Table 2.
Four-factor ANOVA for all species collected by gear types with location (SS, AQ, FC, GP), habitat type (oyster (O) vs. bare (B)), and season (SP, SU, AU) as fixed effects and site nested within the habitat type/location interaction term.
| Interaction Terms | Overall Differences for Terms | Pairwise Differences | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gear | Metric | Location × Habitat Type × Season | Location × Habitat Type | Location × Season | Habitat Type × Season | Location | Habitat Type | Season | Location | Habitat Type | Season |
| Box Trap** | Density | - | - | - | F=13.041 p=0.010 |
- | - | - | None found | Could not be evaluated | None found |
| Biomass | - | F=6.220 p=0.029 |
F=9.411 p=0.015 |
- | - | - | - | None found | AQ:O>B SS:O>B |
AQ:SU>SP | |
| Richness | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Diversity (H) | - | F=10.687 p=0.013 |
- | - | - | - | F=12.879 p=0.011 |
None found | SS:O>B | None found | |
| Seine Net | Density | - | - | - | - | F=8.739 p=0.009 |
F=12.944 p=0.009 |
F=14.661 p<0.05 |
SS<all others | O>B | SP,AU>SU |
| Biomass | - | - | - | - | F=8.798 p=0.009 |
- | F=3.859 p=0.046 |
SS<all others | - | SP,AU>SU | |
| Richness | - | - | - | - | F=6.698 p=0.018 |
- | F=18.795 p<0.001 |
SS<all others | - | SP,AU>SU | |
| Diversity (H) | - | - | - | - | F=16.116 p=0.002 |
- | F=5.765 p=0.015 |
SS<all others | - | SP,SU>AU | |
| Minnow Trap | Abundance | - | - | - | - | - | - | F=6.688 p=0.009 |
- | - | AU>SP,SU |
| Biomass | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Richness | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Diversity (H) | - | - | F=5.220 p=0.006 |
- | - | - | - | AU:AQ>SS; SP:GP>AQ; SU:AQ>FC,SS* |
- | AQ:AU,SU>SP; FC:AU>SU* |
|
| Shrimp Trap | Abundance | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Biomass | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Richness | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Diversity (H) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
All data were normal-score transformed prior to analyses.
Statistical significance reported at p<0.05.
FC-spring could not be evaluated for MT Diversity.
Not all habitat type/location/seasons were sampled so pairwise comparisons could not be fully assessed when significant interactions occurred.
FC and GP sites could not be included in site comparisons due to insufficient sample size.
Nonsignificant relationships and overall comparisons that are not applicable due to significant interactions denoted by −.