Table 8.
Item | Yield, % of chilled carcass |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Breast | Pectoralis major | Pectoralis minor | Wings | Legs | Breast skin | Rack | |
XL, BXU/kg | |||||||
0 | 35.07 | 29.18 | 5.88 | 9.69 | 30.31 | 3.82 | 20.83 |
8,000 | 35.18 | 29.05 | 6.11 | 9.67 | 29.96 | 3.61 | 21.00 |
16,000 | 35.33 | 29.23 | 6.07 | 9.70 | 30.16 | 3.80 | 20.39 |
32,000 | 35.11 | 29.15 | 5.96 | 9.73 | 30.17 | 3.75 | 20.81 |
AA density, % | |||||||
Low | 35.19 | 29.16 | 5.94 | 9.75 | 30.11 | 3.83a | 20.75 |
High | 35.15 | 29.14 | 6.07 | 9.64 | 30.19 | 3.66b | 20.77 |
AF, % | |||||||
0 | 35.24 | 29.31 | 5.99 | 9.67 | 30.15 | 3.78 | 20.76 |
1.17 | 35.15 | 28.99 | 6.02 | 9.72 | 30.15 | 3.71 | 20.75 |
Pooled SEM (n = 6)1 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.18 |
CV, % | 3.91 | 3.81 | 4.80 | 2.93 | 2.77 | 6.10 | 4.08 |
Effect, P-value2 | |||||||
XL | 0.959 | 0.953 | 0.100 | 0.928 | 0.503 | 0.095 | 0.144 |
AA density | 0.575 | 0.951 | 0.089 | 0.154 | 0.630 | 0.009 | 0.895 |
AF | 0.897 | 0.202 | 0.679 | 0.541 | 0.987 | 0.241 | 0.949 |
XL × AA density | 0.503 | 0.538 | 0.241 | 0.039 | 0.497 | 0.564 | 0.445 |
XL × AF | 0.260 | 0.097 | 0.224 | 0.114 | 0.169 | 0.301 | 0.411 |
AA density × AF | 0.595 | 0.158 | 0.857 | 0.859 | 0.768 | 0.306 | 0.853 |
XL × AA density × AF | 0.478 | 0.955 | 0.484 | 0.076 | 0.707 | 0.932 | 0.897 |
Multiple linear regressions for XL | |||||||
Linear | 0.640 | 0.907 | 0.209 | 0.662 | 0.561 | 0.654 | 0.315 |
Quadratic | 0.324 | 0.978 | 0.028 | 0.796 | 0.360 | 0.366 | 0.243 |
a,bMeans within a column, not sharing a common superscript, are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Six replicate pens per treatment with 3 broilers sampled among 22 broilers.
Only means for significant interactions are showed (P < 0.05). Moreover, XL × AA density interaction was significant (P < 0.05) for wings yield (see Figure 4).