Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Burns. 2020 Aug 4;47(3):692–697. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.07.022

Table 2.

Bivariate analysis of factors associated with the Neuro-QoL stigma score.

Neuro-QoL stigma
Variables Mean ± SD P value
Sex 0.016
 Female 49 ± 8.7
 Male 47 ± 8.1
Race 0.042
 White 47 ± 8.2
 Black or African American 51 ± 9.7
 Other 46 ± 7.7
Burn type 0.210
 Fire or flame 48 ± 8.6
 Scald 46 ± 7.7
 Grease 46 ± 7.3
 Electrical 49 ± 10
 Other 46 ± 7.5
Circumstances <0.001
 Not work-related 47 ± 8.2
 Work-related 48 ± 8.5
 Recreational 46 ± 7.3
 Assault or self-inflicted 56 ± 7.9
 Other 46 ± 7.9
Burn location
 Head, neck or face <0.001
  Yes 49 ± 8.4
  No 46 ± 8.0
 Trunk 0.002
  Yes 49 ± 8.8
  No 46 ± 7.6
 Shoulder and upper arm 0.002
  Yes 49 ± 8.7
  No 46 ± 7.8
 Forearm or hand 0.002
  Yes 48 ± 8.6
  No 44 ± 6.7
 Leg or foot 0.523
  Yes 48 ± 8.7
  No 47 ± 7.6
 Perineal or genital 0.072
  Yes 49 ± 8.5
  No 47 ± 8.3
Involvement of dominant hand 0.009
 Yes 49 ± 8.5
 No 46 ± 8.1
Amputated limb <0.001
 Yes 54 ± 9.4
 No 47 ± 8.1
Variables Correlation P value
Age −0.16 0.003
Percentage of body burned 0.24 <0.001
Percentage of body grafted 0.25 <0.001
Length of hospital stay 0.26 <0.001
Operating room visits 0.28 <0.001
Community integration score
 Pre-injury −0.0089 0.874
 1-year −0.31 <0.001

Bold indicates a statistically significant difference; continuous variables as mean (±standard deviation); discrete variables as number (percentage). All variables with P<0.05 were moved to multivariable regression analysis.