Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;100(2):1239–1247. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.093

Table 3.

Effect of woody breast (WB) condition on the texture profile analysis of cooked chicken patties.

Treatment (mixture)1 Hardness (N) Cohesiveness Springiness Chewiness (N)
T1) 100% NOR 30.11 ± 1.57a 0.78 ± 0.01a 0.91 ± 0.01a 21.45 ± 0.98a
T2) 67% NOR + 33% MIL 28.64 ± 0.70a 0.77 ± 0.01a 0.83 ± 0.01a,b 18.40 ± 0.56a,b
T3) 67% NOR + 33% SEV 27.97 ± 1.10a,b 0.75 ± 0.01a,b 0.81 ± 0.02b 16.88 ± 0.89b,c
T4) 33% NOR + 67% MIL 28.13 ± 1.46a,b 0.76 ± 0.01a,b 0.85 ± 0.01a,b 18.00 ± 0.90a,b
T5) 33% NOR + 67% SEV 23.43 ± 0.87b,c 0.75 ± 0.01a,b 0.81 ± 0.02b 14.28 ± 0.83c,d
T6) 100% MIL 20.55 ± 1.24c 0.74 ± 0.01a,b 0.79 ± 0.02b 12.10 ± 0.94d
T7) 67% MIL + 33% SEV 19.14 ± 1.21c,d 0.74 ± 0.01a,b 0.80 ± 0.02b 11.33 ± 0.69d,e
T8) 33% MIL + 67% SEV 18.62 ± 0.56c,d 0.75 ± 0.02a,b 0.81 ± 0.03b 11.29 ± 0.51d,e
T9) 100% SEV 14.56 ± 0.50d 0.71 ± 0.01b 0.78 ± 0.02b 8.09 ± 0.45e

a-eMeans ± SEM with no common superscripts within a column differ significantly (P < 0.05).

1

MIL, mild WB meat; NOR, normal breast meat; SEV, moderate or severe WB meat.