Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 20;14:624036. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.624036

Table 4.

Heterogeneity in effect sizes and directionality of effect for studies meeting pre-specified criteria for cognitive, social, and sensory domains.

Domain Study Paradigm Dom Sub Mean Diff. Pooled SD g Dom v. Sub
Cognitive Varholick et al., 2019 Novel object discrimination 26 26 0.11 0.12 0.88 <
Varholick et al., 2018 Novel object discrimination 10 7 0.02 0.21 0.07 <
Fitchett et al., 2009 T-Maze 9 9 =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Fear conditioning 8 8 =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Morris water maze 8 8 =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Lashley III Maze 8 8 =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Odor Discrimination 8 8 =
Fitchett et al., 2005a T-Maze 6 6 0.41 0.63 0.65 >
Social Zhou et al., 2017 Social memory =
Kunkel and Wang, 2018 Social memory 8 8 15.14 11.38 1.39 >
Sensory Vekovishcheva and Sukhotina, 2000 Hot-plate 6 6 0 1.86 0 =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Hot-plate 8 8 =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Balance beam 8 8 =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Grip strength 8 8 =
Zhou et al., 2017 Grip strength =
Colas-Zelin et al., 2012 Balance pole 8 8 =

Data ordered by direction of effect and ascending Hedge's g, similar to forest plots. The directionality in the dominance subordinance relationship is noted in the “Dom vs. Sub” column and does not necessarily reflect statistical significance. Also, studies marked with a “=” sign in the “Dom vs. Sub” column did not report values in their study but reported that there was no significant difference between groups. A Hedge's g-value of more than 1 indicates a difference >1 standard deviation.