Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 20;11:630282. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.630282

TABLE 1.

Summary of the results and summary of the participants and intervention characteristics of the studies which investigated the acute effects of stretching on running economy and running performance.

Study Subjects Stretching intervention
Main outcome in % change
Muscle (group) Type/duration
Allison et al., 2008 Ten male runners (Ø VO2 max. 60.1 ± 7.3 ml/kg/min)
Age: 25 ± 5
Lower body Eight static stretches of 4 × 40 s (unilateral) ↑ RoM (sit and reach) (nr% pre to post)
↓ CMJ height (5.5% pre to post)
↓ Isometric strength (5.6% pre to post)
↔ Changes in oxygen uptake (0% pre to post)
↔ Changes in minute ventilation (+2.26% pre to post)
↔ Changes in energy expenditure (+0.65% pre to post)
↑ RoM (sit and reach) (nr; compared with the control condition)
↓ Drop jump height (nr; compared with the control condition)
Damasceno et al., 2014 Eleven male long distance runners (Ø VO2 max. 51.0 ± 3.0 ml/kg/min)
Age: 35.7 ± 6.1
Lower body Seven static stretches of 3 × 30 s each Constant speed test variables (at 12 km/h; all compared to the control condition)
↔ Changes in running economy (−2.22%)
↔ Changes in caloric unit cost (−3.00%)
↑ Stride time (1.83%)
↔ Changes in contact time (−2.40%)
↔ Changes in flight time (+1.99%)
↑ iEMG of biceps femoris (22.34%)
↔ Changes in iEMG of gastrocnemius med. (+19.20%)
↔ Changes in iEMG of vastus med. (6.25%)
Time/trial test variables (for 3 km)
↔ Changes in overall running time (+1.01%)
↑ RoM (hip flexion): static (28.92%), PNF (15.58%) (pre to post);
↑ RoM (hip extension): static (36.36%), PNF (69.23%) (pre to post)
Godges et al., 1989 Seven males Hip extensors –>Static stretching group: 10 min Oxygen consumption following static stretching:
Age: 20 –>PNF stretching group: like static, but including soft tissue mobilization ↓ Oxygen consumption at 40% of VO2 max (6.64%) (pre to post)
↓ Oxygen consumption at 60% of VO2 max (4.16%) (pre to post)
↓ Oxygen consumption at 80% of VO2 max (3.83%) (pre to post)
Oxygen consumption following PNF stretching:
↔ Changes in oxygen consumption at 40% of VO2 max
(−3.14%) (pre to post)
↓ Oxygen consumption at 60% of VO2 max (3.75%) (pre to post);
↔ Changes in oxygen consumption at 80% of VO2 max
(−2.34%) (pre to post)
Hayes and Walker, 2007 Seven male middle and long distance runners (Ø VO2 max. 66.8 ± 7.0 ml/kg/min)
Age: 32.5 ± 7.7
Lower body five exercises In all three techniques
@ 2 × 30 s for: ↑RoM (sit and reach): static (nr), progressive static (nr), dynamic (nr) (pre to post)
>Static stretching ↔ Changes in running economy: static (1.04%)
>Progressive static stretching Progressive static (1.83%), dynamic (0.86%) (compared with the control condition)
>Dynamic stretching ↔ Changes in steady-state oxygen uptake
Static: nr, progressive static; nr, dynamic: nr (compared with the control condition)
↑ RoM (sit and reach) (17.22% pre to post)
Lowery et al., 2014 Ten male distance runners (Ø VO2 max 64.9 ± 6.5 ml/kg/min) Age: 24 ± 5 Lower body Six static stretches
of 3 × 30 s each
↓ One-mile uphill run time (3.07% compared with the control condition)
↑ Ground contact time (12.58% pre to post)
↑ Muscle activation (15.71% pre to post)
↑ RoM (sit and reach) (pre to post 11.07%)
Mojock et al., 2011 Twelve female long distance runners (Ø VO2 max 48.4
±5.1 ml/kg/min
Age: 30 ± 9
Lower body Five static stretches
of 2 × 60 s each
Preload run variables (at 65% VO2 max—compared to the control condition)
↔ Changes in average heart rate (+1.88%)
↔ Changes in rate of perceived exertion (0%)
↔ Changes in energy expenditure (0%)
↔ Changes in 65% VO2 (+0.29%)
Performance run variables (compared to the control condition)
↔ Changes in average heart rate (+1.13%)
↔ Changes in heart rate max (+0.53%)
↔ Changes in rate of perceived exertion average (0%)
↔ Changes in rate of perceived exertion max (0%)
↔ Changes in running speed (0%)
↔ Changes in covered distance (−0.18%)
Takizawa et al., 2015 Seven male middle or long distance runners (Ø VO2 max. 72.3
±3.7 ml/kg/min)
Age: 21.3 ± 2.1
Lower body Five static stretches
of 1 × 20 s each
↔ Changes at time to exhaustion at 90% of VO2 max
(−0.17% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in oxygen uptake (nr% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in vastus lateralis temperature after stretching (−1.09% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in blood lactate accumulation after stretching (+11.00% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in blood lactate accumulation after performance run (+5.21% compared with the control condition)
Wilson et al., 2010 Ten male distance runners (Ø VO2 max 63.8 ± 2.8 ml/kg/min) Age: 25 ± 7 Lower body Five static stretches
of 4 × 30 s each
↑ Performance in a 30-min run (3.44% compared with the control condition) ↑ Energy expenditure during 30-min performance run (4.71% compared with the control condition)
Yamaguchi et al., 2015 Seven male middle or long distance runners (Ø VO2 max. 72.3 ± 3.7 ml/kg/min)
Age: 21.3 ± 2.1
Lower body Five dynamic stretches with 10 reps as fast as possible (total = 217
± 17 s)
↑ Time to exhaustion (15.43% compared with the control condition)
↑ Total running distance (15.91% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in VO2 (−0.95% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in lactate (+ 8.39% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in heart rate (+0.11% compared with the control condition)
Yamaguchi et al., 2020 Sixteen male long distance runners (Ø VO2 max. 71.9 ± 3.6 ml/kg/min)
Age: 20.9 ± 2.1
Lower body Five dynamic stretches with 10 reps as fast as possible (total = 220
± 9 s)
↑ Time to exhaustion (16.78% compared with the running warm-up)
↔ Differences in VO2 uptake between dynamic stretching group and running warm-up group during assessment of running performance
Zourdos et al., 2012 Fourteen male trained runners
(VO2 max 63.1 ± 8.3 ml/kg/min)
Age: 23.0 ± 4.3
Lower body Ten dynamic stretches with 2 × 4 reps (total = 900 s) ↑ RoM (sit and reach) (16.41% pre to post)
↑ Resting VO2 (35.48% pre to post)
↑ Energy cost during 30-min preload run (4.18% compared with the control condition)
↔ Changes in the distance run (−3.28% compared with the control condition)

RoM, range of motion; CMJ, countermovement jump; ↑, significant increase; ↓, significant decrease; ↔, no significant change; nr, not reported.