Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 22;11(1):181–220. doi: 10.1007/s13555-020-00463-y

Table 4.

Efficacy ranking of treatments at PASI 90 or PASI75 across network meta-analyses

graphic file with name 13555_2020_463_Tab4_HTML.jpg

ADA adalimumab, BRO brodalumab, CZP certolizumab pegol, ETN etanercept, GUS guselkumab, IFX infliximab, IXE ixekizumab, N not reported, PASI psoriasis area severity index, RIS risankizumab, SEC secukinumab, TIL tildrakizumab, UST ustekinumab, WB weight-based dosing, Y reported. Green denotes treatments ranked 1–3, orange 4–6, and grey 7–9. Treatments in brackets are statistically significantly less efficacious

aPaper considered this approximately the same rank (reported "ustekinumab ≈ adalimumab ≈ etanercept" based on PASI 75 in spite of results OR for ustekinumab vs. etanercept 1.94 (95% CrI 1.31, 3.01)

bThe multinomial probit model used in this analysis ensures that the rankings observed at PASI 75 will apply for PASI 90

cReported as “clear/nearly clear” but input data related to PASI 90 or PGA 0/1

dBased on maximum area under the curve

eBased on outcomes at week 12