Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;8(3):8852. doi: 10.4081/hpr.2020.8852

Table 1.

Pearson’s correlations between demographic and social factors with psychological symptoms.

f or
M
SD or
%
IES-r HAS
r
HDS
Gender Female 14 48 0.26 0.16 -0.28
Years of education1 ≥12yrs 18 62 -0.12 -0.25 -0.26
Companion [spouse or partner] With 18 62 0.23 0.28 0.34
Children With 19 66 0.19 0.27 0.30
Income2 Medium 14 48 -0.42* -0.27 -0.41*
Another important event3 Yes 5 19 0.62** 0.30 0.09
Mental health care services4 before ICU Yes 3 10 0.17 0.20 0.19
Mental health care services after ICU Yes 8 28 0.01 -0.12 -0.06
Negative occupational change5 With 10 34 0.43* 0.43* 0.53**
Age 46.66 15.15 -0.03 0.01 0.28
Months of sick leave6 5.31 5.35 0.53* 0.36 0.45
Social Constraint 2.12 0.92 0.53** 0.27 0.40*
Desire to talk about ICU (DT)7 3.79 1.66 0.28 0.47* 0.16
Frequency of ICU talks (FT) 3.95 1.28 0.28 0.38* 0.27

N=29 unless otherwise noted; *p<0.05, **p<0.01; IES-r= impact of event scale-revised, HAS= anxiety subscale of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), HDS= depression subscale of HADS, ICU= intensive care unit; 1Eleven participants had nine years of education or less, 2Fifteen participants reported low income; 3N=26, three men reported as additional stressors health problems (past or continuous) and two women family events, 4The term “services” is referred either to psychiatric prescription or to psychological sessions; 5With refers to participants who had been working before ICU admission and a year after the ICU stay either they were unemployed or retired (one case); 6This factor refers only to participants who had been working prior to ICU admission (n=18, 17 valid cases because a participant didn’t report the time of sick leave); 7Spearman Statistic was used.