Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2020 Nov 5;38(1):50–71. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2020.1837092

Table 3.

Summary of the SP and MPT-Naming models’ naming response type predictions and parameter associations with independent behavioral data. The “predictive parameters” column lists the model parameters that were found to have the strongest association with the relevant data. All parameters were used when generating cross-validation predictions. For the multi-word repetition tests, the reported R2 is from a multiple regression model using both parameters as predictors. The reported t values are standardized β coefficients from logistic regression models. LexForm, calculated from the MPT-Naming abilities, is the relative likelihood that a Formal error on a given naming trial originated from a failure at the lexical versus the phonological selection stage.

Language Measure Prediction / Association Measure SP Model Predictive Parameters MPT-Naming Model Predictive Parameters
Picture Naming Response Types
 Scale-level (n = 50, 7 categories) Mean RMSE 2.03 items All 1.89 items All
 Item-level (n = 18,200, 7-8 categories) Accuracy 42.40% All 67.51% All
Semantic Association Test Scores
 Synonymy Triplets (n = 127) R2 .47 S .51 LexSel
 Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (n = 127) R2 .38 S .47 LexSel
 Camels and Cactus Test (n = 127) R2 .42 S .47 LexSel
 Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (n = 75) R2 .06 P .19 LexSem
Speech Production Test Scores
 Diadochokinetic Rate (n = 66) R2 .18 P .22 Phon
 Nonword Repetition Test (n = 127) R2 .35 P .44 Phon
 Philadelphia Repetition Test (n = 127) R2 .26 P .41 Phon
 Immediate Serial Recall Span (n = 127) R2 .49 S, P .53 LexPhon, Phon
 WAB Repetition Subtest (n = 88) R2 .54 S, P .70 LexPhon, Phon
Formal Error Grammatical Categories
 Test-level rate of non-nouns (n = 83) R .32 S-P .43 LexPhon
 Item-level risk of non-noun (n = 1,504) t 2.13 S-P 2.94 LexPhon