Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 13.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Host Microbe. 2020 Oct 28;29(1):107–120.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.10.001

Figure 5. CRISPRi-seq identified PurA as important for infection.

Figure 5.

(A) Comparison of fitness cost of gene depletion by CRISPRi by different sgRNAs between the mouse lung infection model at 24 hpi and C+Y medium. The difference was shown as the log2 fold change between the two conditions by DEseq2 analysis and the P-values are adjusted by FDR. The highlighted sgRNAs were selected for follow-up studies. (B) Growth of the deletion mutants and the wild-type D39V strain in C+Y medium. Cell density was determined by measuring OD595nm every 10 minutes. The values represent averages of three technical replicates with SEM (same for panel E). (C-D) Mouse infection with individual mutants, compared to wild type D39V. Each dot represents a single mouse. Mean with SEM was plotted. (C) The mutants were tested in three batches of infection assays, for each assay the wild-type strain was tested in parallel. Significant difference between D39V and ΔpurA was tested by Sidak’s multiple comparisons test, and the adjusted p value is 0.0158. (D) Validation study of sgRNA0005 targets. The virulence of deletion mutants and complementation strains were tested and compared to wild type D39V. There was a significant difference between the wild-type and ΔpurA strain tested by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-analysis, and the adjusted p-value was 0.0007. Note that ectopic expression of purA complemented the phenotype of the purA deletion mutant. (E) Growth of ΔpurA in blood-like medium lacking adenine, adenosine, guanine, uracil, uridine, xanthine, and complete medium.