Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 26.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Brain Res. 2020 Nov 6;400:113006. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113006

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Startle response after the first and the last conditioning session to the original fear cue (FPS1, FPS8) and the former safety/now fear cue (FPS-R1, FPS-R8). In session 1 (FPS1 and FPS-R1) the response to the original fear cue in no JS mice differed significantly from their response to the former safety/now fear cue and from the original fear cue response of the JS group (A). Session 8 revealed a significant main effect for retardation that appeared to be carried by the JS group. Since no sex differences were observed, males and females were collapsed for graphical presentation. JS: juvenile stress, no JS: no juvenile stress, F: fear cue, S: safety cue. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 as indicated.