. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;203:105032. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105032

Table 3.

Model comparison ANOVA results and change in AIC/BIC values for each parameter addition predicting PPVT vocabulary at age three. Negative change in AIC/BIC values indicates better model fit.

Model Year 2 Predictors	ANOVA Results	p value	AIC	ΔAIC	BIC	ΔBIC
Child Sex and Maternal Education			354.68		361.54
+ CCT vocabulary	F(1,37) = 15.21	<.001^**	342.56	−12.12	351.13	−10.41
+ VRL	F(1,37) = 10.66	.002^**	346.30	−8.38	354.87	−6.67
+ HRL	F(1,37) = 1.36	.25	355.20	.52	363.77	2.23

Controls + CCT vocabulary			342.56		351.13
+ VRL	F(1,36) = 3.32	.08	340.94	−1.61	351.23	.10

Controls + VRL			346.30		354.87
+ CCT vocabulary	F(1,36) = 7.08	.01^*	340.94	−5.36	351.23	−3.64

Note.

p < .05

^**

p < .01. Negative change in AIC/BIC values indicates better model fit.