Table 1.
Rating scale used for BWM and VIKOR techniques
| Scale for BWM technique (adapted from Rezaei et al. 2014) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
| Equal importance | Somewhat between equal and moderate | Moderately more important | Somewhat between Moderate and Strong | Strongly more important | Somewhat between strong and very strong | Very strongly important | Somewhat between very strong and absolute | Absolutely more important | |
| Scale for VIKOR technique | |||||||||
| Least important | 1 | ||||||||
| Moderately important | 2 | ||||||||
| Strongly important | 3 | ||||||||
| Very strongly important | 4 | ||||||||
| Extremely important | 5 | ||||||||