Table 2.

Mean absolute distance (MAD) in μm for eight surfaces (and the mean of those eight surfaces) evaluated on 55 manually delineated scans comparing Chiu et al. (2015), Karri et al. (2016), Rathke et al. (2017), and our proposed method. Numbers in bold are the best in that column. Our method is best for six of the eight surface, and is best overall.

	Mean	ILM	RNFL-GCL	IPL-INL	INL-OPL	OPL-ONL	IS-OS	OS-RPE	BM
Chiu et al. (2015)	7.82	6.59	8.38	9.04	11.02	11.01	4.84	5.74	5.91
Karri et al. (2016)	9.54	4.47	11.77	11.12	17.54	16.74	4.99	5.35	4.30
Rathkeetal. (2017)	7.71	4.66	6.78	8.87	11.02	13.60	4.61	7.06	5.11
Our Method	6.70	4.51	6.71	8.29	10.71	9.88	4.41	4.52	4.61