. 2020 Nov 2;100(2):835–843. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.047

Table 5.

Effects of magnolol on egg quality of storage eggs.

Items	C	M100	M200	M300	SEM	P	P-value
Items	C	M100	M200	M300	SEM	P	Linear	Quadratic
Fresh egg weight (g)	61.30	61.71	60.49	62.98	0.47	0.29	0.36	0.27
Stored egg weight (g)	60.32	60.79	59.57	61.93	0.47	0.32	0.37	0.31
Weight loss ratio (%)	1.64	1.50	1.52	1.57	0.04	0.55	0.58	0.19
Albumen height (mm)	2.59^b	3.14^a	3.05^a	2.83^a,b	0.07	0.04	0.34	<0.01
HU	36.90^c	46.29^a	44.93^a,b	39.8^b,c	1.10	<0.01	0.44	<0.01
Yolk weight (g)	16.80	16.53	16.84	17.20	0.11	0.18	0.08	0.42
Yolk index	28.03	27.26	28.22	27.85	0.21	0.43	0.83	0.66
MDA content of yolk (nmol/g)	100.27	104.27	98.00	101.47	2.87	0.91	0.92	0.97

^a–cMeans not sharing a common superscript letter within the same row differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Abbreviations: C, control group; HU, Haugh unit; M100, M200, and M300, control diets supplemented with 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg of magnolol, respectively; MDA, malondialdehyde.