Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 1;25:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.100916

Table 1.

Examples of ImageJ quantitation method validation with other analytical approaches post cataract surgery (PCS).

Gene ID and description Transcriptome analysis (RNAseq) Fiji quantitation Additional analytical tools Remarks and references
Acta2 actin, alpha 2, smooth muscle, aorta (αSMA) 0 h vs 48 hImage 51
FC- (4.4)
FDR- 3.39E-08
0 h vs 3 dImage 51
FC- (8.87)
***P < 0.001
0 h vs 5 dImage 51
FC- (6.35)
*P = 0.013
Fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS)
0 h vs 5 dImage 51
FC- (2.92)
***P < 0.001
Consistent and validated [1]
Cdh1 cadherin 1 (E− cadherin) 0 h vs 48 hImage 52
FC- (−2.12)
FDR- 7.0E-05
0 h vs 48 hImage 52
FC- (−1.68)
*P = 0.019
Qualitative immunofluorescent image observation
0 h vs 5 d
DownregulationImage 52
Consistent and validated [1]
Col1a1
Collagen, type I, alpha 1
0 h vs 48 hImage 51
FC- (83)
FDR- 2.1E-42
0 h vs 48 hImage 51
FC- (7.35)
***P < 0.001
Qualitative immunofluorescent image observation
0 h vs 48 h Robust expression/upregulationImage 51
Consistent and validated [1]
Tnc tenascin C 0 h vs 48 hImage 51
FC- (116)
FDR- 7.7E-44
0 h vs 48 hImage 51
FC- 12.78
**P = 0.005
qRT-PCRImage 51
0 h vs 24 h
***P < 0.0001
Consistent and validated [1,18]

h-hour, d-day, FC- fold change, FDR-false discovery rate, FACS- Fluorescence-activated cell sorting, P - probability value, qRT-PCR- Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR.

Image 51-- Upregulation, Image 52-- Downregulation.