Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 21;6(1):54–65. doi: 10.1080/23335432.2019.1629839

Table 5.

Pairwise comparison results from post-hoc testing of two-way repeated-measures ANOVA investigating the mean difference of peak medial contact force between baseline (shod) and selected treatment outcome based for the Linearly scaled and MRI-based models (%BW).

          95% Confidence Interval for Difference
Baseline
(I)
Gait alteration selection
applied to group (J)
Mean Difference
(I-J) [%BW]
Std. Error P-value Lower Bound Upper Bound
LS-Model
Shod 0° LW 1.440 3.442 1.000 −11.792 14.673
5° LW 3.099 5.496 1.000 −18.034 24.232
10° LW −3.303 5.622 1.000 −24.917 18.312
Toe-in 12.765 4.735 0.487 −5.441 30.971
Toe-out 7.893 6.896 1.000 −18.622 34.408
Wide 14.313 5.730 0.716 −7.717 36.343
Based on Individual Patient 20.514* 4.486 0.012 3.267 37.761
MS-Model
Shod 0° LW 1.106 3.789 1.000 −13.461 15.672
5° LW −3.038 6.048 1.000 −26.293 20.217
10° LW −3.126 4.911 1.000 −22.006 15.754
Toe-in 12.538 6.201 1.000 −11.305 36.381
Toe-out −4.442 6.639 1.000 −29.967 21.082
Wide 1.072 6.496 1.000 −23.905 26.049
Based on Individual Patient 18.748* 4.442 0.024 1.669 35.827

The bold rows, ‘Based on Individual Patient’, examine the gait alterations select individually for each patient, based on the greatest reduction in load, rather than applying the same treatment to the entire patient group. * denotes that result is significant to (α = 0.05)