Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;13:26. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00985-4

Table 2.

Performance of the early detection model based on ctDNA methylation in the training and test sets

Patient group Youden's index best High specificity High sensitivity
Tested Positive Positive rate (%) Tested Positive Positive rate (%) Tested Positive Positive rate (%)
Training set
Stage I 34 27 79.4% (62.1–91.2%) 34 23 67.6% (49.4–82.6%) 34 28 82.4% (65.5–93.2%)
Stage II 54 48 88.9% (77.3–95.8%) 54 46 85.2% (72.8–93.4%) 54 48 88.9% (77.4–95.8%)
Stage III 35 32 91.4% (76.9–98.2%) 35 28 80.0% (63.1–91.6%) 35 33 94.3% (80.9–99.3%)
Stage IV 26 25 96.2% (80.3–99.9%) 26 23 88.5% (69.7–97.5%) 26 25 96.2% (80.3–99.9%)
All cancer 149 132 88.6% (82.4–93.2%) 149 120 80.6% (73.2–86.6%) 149 134 89.9% (83.9–94.3%)
Healthy control 149 16 10.7% (6.3–16.9%) 149 8 5.4% (2.4–10.3%) 149 21 14.1% (9.0–20.7%)
Test set
Stage I 17 12 70.6% (43.9–89.6%) 17 11 64.7% (38.2–85.8%) 17 12 70.6% (44.0–89.7%)
Stage II 25 22 88.0% (68.6–97.4%) 25 22 88.0% (68.8–97.5%) 25 22 88.0% (68.6–97.4%)
Stage III 15 13 86.7% (59.6–98.4%) 15 12 80.0% (52.0–95.7%) 15 13 86.7% (59.6–98.4%)
Stage IV 10 9 90.0% (55.2–99.7%) 10 9 90.0% (55.4–99.7%) 10 9 90.0% (55.6–99.7%)
All cancer 67 56 83.6% (72.5–91.6%) 67 54 80.6% (69.1–89.3%) 67 56 83.6% (72.4–91.6%)
Healthy control 74 6 8.1% (3.0–16.8%) 74 3 4.1% (0.8–11.4%) 74 6 8.1% (3.0–16.9%)