Table 2.
Effect of occupational stress dimensions on anger through resiliency, n = 201
| Predictor (X) | Mediator (M) | Criterion (Y) | Total effect (c′ path) | Direct effect (c path) | Indirect effect (ab path) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model R2 | PE (SE) | BC 95% CI | |||||
| ORQ Role Overload | CD-RISC | Anger | .25** | 0.05 (0.01)*** | 0.04 (0.01) *** | 0.01 (0.01)*** | (0.00–0.013) |
| ORQ Role Insufficiency | CD-RISC | Anger | .09** | 0.03 (0.01)** | 0.02 (0.01)* | 0.01 (0.00)** | (0.01–0.02) |
| ORQ Role Ambiguity | CD-RISC | Anger | .07*** | 0.03 (0.01)*** | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.00)*** | (0.01–0.02) |
| ORQ Role Boundary | CD-RISC | Anger | .21*** | 0.05 (0.01)*** | 0.04 (0.01)*** | 0.01 (0.00)*** | (0.00–0.01) |
| ORQ Responsibility | CD-RISC | Anger | .29*** | 0.05 (0.01)* | 0.04 (0.01)*** | 0.01 (0.00)* | (0.00–0.01) |
| ORQ Physical Environment | CD-RISC | Anger | .02 | 0.02 (0.01) | 0.01 (0.01) | 0.00 (0.01) | (− 0.01–0.02) |
Mediation analyses conducted using k = 10,000
ORQ Occupational Role Questionnaire, CD-RISC Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Anger DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Anger subscale
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001