Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 21;28(2):758–765. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08864-1

Table 2:

Comparison of propensity score–matched patients who underwent resection for gastric adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant therapy (n=130).a

CT (n=65) CRT (n=65) P Value

Age, years 62±12 61±13 0.843
Male 58.5% 53.8% 0.362
Race 0.751
  White 50.8% 60.0%
  Hispanic 21.5% 15.4%
  Black 12.3% 13.8%
  Other 15.4% 10.8%
Histology 0.362
  Well Differentiated 1.5% 0.0%
  Moderately Differentiated 24.6% 23.1%
  Poorly Differentiated 70.8% 76.9%
  Other 3.1% 0.0%
Signet Ring Cells 53.8% 43.1% 0.146
Linitis Plastica 6.3% 1.6% 0.187
EUS T stage 0.543
  cT1 3.0% 1.5%
  cT2 13.8% 7.7%
  cT3 73.8% 72.3%
  cT4 6.2% 13.9%
  cTx 3.1% 3.1%
EUS N Stage 0.762
  cN0 52.3% 46.2%
  cN1 41.5% 47.7%
  cN2 3.1% 1.5%
  cN3 0.0% 1.5%
  cNx 3.1% 3.1%
Procedure Performed 0.155
  Total Gastrectomy 41.5% 58.5%
  Subtotal/Distal Gastrectomy 53.9% 38.5%
  Proximal Gastrectomy 4.6% 3.1%
Lymphadenectomy, 15 or more 84.6% 81.5% 0.408
Mean LN Removed 32±20 25±12 0.011
Median LOS, days 11(9–14) 11(10–17) 0.665
Complications
  Wound 18.5% 16.9% 0.501
  Intraabdominal Infection 9.2% 12.3% 0.389
  Leak 1.5% 7.7% 0.104
  Respiratory 7.7% 15.4% 0.136
  Renal 1.5% 3.1% 0.501
  Cardiac 4.6% 6.2% 0.499
  Anemia 6.2% 4.6% 0.501
  Other 18.5% 10.8% 0.161
ypT Stage <0.001
  ypT0 1.5% 27.7%
  ypT1 23.0% 16.9%
  ypT2 10.8% 23.1%
  ypT3 36.9% 23.1%
  ypT4 26.2% 9.2%
ypN Stage 0.039
  ypN0 42.2% 66.2%
  ypN1 26.6% 18.5%
  ypN2 17.2% 9.2%
  ypN3 14.1% 6.2%
DFS 0.067
  Median DFS, mo(95% CI) 51(5–97) 122(69–175)
  5 year DFS 49.2% 70.1%
OS 0.209
  Median OS, mo(95% CI) 71(24–118) 122(69–175)
  5 year OS 52.4% 69.2%

a

CT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; CRT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; IQR, interquartile range; DFS, disease-free survival; CI, confidence interval; OS, overall survival.