Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;60(5):615–625. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.01.041

Table 3.

Test Characteristics of CXR and LUS vs. Nasopharyngeal RT-PCR

CXR with Atelectasis CXR without Atelectasis LUS LUS Expert Review Pleural Line Irregularity
Sensitivity 67.2 (4.31–78.4) 56.3 (43.3–68.6) 96.9 (89.2–99.6) 100 (94.4–100) 26.6 (16.3–39.1)
Specificity 29.7 (15.9–47.0) 43.2 (27.1–60.5) 13.5 (4.54–28.8) 13.5 (4.54%–28.8) 70.3 (53.0–84.1)
Positive likelihood ratio 0.96 (0.73–1.25) 0.99 (0.70–1.41) 1.12 (0.98–1.28) 1.16 (1.02–1.31) 0.89 (0.47–1.70)
Negative likelihood ratio 1.10 (0.60–2.02) 1.01 (0.64–1.61) 0.23 (0.05–1.13) 0.00 1.05 (0.81–1.35)
Odds ratio 0.87 (0.36–2.08) 0.98 (0.43–2.22) 4.84 (0.89–26.4) 21.8 (1.17–407.1) 0.85 (0.35–2.10)
Positive predictive value 62.0 (55.4–68.1) 62.8 (54.2–70.6) 65.6 (62.5–68.6) 66.3 (63.4–69.1) 60.3 (44.5–74.3)
Negative predictive value 34.7 (22.5–49.4) 36.7 (26.78–48.0) 71.8 (34.1–92.6) 100 36.0 (30.3–42.1)

Data are presented as percentages with 95% confidence intervals.

CXR = single view, portable anteroposterior chest x-ray study; LUS = eight-zone point-of-care lung ultrasound; RT-PCR = nasopharyngeal reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction swab.