Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 19;100(2):1213–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.019

Table 3.

Impact of continuous and intermittent thermal stress on the productive performance of quails.

Traits First group (control) Second group (CTS/39.5°C) Third group (ITS/39.5°C) SEM P-value
Chick weight at hatch (g) 8.13a 7.97a 8.19a 0.104 0.3288
Body weight (5 wk) 261.58a 247.10b 256.57a 2.154 0.0001
Total weight gain (g) 253.45a 239.14b 248.38a 2.157 0.0001
Daily weight gain (g) 7.24a 6.83b 7.10a 0.062 0.0001
Total feed intake (g) 783.81a 747.96b 760.96c 2.875 0.0001
Daily feed intake (g) 22.39a 21.37c 21.74b 0.082 0.0001
Feed conversion ratio 3.11a 3.16a 3.10a 0.033 0.4153
ASM (d) 36.05a 34.75b 35.112a 0.314 0.0174
BWSM (g) 281.56a 267.89b 275.73a,b 3.261 0.0198
Weight of first egg (g) 10.48a 9.80a 9.90a 0.3548 0.3485

a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).

Abbreviations: ASM (d), age at sexual maturity; BWSM (g), body weight at sexual maturity; CTS, continuous thermal stress; CW (g), chick weight; ITS, intermittent thermal stress.