Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 18;100(2):875–886. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.10.070

Table 2.

Effect of B. subtilis–fermented products on the growth performance of broilers.

Item C1 CL2 LL3 HL4 SEM P value P value5
Linear Quadratic
Body weight (g/bird)
 1 d 45.4 45.4 45.4 45.4 0.02 0.883 0.114 0.874
 14 d 374.9 385.8 381.3 406.3 6.46 0.620 0.189 0.469
 21 d 638.5 611.6 619.5 660.4 8.31 0.224 0.012 0.609
Average daily gain (g/d/bird)
 1–14 d 23.5 24.3 24.0 25.8 0.46 0.622 0.192 0.469
 15–21 d 37.7a 32.3b 34.0a,b 36.3a,b 0.68 0.042 0.008 0.730
 1–21 d 28.2 27.0 27.3 29.3 0.40 0.225 0.012 0.609
Average daily feed intake (g/d/bird)
 1–14 d 26.0 26.5 27.4 27.5 0.42 0.402 0.443 0.627
 15–21 d 65.8 63.6 67.7 66.7 1.96 0.485 0.700 0.613
 1–21 d 39.3 38.9 41.6 40.6 1.03 0.392 0.714 0.487
Feed conversion ratio
 1–14 d 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.02 0.694 0.599 0.259
 15–21 d 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.8 0.06 0.469 0.446 0.685
 1–21 d 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 0.03 0.241 0.501 0.315

a, bMeans within a row lacking a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).

1

C, control broilers without lipopolysaccharide challenge.

2

CL, lipopolysaccharide-challenged broilers.

3

LL, 1 g/kg of B. subtilis–fermented product–treated and lipopolysaccharide-challenged broilers.

4

HL, 3 g/kg of B. subtilis–fermented product–treated and lipopolysaccharide-challenged broilers.

5

Data were analyzed using the results of the CL, LL, and HL group.