Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 2;12(2):244–253. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13336

Table 1.

Characteristics of the study participants

n (Female : male) 281 (107:174)
Age (years) 68 (62–71)
Duration of diabetes (years) 13 (7–23)
BMI (kg/m2) 24.1 (22.0–26.9)
HbA1c (%) 6.9 (6.5–7.5)
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) 71.5 (60.9–82.0)
UACR (mg/gCr) 14.1 (6.1–46.2)
Hypertension 177 (63.0%)
Dyslipidemia 227 (80.8%)
CGM
Mean sensor glucose (mg/dL) 137.4 (119.2–159.0)
SD (mg/dL) 36.7 (29.9–45.0)
CV (%) 26.4 (22.4–30.6)
TIR70–180 (%) 78.9 (66.9–90.4)
TAR>180 (%) 15.5 (6.6–30.5)
TAR>250 (%) 0.8 (0–4.5)
TBR<70 (%) 0.3 (0–2.5)
TBR<54 (%) 0 (0–0.2)
HBGI 3.5 (2.2–5.6)
LBGI 0.9 (0.4–2.0)
Antidiabetic drugs
Metformin 152 (54.1%)
Sulfonylureas 55 (19.6%)
Glinides 23 (8.2%)
Thiazolidines 23 (8.2%)
α‐Glucosidase inhibitors 52 (18.5%)
DPP‐4 inhibitors 149 (53.0%)
SGLT2 inhibitors 72 (25.6%)
Insulin 74 (26.3%)
GLP‐1 receptor agonists 37 (13.2%)

The results are shown as the median values (interquartile range). BMI, body mass index; CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; CV, coefficient of variation; DPP‐4, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GLP‐1, glucagon‐like peptide‐1; HBGI, high blood glucose index; LBGI, low blood glucose index; SD, standard deviation; SGLT2, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2; TAR, time above range; TBR, time below range; TIR, time in range; UACR, urine albumin‐to‐creatinine ratio.