20 (5.8) 27 (8.8)
 Diagnostic 229 (65.8) 130 (42.3)
 Surveillance 99 (28.5) 150 (48.9)
Provider adherence to AASLD guidelines - - <0.001
 Yes 292 (83.9) 169 (55.1)
 No 56 (16.1) 138 (45.0)
HCC cases non-adherent with AASLD guidelines reasoning¥ - - 0.02
 Preliminary dx w/out evidence 6 (10.9) 12 (8.9)
 Evaluated by provider but inappropriate tests ordered or non-recognition 29 (52.7) 56 (41.5)
 Patient missed appointment or declined workup 0 (0.0) 5 (3.7)
 Contraindication to triple-phase contrast or biopsy 14 (25.5) 20 (14.8)
 Other 6 (10.9) 42 (31.11)
Doubted diagnosis by provider - - 0.06
 Primary care/inpatient 11 (3.2) 19 (6.2)
 GI specialist 337 (96.8) 288 (93.8)
¥

n=190