Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 18;6(4):2559–2569. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04422

Table 2. Analysis of Artificially Added Imidocarb Milk and Beef Samples by ic-ELISA, LC–MS/MS, and the Immunochromatographic Assay (n = 4)a,b,c.

    IC-Elisa
LC–MS/MS
 
samples spiked detection level (ng/mL) mean ± SD recovery rate (%) CV (%) detection level (ng/mL) mean ± SD recovery rate (%) CV (%) ICA strip
milk samples 0 ND NC NC ND NC NC
  2 1.72 ± 0.04 86.0 ± 2.0% 6.94 1.86 ± 0.03 93.0 ± 1.5% 4.56 ±
  5 4.63 ± 0.09 92.6 ± 1.8% 4.28 4.75 ± 0.07 95 ± 1.4% 3.07 ±
  20 18.70 ± 0.29 93.5 ± 1.5% 2.37 19.12 ± 0.25 95.6 ± 1.3% 1.97 +
beef samples 0 ND NC NC ND NC NC
  5 4.23 ± 0.16 84.5 ± 3.2% 7.13 4.43 ± 0.15 88.5 ± 3.0% 5.37 ±
  10 9.16 ± 0.17 91.6 ± 1.7% 5.17 9.34 ± 0.14 93.4 ± 1.4% 3.25 ±
  50 50.61 ± 0.63 101.2 ± 1.3% 3.02 50.45 ± 0.59 100.9 ± 1.2% 2.07 +
a

ND, not detectable.

b

NC, not calculated.

c

–, negative: the concentration of imidocarb was below 5 μg/kg; ±, weakly positive: the concentration of imidocarb was in the range of 5–20 μg/kg; +, positive: the concentration of imidocarb exceed 20 μg/kg.