Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 26;100(2):575–584. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.11.027

Table 7.

Effect of experimental diets and Eimeria spp. challenge on broiler chicken ileum gene expression at 20 d of age.1

Item NCU NCC OE500 C OE1500 C PCC SEM2 P-values3
NCU vs. NCC OE linear OE nonlinear
TLR4 9.49 9.76 9.59 10.1 9.75 0.24 0.44 0.25 0.36
IL-1β 12.5 12.0 12.3 11.9 12.1 0.26 0.24 0.68 0.38
IL-8 8.27 8.73 7.90 8.29 8.51 0.43 0.46 0.63 0.20
IFN-γ 12.1 11.2 10.3 10.1 10.7 0.38 0.11 0.077 0.27
Bu-1 6.45 5.98 5.85 6.01 6.36 0.26 0.22 0.86 0.67
Claudin 1 11.3 11.9 11.7 11.9 11.5 0.40 0.30 0.98 0.66

Abbreviations: Bu-1, B-cell marker; IL-1β, interleukin 1β; IL-8, interleukin 8; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; OE, Olea europaea; TLR4, toll-like receptor.

1

NCU, negative control with no additives and no challenge; NCC, OE500 C, OE1500 C, basal diet containing 0, 500, and 1,500 ppm of olive pomace extract and challenged, respectively; PCC, basal diet containing 500 ppm of Clinacox and challenged. Values are increments of cycle threshold (ΔCt) of target gene relative to housekeeping. Ct values are inversely related to RNA abundance.

2

SEM (n = 10).

3

Challenged treatments were not significantly different by Tukey's test.