Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 13;8(3):2002148. doi: 10.1002/advs.202002148

Table 1.

Summary of caffeine sensitivity (EC50 values) for representative acVHH variants and biCOSMO variants tested in the study. n = 16 cells from three independent assays. Variants with functional validation were highlighted in bold

Variantsa) EC50
WT (567.5 ± 1.6) × 10−9 m
Y104W (COSMO) (95.1 ± 1.2) × 10−9 m
Y104F (3990.2 ± 4.7) × 10−9 m
Y34W >20 × 10−6 m
Y34F No binding
Y108W >2 × 10−6 m
Y108F No binding
Y61W >1 × 10−6 m
Y61F No binding
F39W No binding
F39Y No binding
W111F No binding
W111Y No binding
M63L No binding
biCOSMO‐S (16.9 ± 2.0) × 10−9 m
biCOSMO‐L Intramolecular binding
2 × WT acVHH‐S (530.9 ± 1.6) × 10−9 m